Skip to main content

Cultural Heritage as Civilizing Mission: Methodological Considerations

  • Chapter
Cultural Heritage as Civilizing Mission

Abstract

The self-legitimation of political regimes in modern history was and often still is attempted through a twofold strategy: (a) a normative assessment of the ruled country’s past and present, and (b) the enactment of a concrete committed action programme to guide the nation towards a better future. The interest in this dynamic of a normative (intro-)vision on the one hand, and—as a practical consequence—of an applied, action-oriented mission on the other, forms the basis of this volume’s thematic inquiry. Although this critical assessment of the past and present may encompass a wide variety of aspects (social, financial, moral, intellectual, etc.), our focus here is on the specific field of materialized culture, and in particular on the complex of architectural manifestations that crystallizes over time through a multiform process into a (supposedly) “representative,” (i.e. trans-generational and collective) cultural canon of the nation known as cultural heritage.

The era of decadence […] ended with the arrival of the French in Indochina. Civilization does not exist anymore in this privileged country where it once strongly flourished, but the soil preserved its incomparable fertility. Since we put our flag into this region, it seems that [this civilization] begins to live and breathe again. […] is it not up to us to revive the marvelous past of this people, to reconstitute the admirable oeuvres which their genius has created; in a word: to enrich the history of art and the annals of humanity with a new page?

All English translations in this introduction are mine.

Louis Delaporte in this 1880 publication Voyage au Cambodge

Angkor must be saved! This challenge, in which UNESCO proposes to stand beside the people of Cambodia, extends far beyond a mere restoration of relics of the past. For the saving of Angkor will allow an entire people to regain its pride, its will to live and a renewed vigor with which to rebuilt its country. I therefore appeal to the international community as a whole to put the stamp of universal solidarity on the rebirth of Angkor.

UNESCO’s director general, Federico Mayor’s Appeal for the protection, preservation, restoration and presentation of the site of Angkor, launched on November 30, 1991 in front of the Angkor Wat temple

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Original French: La protection et la sauvegarde des monuments, ou plus généralement des oeuvres d’art, intéressant les souvenir et l’histoire de toutes les nations civilisées s’imposent à la pensée de quiconque connaît, aime, respecte les traditions ou les gloires de sa patrie. […] Pénetrés d’une même pensée, nous voulos provoquer un courant sympathique, une ligue internationale, qui puisse constituer, même au milieu des violences de la guerre, une défense efficace du patrimoine légué par le passé à toutes les générations présentes. [italics MF]

References

  • Adas, Michael. 2004. “Contested Hegemony: The Great War and the Afro-Asian Assault in the Civilizing Mission Ideology.” In: Decolonization. Perspectives from Now and Then, edited by Prasenjit Duara, 78–100. Routledge: London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Azm, Sadik Jalal. 1981. “Orientalism and Orientalism in reverse.” Khamsin. Revue des Socialistes révolutionnaires du Proche-Orient 8, 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1998. The Spectre of Comparisons. Nationalism, Southeast Asia and the World. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bade, Klaus J. 1982. Imperialismus und Kolonialmission. Kaiserliches Deutschland und koloniales Imperium. Wiesbaden: Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancel, Nicolas, Pascal Blanchard, and Françoise Vergès. 2003. La République coloniale. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, Boris, and Jürgen Osterhammel, eds. 2005. Zivilisierungsmissionen. Imperiale Weltverbesserung seit dem 18. Jahrhundert. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basalla, George. 1967. “The Spread of Western Science.” Science 156: 3775: 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayly, C.A. 1998. “The First Age of Global Imperialism, c.1760–1830.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 26: 28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Raymond. 1961. Assimilation and Association in French Colonial Theory 1890–1914. New York, London: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1982. “The French Colonial Empire and the French World-View.” In Racism and Colonialism, edited by Robert Ross, 65–77. Leiden: Leiden University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloembergen, Marieke, and Remco Raben, eds. 2009. The Colonial Civilizing Mission. Trajectories to the New Indies, 1890–1950. Leiden: KITLV Uitgeverij. Orginal in Dutch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloembergen, Marieke and Martijn Eickhoff. 2013. “A Wind of Change on Java’s Ruined Temples. Archaeological Activities, Imperial Circuits and Heritage Awareness in Java and the Netherlands (1800–1850)” BMGN—Low Countries Historical Review 28: 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouretz, Pierre. 2000. La République et l’universel. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celik, Zeynep. 1992. Displaying the Orient: Architecture at Nineteenth-Century World’s Fairs. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafer, Tony, and Amanda Sackur, eds. 2002. Promoting the Colonial Idea. Propaganda and Visions of Empire in France. London: Palgrave

