Advertisement

Exploring, Understanding, and Designing Innovative Socio-Technical Environments for Fostering and Supporting Mass Collaboration

  • Gerhard FischerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series book series (CULS, volume 16)

Abstract

Mass collaboration involving large number of people working and learning together is emerging in the digitally networked environment. Socio-technical environments fostering mass collaboration are facilitated by the technical infrastructure of the Internet, and they support collaborating participants to solve problems, share information, and engage in the joint construction of artifacts and knowledge. Based on our conceptual, empirical, and design-based research over the last decade, this chapter (1) explores needs and opportunities for mass collaboration, (2) outlines theoretical frameworks (including cultures of participation, meta-design, richer ecologies of participation, and different models for knowledge creation, accumulation, and sharing), (3) describes specific application domains (including CreativeIT Wiki, SAP Community Network, and massive open online courses), and (4) identifies research challenges grounded in findings “how things are” to provide design requirements for “how things could or should be” in the years to come.

Keywords

Collaboration Mass collaboration Socio-technical environments Meta-design Long-tail learning 

References

  1. Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York, NY: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  2. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. S. (2005). New learning environments for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.johnseelybrown.com/newlearning.pdf
  6. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, A. (2016). A brief history of mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, A., Fischer, G., Barron, B., Liu, C., & Spada, H. (2009). Long-tail learning: A unique opportunity for CSCL? In A. Dimitracopoulou, C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) 2009 (Vol. 2, pp. 22–24). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  10. Council, N. R. (1999). Being fluent with information technology. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cress, U., Feinkohl, I., Jirschitzka, J., & Kimmerle, J. (2016). Mass collaboration as co-evolution of cognitive and social systems. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Dick, H., Eden, H., & Fischer, G. (2009). Increasing and sustaining participation to support and foster social creativity. In N. Bryan-Kinns, M. D. Gross, H. Johnson, J. Ox, & R. Wakkary (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on creativity and cognition, Berkeley, CA (pp. 363–364). New York, NY: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenberg, M., & Fischer, G. (2014). MOOCs: A perspective from the learning sciences. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, … L. D’Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The 11th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014 (pp. 190–197). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  14. Elliott, M. (2016). Stigmergic collaboration: A framework for understanding and designing mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, G. (2002, December). Beyond “couch potatoes”: From consumers to designers and active contributors. Firstmonday: Peer-reviewed journal on the Internet, 7(12). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_12/fischer/
  16. Fischer, G. (2005). Distances and diversity: Sources for social creativity. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on creativity & cognition (pp. 128–136). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, G. (2009). Democratizing design: New challenges and opportunities for computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) 2009 (Vol. 1, pp. 282–286). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, G. (2011). Understanding, fostering, and supporting cultures of participation. ACM Interactions, XVIII, 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: Identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer, G., & Giaccardi, E. (2006). Meta-design: A framework for the future of end user development. In H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, & V. Wulf (Eds.), End user development (pp. 427–457). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischer, G., & Herrmann, T. (2011). Socio-technical systems: A meta-design perspective. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 3, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York, NY: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
  25. Gorman, A., & Fischer, G. (2009). Toward an analytic framework for understanding and fostering peer-support communities in using and evolving software products. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Communities and Technologies (C&T’09) Penn State University, June (pp. 1–9). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  26. Hirsch, E. D. (1996). The schools we need and why we don’t have them. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  27. Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  28. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory cultures: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kittur, A., Suh, B., & Chi, E. H. (2008). Can you ever trust a wiki? Impacting perceived trustworthiness in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’08) (pp. 477–480). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  30. Kvan, T. (2000). Collaborative design: What is it? Automation in Construction, 9, 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lanier, J. (2006). Digital Maoism: The hazards of the new online collectivism. Retrieved from http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier06/lanier06_index.html
  32. Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2008). The pro-am revolution: How enthusiasts are changing our economy and society. Retrieved from http://www.demos.co.uk/files/proamrevolutionfinal.pdf
  33. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Oeberst, A., Cress, U., Back, M., & Nestler, S. (2016). Individual versus collaborative information processing: The case of biases in Wikipedia. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Porter, J. (2008). Designing for the social web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar
  36. Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2009). The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 13–32.Google Scholar
  38. Raymond, E. S., & Young, B. (2001). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly & Associates.Google Scholar
  39. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  40. Rogoff, B., Matsuov, E., & White, C. (1998). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. R. Olsen & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching and schooling (pp. 388–414). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  45. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York, NY: Portofolio, Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  46. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for LifeLong Learning and Design (L3D), University of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations