Advertisement

Evaluating (Linked) Metadata Transformations Across Cultural Heritage Domains

  • Kim Tallerås
  • David Massey
  • Anne-Stine Ruud Husevåg
  • Michael Preminger
  • Nils Pharo
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 478)

Abstract

This paper describes an approach to the evaluation of different aspects in the transformation of existing metadata into Linked data-compliant knowledge bases. At Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science, in the TORCH project, we are working on three different experimental case studies on extraction and mapping of broadcasting data and the interlinking of these with transformed library data. The case studies are investigating problems of heterogeneity and ambiguity in and between the domains, as well as problems arising in the interlinking process. The proposed approach makes it possible to collaborate on evaluation across different experiments, and to rationalize and streamline the process.

Keywords

Manual Annotation Annotation Tool Ground Truth Data Library Community Broadcasting Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data: design issues. Technical report, W3C (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heath, T., Bizer, C.: Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a global data space. Morgan & Claypool (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tallerå, S.K.: From many records to one graph: Heterogeneity conflicts in the Linked data restructuring cycle. Information Research 18(3) (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Svenonius, E.: The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reigem, O.: Sift - searching in free text: A text retrieval system (abstract only). SIGSOC Bull. 12-13(4-1), 59 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raimond, Y.: Schema.org for TV and Radio markup (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knoblock, C.A., Szekely, P., Ambite, J.L., Goel, A., Gupta, S., Lerman, K., Muslea, M., Taheriyan, M., Mallick, P.: Semi-automatically mapping structured sources into the semantic web. In: Simperl, E., Cimiano, P., Polleres, A., Corcho, O., Presutti, V. (eds.) ESWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7295, pp. 375–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hinze, A., Heese, R., Luczak-Rösch, M., Paschke, A.: Semantic Enrichment by Non-experts: Usability of Manual Annotation Tools. In: Cudré-Mauroux, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7649, pp. 165–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jonsdottir, A.: ARNER, what kind of name is that?: an automatic rule-based named entity recognizer for Norwegian. PhD thesis, University of Oslo (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grishman, R., Sundheim, B.: Design of the MUC-6 evaluation. In: Proceedings of a Workshop on Held at Vienna, Virginia, May 6-8, pp. 413–422. Association for Computational Linguistics (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maynard, D., Peters, W., Li, Y.: Metrics for Evaluation of Ontology-based Information Extraction. In: WWW Conference 2006, Workshop on “Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web”, Edinburgh, Scotland (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferrara, A., Lorusso, D., Montanelli, S., Varese, G.: Towards a benchmark for instance matching. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Matching, OM 2008 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Tallerås
    • 1
  • David Massey
    • 1
  • Anne-Stine Ruud Husevåg
    • 1
  • Michael Preminger
    • 1
  • Nils Pharo
    • 1
  1. 1.Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied ScienceNorway

Personalised recommendations