    Google Scholar 

  • Choay, Françoise. 1992. L’allégorie du patrimoine. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2009. Le patrimoine en questions. Anthologie pour un combat. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, James. 1988. The Predicament of Culture. Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge (Mass.), London: Harvard University Press, 255–76. (“On Orientalism”)

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1989. “The others. Beyond the ‘salvage paradigm’.” Third Text (special issue Magiciens de la Terre) 3,6: 73–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codell, Julie, and Dianne Sachko Macleod, eds. 1998. Orientalism Transposed. The Impact of the Colonies on British culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Bernard S. 1996. Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge. The British in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, Alice. 1997. A Mission to Civilize: the Republican Idea of Empire in France and West-Africa, 1895–1930. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Sebastian, and Shalini Randeira, eds. 2002. Postkoloniale Perspektiven in den Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, Dino. 2008. Mission civilisatrice. Le rôle de l’histoire coloniale dans la construction de l’identité politique française. Paris: Éditions la découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daughton, James Patrick. 2002. The Civilizing Mission: Missions, Colonialists, and the French Identity, 1885–1914. Ann Arbor: University Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschamps, Hubert. 1963. “Et Maintenant, Lord Lugard?” Africa, Journal of the International African Institute 33,4: 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desroches-Noblecourt, Christiane and Georg Gerster. 1968. The World saves Abu Simbel. Vienna: Koska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edsel, Robert M., and Bret Witter. 2009. The Monuments Men. Allied Heroes, Nazi Thieves and the Greatest Treasure Hunt in History. London: Center Street.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Norbert. 1976. Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. 2 vols. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Graham et al., eds. 2008. The Heritage Reader. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falser, Michael. 2010. “From the Venice Charter (1964) to the Nara Conference (1994)––changing concepts of authenticity?” In Theory and Practice in Conservation and Preservation––Interactions between Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the International Conference of the ICOMOS International Scientific Committee for the Theory and Philosophy of Conservation and Restoration, April 23–27 (Vienna), edited by Michael Falser, Wilfried Lipp and Andrzej Tomaszewski, 115–32. Florence: Polistampa. Online in a German version of 2011. Accessed October 14, 2014. http://www.kunstgeschichte-ejournal.net/239/

  • ——. 2011. “Krishna and the Plaster Cast. Translating the Cambodian Temple of Angkor Wat in the French Colonial Period.” Transcultural Studies 2: 6–50. Accessed September 15, 2012. http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/ojs/index.php/transcultural/article/view/9083.

  • ——. 2015. Angkor Wat. From Jungle Find to Global Icon. A Transcultural History of Heritage. Berlin: De Gruyter. [forthcoming]

    Google Scholar 

  • Falser, Michael and Monica Juneja, eds. 2013a. Kulturerbe und Denkmalpflege transkulturell. Grenzgänge zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2013b. “Archaeologising” Heritage? Transcultural Entanglements between Local Social Practices and Global Virtual Realities. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, Walter. 2000. The Safekeepers. A Memoir of the Arts at the End of World War II. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, Jörg. 1992. “Zivilisation, Kultur.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, edited by Otto Brunner, vol. 7, 679–774. Stuttgart: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. 1978. “Eine strukturelle Theorie des Imperialismus.” In Imperialismus und strukturelle Gewalt. Analysen über abhängige Reproduktion, edited by Dieter Senghaas, 29–104. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. First edition 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardet, Raoul. 1972. L’Idee coloniale en France 1871–1962. Paris: Editions de la Table Ronde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, Ian C. 2006. “Some National, Regional, and Political Uses of Archaeology in East and Southeast Asia.” In The Archaeology of Asia, edited by Miriam Stark, 17–36. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gouda, Frances. 1995. Dutch Culture Overseas: Colonial Practice in the Netherlands Indies, 1900–1942. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harmand, Jules. 1910. Domination and Colonisation. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger, eds. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Barbara T., ed. 2006. Art and Culture Heritage. Law, Policy, and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS. 1964. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter). Accessed March 6, 2014. http://www.international.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf.

  • Jennings, Eric T. 2005. “Visions and Representations of French Empire.” The Journal of Modern History 77, 3: 701–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokilehto, Jukka. 1999. A History of Architectural Conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2013. “After Nara. The Process of Transculturation in Global Heritage Doctrines.” In Kulturerbe und Denkmalpflege transkulturell. Grenzgänge zwischen Theorie und Praxis, edited by Michael Falser and Monica Juneja, 321–40. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jomard, Edme François, ed. 1809–1828. Description de l’Égypte ou recueil des observations et des recherches qui ont été faites en Égypte pendant l’expédition de l’armée française, publié par les ordres de Sa Majesté l’Empereur Napoléon le Grand. 18 vols. Paris: L’Imprimérie Impériale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juneja, Monica. 2001. “Introduction.” In Architecture in Medieval India: Forms, Contexts, Histories, edited by Monica Juneja, 1–108. New Delhi: Permanent Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2012a. “Kunstgeschichte und kulturelle Differenz. Eine Einleitung.” Kritische Berichte 40,2 (themed issue Universalität der Kunstgeschichte?), edited by Matthias Bruhn, Monica Juneja, and Elke Anne Werner, 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2012b. “Global Art History and the ‘Burden of Representation’.” In Global Studies: Mapping contemporary Art and Culture, edited by Hans Belting, Jakob Birken, and Andrea Buddensieg, 274–297. Stuttgart: Hatje Cantz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juneja, Monica, and Margit Pernau. 2009. “Lost in translation? Transcending Boundaries in Comparative History.” In Comparative and Transnational History. Central European Approaches and New Perspectives, edited by Heinz-Gerhard Haupt and Jürgen Kocka, 105–29. New York, Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhard. 2004. Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press. Originally published in German as Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Labouret, Henri. 1962. Colonisation, colonialisme, décolonisation. Paris: Larose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laissus, Yves. 1998. L’Egypte, une aventure savante: Avec Bonaparte, Kleber, Menou 1798–1801. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Knut Einar, and Nils Marstein, eds. Conference on Authenticity in relation to the World Heritage Convention. Preparatory Workshop, Bergen/Norway, January 31–February 2, 1994. Trondheim: Riksantikvaren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Knut Einar, ed. 1995. Nara Conference on Authenticity in relation to the World Heritage Convention. Nara/Japan November 1–6, 1994. Trondheim: Tapir Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurens, Henry et al. 1989. L’Expédition d’Égypte. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leniaud, Jean-Michel. 2002. Les archipels du passé. Le patrimoine et son histoire. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locher-Scholten, Elsbeth. 1981. Ethics in Fragments. Five Studies about Colonial Thinking and Practices of Dutchmen in the Indonesian Archipelago 1877–1942. Utrecht: HES Publishers. Original in Dutch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorin, Amaury. 2008. “La ‘découverte’ française du site: autour de Paul Doumer et de la fondation de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient.” In Angkor VIIIe-XXIe siècle: mémoire et identité khmères, edited by Hugues Tertrais, 110–23. Paris: Édition Autrement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, David. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1996. Possessed by the Past: The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfie, Alexander Lyon, ed. 2000. Orientalism. A Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 2004. “‘Torchbearers upon the Path of Progress’: Britain’s Ideology of a ‘Moral and Material Progress’ in India. An Introductory Essay.” In Colonialism as Civilising Mission. Cultural Ideology in British India, edited by Harald Fischer-Tiné and Michael Mann, 1–26. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministère du commerce, de l’industrie et des colonies, Exposition universelle international de 1889, Direction générale de l’exploitation. 1889a. Congrès international pour la protection des oeuvres d’art et des monuments, tenu à Paris du 24 au 29 juin 1889: procès verbaux sommaires, rédigés par le secretraire général Charles Normand. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1889b. Congrès international colonial, tenu à Paris du 30 juillet au 3 août 1889: procès verbaux sommaires. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Timothy. 1989. “The World as Exhibition.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31: 217–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Patricia L. 2000. Hybrid Modernities. Architecture and Presentation at the 1931 Colonial Exposition, Paris. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafziger, James A., and Tullio Scovazzi, eds. 2008. Le patrimoine de l’humanité. The Cultural Heritage of Mankind. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office international des musées. 