Skip to main content

Commanded Aspirations and Half-Hearted Enactment: The (Yet) Unfulfilled Promises of French-Style CSR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 2780 Accesses

Abstract

Although France came rather late to the corporate social responsibility (CSR) gathering, strong political will to address the CSR notion emerged around the turn of the twenty-first century, materializing in a substantial and pioneering body of legislation. However, the political aspirations and associated legislative efforts have not always led to the expected changes in how French companies address CSR-related issues in practice. The seeds of CSR progress and evolution may have been planted by key political and business actors in the past two decades, but French-style CSR remains, to a certain extent, an unfulfilled promise. This chapter briefly evokes the central characteristics of CSR in France’s business and political environments. Following an account of the historical evolution of France’s CSR-related regulatory efforts and government-led initiatives, with a strong focus on the twenty-first century, this chapter details the central challenges for the continued development and progress of CSR in the French business landscape.

We are all full of discourses that we only half understand and half mean.

—Rae Armantrout, poet

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The possibility of sanctions is not excluded though; administrative and monetary penalties can be imposed by financial market authorities, and the provision of false, misleading, or incomplete information is punishable under criminal law and may be subject to civil penalties.

References

  • Albareda, L., Lozano, J., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baratin, F., Helias, A., Le Quentrec, M., Moreau, R., & Vilchien, D. (2007). Mise en œuvre par les entreprises françaises cotées de l’obligation de publier des informations sociales et environnementales. Paris: Inspection générale de l’environnement, Conseil général des mines and Inspection générale des affaires sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaujolin, F., & Capron, M. (2005). France – Balancing between constructive harassment and virtuous intentions. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 97–108). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berthoin Antal, A., & Sobczak, A. (2004). Beyond CSR: Organizational learning for global responsibility. Journal of General Management, 30(2), 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthoin Antal, A., & Sobczak, A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in France: A mix of national traditions and international influences. Business and Society, 46(1), 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasco, M., & Zolner, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Mexico and France: Exploring the role of normative institutions. Business and Society, 49(2), 216–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocquet, R., & Mothe, C. (2011). Exploring the relationship between CSR and innovation: A comparison between small and large sized French companies. Revue Sciences de Gestion, 80, 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brovelli, L., Drago, X., Molinié, E., Fribourg, M., Lenoir, C., Le Divenah, J.-P., et al. (2013). Responsabilité et performance des organisations. Paris: Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances; Ministère du Commerce Extérieur; Ministère de l’Ecologie, du Développement Durable et de l’Energie; Ministère du Travail, de l’Emploi, de la Formation Professionnelle et du Dialogue Social.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cone Communications. (2013). Global CSR study. Boston, MA: Cone Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotentin, C., & Duval, G. (2009). Editorial: Le chemin est encore long. Alternatives Economiques, Special Issue 41, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSR Europe. (2010). A guide to CSR in Europe: Country insights by CSR Europe’s national partner organizations. Brussels: CSR Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Humières, P. (2013). Où en est la RSE en France, à la veille d'initiatives publiques nouvelles? Blog of the Institut RSE. Available at http://www.reporting-rse.com/EasyBlog/ou-en-est-la-rse-en-france-a-la-veille-dinitiatives-publiques-nouvelles.html, last accessed on March 25, 2014.

  • Deloitte France. (2013). Reporting RSE selon l’article 225 de la loi ‘Grenelle 2’ – Bilan de la première année d’application. Neuilly-sur-Seine: Deloitte & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard Harribey, L. (2009). France. In S. O. Idowu & W. Leal Filho (Eds.), Global practices of corporate social responsibility (pp. 37–60). Berlin: Springer. Chapter 2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, E., & Honoré-Rougé, Y. (2012). La responsabilité sociétale des entreprises: Une démarche déjà répandue. INSEE Première, 1421 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young. (2012). How France’s new sustainability reporting law impacts US companies. London: Ernst & Young.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCRSE. (2011). Le FCRSE exige du gouvernement qu’il respecte ses engagements en matière de transparence des entreprises. Paris: Forum Citoyen pour la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises. Press Release (March 4).

    Google Scholar 

  • FCRSE. (2012). Parution du décret d’application de l’article 225: le tour de passe-passe. Paris: Forum Citoyen pour la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises. Press Release (May 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P., & Zajac, E. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 501–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groupe Alpha. (2004). Les informations sociales dans les rapports annuels: Deuxième année d’application de la loi NRE. Marseille: Groupe Alpha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groupe Alpha. (2005). Les informations sociales dans les rapports annuels: Troisième année d’application de la loi NRE. Marseille: Groupe Alpha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groupe Alpha. (2012). Bilan de neuf années d’application de la loi NRE en matière de reporting social. Marseille: Groupe Alpha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter? Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 485–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, L., Rubin, R., & Dhanda, K. (2007). The communication of corporate social responsibility: United States and European Union multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2011). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. HBS Working Paper Series 11-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Zug: KPMG International Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2006). What works in securities laws? Journal of Finance, 61(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, S. (2013). Is there a ‘CSR made in France’? Business for Social Responsibility (BSR) – Our insights. Available at http://www.bsr.org/fr/our-insights/blog-view/is-there-a-csr-made-in-france, last accessed on March 16, 2014.

  • Lydenberg, S., & Grace, K. (2008). Innovations in social and environmental disclosure outside the United States. New York, NY: Domini Social Investments and Social Investment Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangematin, Y. (2013). Management et lois RSE: Vers un droit impératif et une opportunité stratégique. CEREFIGE Working Paper Series 2013-06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2005). A conceptual framework for understanding CSR. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 335–356). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., Slager, R., Anastasiadis, S., Hardi, P., Bartz, R., & Knudsen, J. S. (2012). Analysis of the national and EU policies supporting corporate social responsibility and impact. IMPACT Working Paper Series 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., & Baddache, F. (2012). The five W’s of France’s CSR reporting law. San Francisco, CA: Business for Social Responsibility (BSR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riess, B., & Welzel, C. (2006). Government as partner? CSR policy in Europe. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (2003). French capitalism transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Economy and Society, 32(4), 526–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobczak, A., & Martins Coelho, L. (2010). The impact and interplay of national and global CSR discourses: Insights from France and Brazil. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, R.-A., & Margula, S. (2012). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(4), 206–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SustainAbility, Utopies, & UNEP. (2003). Etat du reporting sur le développement durable. Paris: Utopies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (1992). The globalization of business ethics: Why America remains different. California Management Review, 35(1), 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2006). The market for virtue: The potential and limits for corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., & Marais, M. (2012). A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance, 20(5), 432–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Maon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maon, F. (2015). Commanded Aspirations and Half-Hearted Enactment: The (Yet) Unfulfilled Promises of French-Style CSR. In: Idowu, S., Schmidpeter, R., Fifka, M. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13566-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics