• Shimon FriedmanEmail author


This new textbook on current and potential applications of nanotechnology in endodontics is offered to the endodontic community at a juncture when there is emerging understanding that traditional endodontic therapy may be limited in its ability to cure apical periodontitis and retain treated teeth. Improvements in treatment outcomes have been elusive, suggesting that “out of the box” approaches are needed beyond conventional endodontic therapy and restorative concepts.

Dr. Kishen’s textbook offers the first focused glimpse at nanomaterials harnessed for root canal disinfection and stabilization of root dentin to overcome the microbial resilience, the ultimate challenge in endodontic therapy, and to enhance the resistance of root dentin to cracking. It provides an insight into how emerging nanotechnologies may benefit teeth and patients. Because of its focus on emerging innovative technologies, the content of this textbook and its detailed analysis are not yet found in any of the other endodontic textbooks. In this regard, it is a most timely addition to the endodontic texts which will become a valuable resource for endodontic clinicians and researchers.


Endodontic disease Nanomaterials Remineralization 


  1. 1.
    Strindberg LZ. The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors. An analytic study based on radiographic and clinical follow-up examination. Acta Odontol Scand. 1956;14:21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seltzer S, Bender IB, Turkenkopf S. Factors affecting successful repair after root canal therapy. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963;52:651–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grossman LI, Shepard LI, Pearson LA. Roentgenologic and clinical evaluation of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1964;17:368–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engström B, Lundberg M. The correlation between positive culture and the prognosis of root canal therapy after pulpectomy. Odontol Revy. 1965;16:193–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harty FJ, Parkins BJ, Wengraf AM. Success rate in root canal therapy. A retrospective study of conventional cases. Br Dent J. 1970;128:65–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, Marquis V, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study – phase 4: initial treatment. J Endod. 2008;34:258–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ng Y-L, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J. 2011;44:583–609.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, Burleson JA, Spangberg LS. A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:825–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ng Y-L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J. 2007;40:921–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ng Y-L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008;41:6–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EndodonticsUniversity of Toronto Faculty of DentistryTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations