Skip to main content

Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Networked Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mass Collaboration and Education

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 16))

Abstract

The present chapter advances a theoretical and analytical approach to networked knowledge that is continuously developed in large online communities of mass collaboration. Networked knowledge is regarded as substance with static structure that changes over longer periods of time through the activity of community participants. From a complex systems perspective, networked knowledge is an emergent phenomenon that amounts to more than the additive collection of individual artifacts and contributions due to their interconnectedness.

The empirical part of the chapter introduces an analytical approach examining large real-life data sets from the online communities Wikipedia and Wikiversity. The topological position of contributions and articles in different knowledge domains in the networks is evaluated through established network analysis metrics in order to identify pivotal artifacts that form the structural backbone of the networked knowledge.

One of the studies focuses on the relation between pivotal knowledge and the contribution experience of the community participants. The second study models the significance of pivotal knowledge structures for the network evolution and the new developing networked knowledge. In an explorative account of networked knowledge dynamics, the third study demonstrates a fine-grained approach to pivotal knowledge by acknowledging the historical trajectory of development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the world wide web: Methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of Documentation, 53, 404–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, B. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 1216–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C., & Cunningham, D. (1998). Searching for learner-centred, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centred technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 25–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckman, A. (2006). Learning in online communities. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 461–472). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., Stefanone, M., & Gay, G. (2002). Social network analysis of information sharing networks in a CSCL community. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the computer-supported collaborative learning conference (pp. 43–50). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U. (2013). Mass collaboration and learning. In R. Luckin, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, S. Puntambekar, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook on design in educational technology (pp. 416–425). London, England: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with Wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R.-J. (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for social network analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohn, N. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 343–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From Wikipedia to the classroom: Exploring online publication and learning. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 182–188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2008). Scaling consensus: Increasing decentralization in Wikipedia governance. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 157–157). Maui, HI: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London, England: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field: A course on the theory an application of bibliometric indicators. Budapest, Hungary: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtára. Retrieved from http://nsdl.niscair.res.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/968/1/Bib_Module_KUL.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halatchliyski, I., & Cress, U. (2014). How structure shapes dynamics: Knowledge development in Wikipedia—A network multilevel modeling approach. PLoS One, 9, e111958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halatchliyski, I., Hecking, T., Göhnert, T., & Hoppe, H. U. (2014). Analyzing the main paths of knowledge evolution and contributor roles in an open learning community. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1, 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halatchliyski, I., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2011). Divergent and convergent knowledge processes on Wikipedia. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 566–570). Hong Kong, China: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halatchliyski, I., Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halatchliyski, I., Oeberst, A., Bientzle, M., Bokhorst, F., & van Aalst, J. (2012). Unraveling idea development in discourse trajectories. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 162–166). Sydney, NSW, Australia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, H. U., Harrer, A., Göhnert, T., & Hecking, T. (2016). Applying network models and network analysis techniques to the study of online communities. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11, 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robinson, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: The MacArthur Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., & Held, C. (2010). The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: Technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 8, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerle, J., Thiel, A., Gerbing, K.-K., Bientzle, M., Halatchliyski, I., & Cress, U. (2013). Knowledge construction in an outsider community: Extending the communities of practice concept. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1078–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny, P. (2007). Wikis and Wikipedia as a teaching tool. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4, 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1999). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (pp. 72–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of computer supported collaborative learning. In J. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL, and implementing it in higher education (pp. 31–50). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lucio-Arias, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). The dynamics of exchanges and references among scientific texts, and the autopoiesis of discursive knowledge. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mali, F., Kronegger, L., Doreian, P., & Ferligoj, A. (2012). Dynamic scientific co-authorship networks. In A. Scharnhorst, K. Borner, & P. van den Besselaar (Eds.), Models of science dynamics (Understanding complex systems, pp. 195–232). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies-cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 47, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston, MA: New Science Library/Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2009). Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: Effects of incongruity between knowledge and information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Collaborative knowledge building with Wikis: The impact of redundancy and polarity. Computers & Education, 58, 1049–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederer, S., & Van Dijck, J. (2010). Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society, 12, 1368–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Nishiguchi, T. (2000). Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeberst, A., Halatchliyski, I., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Knowledge construction in Wikipedia: A systemic-constructivist analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 149–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor—An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2009). From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts—A trialogical approach to CSCL. In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 83–92). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1968). Epistemology without a knowing subject. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 52, 333–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, J. P. (2009). When the tenets of composition go public: A study of writing in Wikipedia. College Composition and Communication, 61, 383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2002). Social network analysis used for modeling collaboration in distance learning groups. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), ITS 2002 lecture notes in computer science, 2363 (pp. 31–40). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, P. (2009). Time is precious: Variable-and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, T., & Larsen, M. C. (2008). Networked identities: Understanding relationships between strong and weak ties in networked environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti, P. (2009). Knowledge networks: Structure and dynamics. In A. Pyka & A. Scharnhorst (Eds.), Innovation networks: Developing an integrated approach (pp. 19–41). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2012). Learning analytics: Envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice. In S. Buckingham Shum, D. Gasevic, & R. Ferguson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK’12 (pp. 4–8). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susi, T., & Ziemke, T. (2001). Social cognition, artifacts, and stigmergy: A comparative analysis of theoretical frameworks for the understanding of artifact-mediated collaborative activity. Cognitive Systems Research, 2, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning-making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computers-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D., & Verbert, K. (2013). Learning analytics as a “middle space”. In D. Suthers, K. Verbert, E. Duval, & X. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK’13 (pp. 1–4). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swarts, J. (2009). The collaborative construction of “fact” on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 281–288). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York, NY: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiner, G., Allen, C., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). Recognizing group cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 11, 378–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004). Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 575–582). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Foerster, H. (2003). Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press/Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. (2005). Measuring Wikipedia. In P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (Eds.), Proceedings of 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 221–231). Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining knowledge contribution in networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29, 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassermann, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and application. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1997). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. Contemporary Studies in Sociology, 15, 19–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wöhner, T., & Peters, R. (2009). Assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles with lifecycle based metrics. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iassen Halatchliyski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halatchliyski, I. (2016). Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Networked Knowledge. In: Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., Jeong, H. (eds) Mass Collaboration and Education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13535-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13536-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics