Advertisement

Mass Collaboration as Coevolution of Cognitive and Social Systems

  • Ulrike CressEmail author
  • Insa Feinkohl
  • Jens Jirschitzka
  • Joachim Kimmerle
Chapter
Part of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series book series (CULS, volume 16)

Abstract

When individuals and masses of people interact on online platforms in a collaborative effort, they enter into a bidirectional relationship and exert mutual influence on each other. Individuals determine the characteristics of the mass of users, but the masses also shape the behavior of the individual users. We present our “coevolution model of individual learning and collaborative knowledge construction” as a theoretical framework to describe and analyze the processes going on in this interaction. The model takes a systemic and cognitive view and describes mass processes as a dynamic and bidirectional process of structurally coupled self-organized systems. We propose two key processes that take place between the masses (as social system) and the individual (as cognitive system): (1) border-crossing processes that describe the exchange of information between an individual and a mass of people and (2) system drifts that capture long-term changes in the knowledge base of each system through internalization of new information as well as “forgetting” information over time. We apply the model to two examples of online platforms in the field, namely, Wikipedia and a specialist forum on nutrition (“Urkost forum”), as well as to supplementary laboratory studies, in order to demonstrate the processes underlying mass collaboration. We identify likely facilitative factors and flag potential dangers that occur in such processes of self-organization. Finally, we discuss potential implications for classroom settings and education.

Keywords

Mass collaboration Collaboration Cooperation Coevolution Learning Knowledge construction Self-organization 

References

  1. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bokhorst, F., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2014). How patterns support computer-mediated exchange of knowledge-in-use. Computers & Education, 71, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casey, G. (2013). Social media in the classroom. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 22, 5–24.Google Scholar
  4. Cress, U., Barquero, B., Schwan, S., & Hesse, F. W. (2007). Improving quality and quantity of contributions: Two models for promoting knowledge exchange with shared databases. Computers & Education, 49, 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cress, U., & Held, C. (2013). Harnessing collective knowledge inherent in tag clouds. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 29, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2007). Guidelines and feedback in information-exchange: The impact of behavioral anchors and descriptive norms in a social dilemma. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y. B., & Giang, M. T. (2016). Coding by choice: A transitional analysis of social participation patterns and programming contributions in the online Scratch community. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., & Held, C. (2010). The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: Technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building. Knowledge Management in Research & Practice, 8, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Cress, U., & Thiel, A. (2011a). A systems theoretical approach to online knowledge building. AI & Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, 26, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Harrer, A., & Cress, U. (2010). Visualizing co-evolution of individual and collective knowledge. Information, Communication and Society, 13, 1099–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50, 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2011). Using wikis for learning and knowledge building: Results of an experimental study. Educational Technology & Society, 14, 138–148.Google Scholar
  14. Kimmerle, J., Thiel, A., Gerbing, K.-K., Bientzle, M., Halatchliyski, I., & Cress, U. (2013). Knowledge construction in an outsider community: Extending the communities of practice concept. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1078–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Konz, F. (1999). Der große Gesundheitskonz. Berlin, Germany: Universitas.Google Scholar
  16. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston, MA: New Science Library/Shambhala.Google Scholar
  18. Meehan, R.J., Gravel, B.E., & Shapiro, B. A. (2014). Card-sorting task to establish community values in designing makerspaces. Retrieved from http://fablearn.stanford.edu/2014/wp-content/uploads/fl2014_submission_55.pdf
  19. Morgan, J. T., Mason, R. M., & Nahon, K. (2012). Negotiating cultural values in social media: A case study from Wikipedia. Maui, HI: 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS) Google Scholar
  20. Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2009). Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: Effects of incongruity between knowledge and information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oeberst, A., Halatchliyski, I., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Knowledge construction in Wikipedia: A systemic-constructivist analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Penuel, W. R., & Means, B. (2004). Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: Analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 294–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  25. Price, C. A., & Lee, H.-S. (2013). Changes in participants’ scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 773–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Roque, R., Rusk, N., & Resnick, M. (2016). Supporting diverse and creative collaboration in the Scratch online community. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro, R. B. (2016). Toward participatory discovery networks: A critique of current mass collaboration environments and a possible learning-rich future. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Sheridan, K. M., Rosenfeld Halverson, E., Litts, B. K., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 505–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Viegas, F. B.,Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004). Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. In Proceedings of SIGCHI’04 (pp. 575–582). Vienna, Austria: ACM.Google Scholar
  31. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrike Cress
    • 1
    Email author
  • Insa Feinkohl
    • 1
  • Jens Jirschitzka
    • 1
  • Joachim Kimmerle
    • 1
  1. 1.Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM), Knowledge Construction LabTuebingenGermany

Personalised recommendations