1939. La protection des monuments et des oeuvres d’art en temps de guerre. Manuel technique et juridique. Paris: Publications de l’Institut Internationale de Coopération Intellectuelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterhammel, Jürgen. 2005. “‘The Great Work of Uplifting Manking.’ Zivilisierungsmission und Moderne.” In Zivilisierungsmissionen. Imperiale Weltverbesserung seit dem 18. Jahrhundert, edited by Boris Barth and Jürgen Osterhammel, 363–427. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2006. Europe, the ‘West’ and the Civilizing Mission. London: German Historical Institute London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2012. Kolonialismus: Geschichte, Formen, Folgen. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2005. “Empire & ‘Civilizing’ Missions, Past & Present.” Daedalus (theme issue On Imperialism) 134,2: 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulot, Dominique. 1997. Musée, nation, patrimoine 1789–1815. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pottier, Christophe. 2000. “The Contribution of the École Française d’Extrême-Orient with Respect to the Cultural Heritage of Angkor During the Past 100 Years.” Journal of Sophia Asian Studies 18: 253–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, Mary Louise. 1992. Imperial Eyes. Travel Writing and Transculturation. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyenson, Lewis. 1993. Civilising Mission. Exact Sciences and French Overseas Expansion, 1830–1940. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the American Commission for the Protection and Salvage of Artistic and Historic Monuments in War Areas. Washington DC, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorimer, James. 1950. Survival. The Salvage and Protection of Art in War. New York: Abelard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin. First published in 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäbler, Birgit. 2003. “Globale Moderne und die Geburt der Zivilisationsmission an der französischen Binnengrenze: Die mission civilisatrice ottomane.” Periplus (themed issue Westasien und die Moderne): 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, Wolfgang M. 2005. “Mission impossible? Begriff, Modelle und Begründungen der ‘civilising mission’ aus philosophischer Sicht.” In Zivilisierungsmissionen. Imperiale Weltverbesserung seit dem 18. Jahrhundert, edited by Boris Barth and Jürgen Osterhammel, 13–32. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, Indra. 2013. “A Conservation Code for the Colony: John Marshall’s Conservation Manual and Monument Preservation Between India and Europe.” In Archaeologising’“Archaeologising” Heritage? Transcultural Entanglements between Local Social Practices and Global Virtual Realities, edited by Michael Falser and Monica Juneja, 21–37. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singaravélou, Pierre. 1999. L’École française d’Extrême-Orient, ou l’institution des marges, 1898–1956: essai d’histoire sociale et politique de la science coloniale. Paris: Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skilton, John Jr. 1948. Défense de l’art européen. Souvenirs d’un officier américain “Specialite des Monuments.” Paris: Les èditions internationales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. “Does the Subaltern speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, John H., and Emily G. Makas. 2011. Architectural Conservation in Europe and the Americas. National Experiences and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, Astrid, and Peter Mandler eds. 2013. From Plunder to Preservation: Britain and the Heritage of Empire, c. 1800–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Bryan S. 1994. Orientalism, Postmodernism and Globalism. London: Routledge, 100–4. (“From Orientalism to Global Sociology”).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 1972. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Accessed March 6, 2014. http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/.

  • ——. 1977–2013. The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Accessed March 6, 2014. http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/.

  • Waterton, Emma, and Steve Watson, eds. 2010. Culture, Heritage and Representation. Perspectives on Visuality and the Past. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, Carey A. 2011. “Introduction: The Relevance and Complexity of Civilizing Missions c. 1800–2010.” In Civilising Mission in Colonial and Postcolonial South Asia. From Improvement to Development, edited by Carey A. Watt and Michael Mann, 1–34. London, New York, New Delhi: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, Michael, and Bénédicte Zimmermann. 2004. De la comparaison à l’histoire croisée. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Owen, and James P. Daughton, eds. 2012. French Missionaries and the Modern World. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Falser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Falser, M. (2015). Cultural Heritage as Civilizing Mission: Methodological Considerations. In: Falser, M. (eds) Cultural Heritage as Civilizing Mission. Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13638-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics