Skip to main content

A Logic for Context-Aware Non-monotonic Reasoning Agents

  • Conference paper
Human-Inspired Computing and Its Applications (MICAI 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8856))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We develop a logical model for resource-bounded context-aware multi-agent systems which handles inconsistent context information using non-monotonic reasoning. We extend the temporal logic CTL * with belief and communication modalities, and the resulting logic \(\mathcal{L}_{DROCS}\) allows us to describe a set of rule-based non-monotonic context-aware agents with bounds on computational (time and space) and communication resources. We use OWL 2 RL ontologies and Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) for context-modelling and rules that enables the construction of a formal system. We provide an axiomatization of the logic and prove it is sound and complete. We illustrate the use of the logical model on a simple example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alechina, N., Logan, B., Nga, N.H., Rakib, A.: Verifying time and communication costs of rule-based reasoners. In: Peled, D.A., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) MoChArt 2008. LNCS, vol. 5348, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Antoniou, G., Billington, D., Governatori, G., Maher, M.J.: Representation results for defeasible logic. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2(2), 255–287 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D. (eds.): P.F.P.S.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baldauf, M., Dustdar, S., Rosenberg, F.: A survey on context-aware systems. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing 2(4), 263–277 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bikakis, A., Antoniou, G., Hasapis, P.: Strategies for contextual reasoning with conflicts in ambient intelligence. Knowledge and Information Systems 27(1), 45–84 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Byun, H.E., Chevers, K.: Utilizing context history to provide dynamic adaptations. Applied Artificial Intelligence 18(6), 533–548 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniele, L., Costa, P.D., Pires, L.F.: Towards a rule-based approach for context-aware applications. In: Pras, A., van Sinderen, M. (eds.) EUNICE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4606, pp. 33–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dey, A., Abwowd, G.: Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. Technical Report GIT-GVU-99-22, Georgia Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R.: Well-founded semantics for description logic programs in the semantic web. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 12(2), 1–11 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ejigu, D., Scuturici, M., Brunie, L.: An ontology-based approach to context modeling and reasoning in pervasive computing. In: PerCom Workshops 2007, pp. 14–19 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eker, S., Meseguer, J., Sridharanarayanan, A.: The maude LTL model checker and its implementation. In: Ball, T., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) SPIN 2003. LNCS, vol. 2648, pp. 230–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Esposito, A., Tarricone, L., Zappatore, M., Catarinucci, L., Colella, R., DiBari, A.: A framework for context-aware home-health monitoring. In: Sandnes, F.E., Zhang, Y., Rong, C., Yang, L.T., Ma, J. (eds.) UIC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5061, pp. 119–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gómez, S.A., Chesñevar, C.I., Simari, G.R.: Inconsistent ontology handling by translating description logics into defeasible logic programming. Inteligencia Artificial, Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial 11(35), 11–22 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: Combining logic programs with description logic. In: WWW 2003, pp. 48–57. ACM Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: A java API for working with OWL 2 Ontologies. In: 6th OWL Experienced and Directions Workshop (OWLED) (October 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levy, A.Y., Rousset, M.C.: Combining horn rules and description logics in CARIN. Artif. Intell. 104(1-2), 165–209 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Motik, B., Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Wu, Z., Fokoue, A., Lutz, C.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Profiles, W3C Recommendation. (October 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/

  18. Motik, B., Sattler, U., Studer, R.: Query answering for OWL-DL with rules. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3, 41–60 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pollock, J.L.: Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science 11(4), 481–518 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Protégé: The Protégé ontology editor and knowledge-base framework (Version 4.1) (July 2011), http://protege.stanford.edu/

  21. Rakib, A., Haque, H.M.U., Faruqui, R.U.: A temporal description logic for resource-bounded rule-based context-aware agents. In: Vinh, P.C., Alagar, V., Vassev, E., Khare, A. (eds.) ICCASA 2013. LNICST, vol. 128, pp. 3–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Reynolds, M.: An axiomatization of full computation tree logic. J. Symb. Log. 66(3), 1011–1057 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosati, R.: DL+log: Tight integration of description logics and disjunctive datalog. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 68–78. AAAI Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schilit, B., Adams, N., Want, R.: Context-aware computing applications. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 85–90. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt, A., Beigl, M., Gellersen, H.W.: There is more to context than location. Computers and Graphics 23, 893–901 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Viterbo, F.J., da G. Malcher, M., Endler, M.: Supporting the development of context-aware agent-based systems for mobile networks. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1872–1873. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rakib, A., Haque, H.M.U. (2014). A Logic for Context-Aware Non-monotonic Reasoning Agents. In: Gelbukh, A., Espinoza, F.C., Galicia-Haro, S.N. (eds) Human-Inspired Computing and Its Applications. MICAI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8856. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13647-9_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13647-9_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13646-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13647-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics