Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1577 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace ((PESECST,volume 24))

Abstract

Critical Realism demonstrates a scientific and political value in future research on the sea South of China’s land border as an entity in and of itself without specific preset cultural boundaries. The ontological fallacy of conflating a sea as an existing reality with a given ideational corpus attached to it is closely linked to the structural elaboration of China’s ancient position in the maritime domain in contemporary terms, overwriting the hybrid cosmologies and epistemological frameworks that have shaped beliefs and actions in the charting of this maritime area. The management of conflicts emanating from this structural elaboration for future peaceful coexistence depends on an understanding of different situational logics that are crucial to reaching a compromise on the role and value of independent institutions, as well as the acknowledgement that cognitional processes have to be reoriented as a crucial part of transforming destructive tendencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In: The Diplomat; at: http://thediplomat.com/2015/05/u-s-japan-a-pacific-alliance-transformed/ (5 May 2015).

  2. 2.

    Mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, mutual non-aggression, non-interference in each other’s internal affairs, equality and mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence.

  3. 3.

    “Observe calmly; secure our position; cope with affairs calmly; hide our capacities and bide our time; be good at maintaining a low profile; and never claim leadership.” Global Security; at: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/24-character.htm (5 May 2015).

  4. 4.

    From China’s ‘peaceful development’ and ‘peaceful rise’, the Chinese Dream recently extended to the Asia–Pacific Dream, described as a “big country and global diplomacy with Chinese characteristics”. Bloomberg; at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-12-01/xi-says-china-will-keep-pushing-to-alter-asia-security-landscape (12 July 2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanh-Dam Truong .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Truong, TD., Knio, K. (2016). Conclusion. In: The South China Sea and Asian Regionalism. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace(), vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13551-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics