Advertisement

rdfedit: User Supporting Web Application for Creating and Manipulating RDF Instance Data

  • Oliver Pohl
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 478)

Abstract

rdfedit is a web application running on Django, rdflib and jQuery DataTables that supports novices in the field of Semantic Web technologies with the creation of RDF instance metadata. By utilizing the Semantic Web search engine Sindice, rdfedit can transform literals into URIs, fetch triples from external resources and import them into the user’s local graph. Metadata experts can easily configure these features of rdfedit to fit their preferences regarding metadata schemata, so metadata creators with few knowledge about Semantic Web technologies can create RDF data in a fast and consistent manner while also following the Linked Data principles.

Keywords

RDF Editor Metadata Sindice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamins, D.V.R., Radoff, M., Davis, M., Greaves, M., Lockwood, R., Contreras, D.J.: Semantic Technology Adoption: A Business Perspective. In: Domingue, J., Fensel, D., Hendler, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, pp. 619–657. Springer, Heidelberg (2011), http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-540-92913-0_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - Design Issues (2006), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
  3. 3.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. The Scientific American (May 2001), http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-semantic-web/
  4. 4.
    Bizer, C., Eckert, K., Meusel, R., Mühleisen, H., Schuhmacher, M., Völker, J.: Deployment of RDFa, Microdata, and Microformats on the Web – A Quantitative Analysis. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8219, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2013), http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(3), 1–22 (2009), http://www.igi-global.com/article/linked-data-story-far/37496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corlosquet, S., Delbru, R., Clark, T., Polleres, A., Decker, S.: Produce and Consume Linked Data with Drupal! In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 763–778. Springer, Heidelberg (2009), http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, I., Steiner, T., Le Hors, A.J.: RDF 1.1 JSON Alternate Serialization (RDF/JSON): W3C Working Group Note 07. Tech. rep., W3 (November 2013), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-json/
  8. 8.
    Franzon, E.: End of Support for the Sindice.com search engine: history, lessons learned, and legacy (May 2014), http://semanticweb.com/end-support-sindice-com-search-engine-history-lessons-learned-legacy-guest-post_b42797
  9. 9.
    Gandon, F., Schreiber, G.: RDF 1.1 XML Syntax: W3C Recommendation 25 February 2014. Tech. rep., W3 (2014), http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20140225/
  10. 10.
    Havlik, D.: Building Environmental Semantic Web Applications with Drupal. In: Hřebíček, J., Schimak, G., Denzer, R. (eds.) ISESS 2011. IFIP AICT, vol. 359, pp. 385–397. Springer, Heidelberg (2011), http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-22285-6_42
  11. 11.
    Hendler, J.: Agents and the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 30–37 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jentzsch, A., Cyganiak, R., Bizer, C.: State of the LOD Cloud. Tech. rep. (2011), http://lod-cloud.net/state/
  13. 13.
    Mika, P., Potter, T.: Metadata Statistics for a Large Web Corpus. LDOW 937 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Newman, A.: A Relational View of the Semantic Web (March 2007), http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2007/03/14/a-relational-view-of-the-semantic-web.html
  15. 15.
    Nielsen, J.: Interactive Technologies: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Saint Louis (1994), http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10712933 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nixon, L., Volz, D.R., Ciravegna, F., Studer, R.: Future Trends. In: Domingue, J., Fensel, D., Hendler, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, pp. 581–618. Springer, Heidelberg (2011), http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-540-92913-0_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rogers, E.M.: Innovativeness and Adopter Categories. In: Diffusion of Innovations, pp. 267–299. Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Schmachtenberg, M., Bizer, C., Paulheim, H.: Adoption of the Linked Data Best Practices in Different Topical Domains. In: Janowicz, K. (ed.) ISWC 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8796, pp. 245–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2014), http://dws.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/fileadmin/lehrstuehle/ki/pub/SchmachtenbergBizerPaulheim-AdoptionOfLinkedDataBestPractices.pdf
  20. 20.
    Singhal, A.: Introducing the Knowledge Graph: things, not strings (February 2012), http://googleblog.blogspot.de/2012/05/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.html
  21. 21.
    Sletten, B.: Keep on Keeping on (January 2014), http://semanticweb.com/keep-on-keepin-on_b41339
  22. 22.
    Stuart, D.: Facilitating access to the web of data: a guide for librarians, 1st publ. edn. Facet Publ., London (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Pohl
    • 1
  1. 1.Berlin School of Library and Information ScienceHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations