Altogether Now! Mass and Small Group Collaboration in (Open) Online Courses: A Case Study
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) become more and more popular. These course formats are typically highly flexible and attract large groups of learners from heterogeneous backgrounds. So far research in this area concentrating on success factors for low dropout rates and high satisfaction on the side of the learners in MOOCs is scarce. In this chapter, we describe experiences of a large online course offered to students of two large German universities. Based on theory drawn from a social psychological perspective on the relevance of social interaction for learning, we describe the background, structure, and specific elements of the MOOC-like course. We outline evaluation results of both small group collaboration (in workshops) and mass interaction (via forum and wiki usage) as well as results of the general evaluation of the overall course concept. We argue that the specific mixture of small and large group interaction as well as teacher- and learner-generated content is especially promising with regard to satisfaction, learning outcomes, and course completion rates.
KeywordsCollaboration Mass collaboration Massive open online courses Collaborative learning Learning in groups Wikis Online forums
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
- Bremer, C., & Weiß, D. (2013). Massive open online courses: Kategorisierung und Analyse des Teilnehmerverhaltens am Beispiel der OPCOs 2011 und 2012. In T. Köhler & N. Kahnwald (Eds.), Online communities, enterprise networks, open education and global communication. 16. Workshop GeNeMe’13 (pp. 305–316). Dresden, Germany: TUD Press.Google Scholar
- Chukwunonso, F., Ibrahim, R. B., Selamat, A. B., Idama, A., & Gadzama, W. A. (2013). The impact of the internet and the world wide web on distance and collaborative learning. In J. Terzakis, C. Paleologu, & T. Gyires (Eds.), ICCGI 2013, The Eighth International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (pp. 7–15). Wilmington, DE: International Academy, Research, and Industry Association.Google Scholar
- Gordon, N. (2014). Flexible pedagogies: Technology-enhanced learning. York, England: The Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
- Halawa, S., Greene, D., & Mitchell, J. (2014). Dropout prediction in MOOCs using learner activity features. ELearning Papers, 37, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Kumar, M. P., Packer, B., & Koller, D. (2010). Self-paced learning for latent variable models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 23, 1189–1197.Google Scholar
- Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 72–81). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Michinow, N., & Primois, C. (2005). Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 11–28.Google Scholar
- Neubaum, G., Wichmann, A., Eimler, S. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2014). Investigating incentives for students to provide peer feedback in a semi-open online course: An experimental study. Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration, OpenSym’14. New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2641580.2641604.
- Oeberst, A., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2016). What is knowledge? Who creates it? Who possesses it? The need for novel answers to old questions. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass Collaboration and Education. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Ounnas, A., Davis, H. C., & Millard, D. E. (2009). A framework for semantic group formation in education. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 43–55.Google Scholar
- Piezon, S. L., & Donaldson, R. L. (2005). Online groups and social loafing: Understanding student-group interactions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter84/piezon84.htm.
- Rheingold, H. R. (1991). Virtual reality. New York, NY: Summit Books.Google Scholar
- Schulmeister, R. (Ed.). (2013). MOOCs—Massive open online courses. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2, 3–10.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building. In B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 70–77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wellman, B. (1999). The network community: An introduction to networks in the global village. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 1–48). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., & Rose, C. P. (2013). Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in Massive Open Online Courses. Paper presented at NIPS Data-Driven Education Workshop, Lake Tahoe, NV. Retrieved from http://lytics.stanford.edu/datadriveneducation/papers/yangetal.pdf.
- Ziebarth, S., Neubaum, G., Kyewski, E., Krämer, N.C., Hoppe, H.-U., Hecking, T., & Eimler, S. C. (2015). Resource usage in online courses: Analyzing learner’s active and passive participation patterns. 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar