Skip to main content

Cultural Landscape Functions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landscape Analysis and Planning

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

The utilization and transformation of the landscape by humans is aimed at providing them with suitable conditions of living and development. What enables the accomplishment of particular human objectives is relevant functions of the cultural landscape. The following ten functions have been distinguished and described: spatial (consists in providing man with living and economic space), ecological (involves providing man as a living organism with the necessary physiological substances, that is, the environment suitable for living), nature protection (is to provide suitable ecological conditions for other living organisms), material supply (provides man with goods necessary for life and activity), energy supply (consists in equipping man with energy, necessary for the activity of processing), communicational (enables man to communicate, move in space, transport materials, energy and information), educational (enables human development, broadens their knowledge of man, society and living environment), recreational (provides human opportunities, improving health and mental state), sacred (meets the needs of a higher order, that is, spiritual) and aesthetical (provides human experience and aesthetic experience, necessary for spiritual and moral development and well-being). The optimization of the spectrum of functions of each landscape should be based on the principles of compatibility of the functions, their complementarity and the principle of necessity or priority of the function. The significance of the functional approach to the cultural landscape is justified, as it allows the application of the principles and methods of the system approach to the research into the landscape, which facilitates the management of the landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The author considers a cultural landscape as a synonym for the concept of an anthropogenic landscape. The range of the capacity of these two concepts is the same. The term of anthropogenic landscape emphasizes the fact that it is man who has contributed to its creation and development, whereas a cultural landscape refers more to the way man is shaping the landscape. Any human activity in the landscape, even of primitive man in the natural landscape , represents a specific ‘culture’, understood as the entirety of the methods of human action (influence) in the landscape resulting from the stage of their civilizational development and local environmental conditions. Therefore, the attempts to separate these concepts or make them subordinate seem unjustified, and in any case unproductive.

  2. 2.

    The issues of landscape functions have their own scientific history, although not very abundant in a number of publications and unambiguous formulations. In Poland, these issues are discussed in terms of a socio-economic function and services of the landscape (Richling and Solon 2011). The Russians also use the term социально-экономические функции ландшафта, distinguishing three types of functions: resource formation, environmental formation and nature conservation (Ochrana landszaftow 1982). In Germany, the concept similar to the function of the cultural landscape is the so-called landesfunctions of the landscape (Funktionen der Landschaft sozioökonomische).

  3. 3.

    This is an oversimplification, because tourism provides man also with some sensations (emotional experience).

References

  • Andreychouk V (2014) The evolution of globalsteme and contemporary geography. Diss Cult Lands Commun 23:9–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Myga-Piątek U (2005) Krajobraz w badaniach geograficznych (Landscape in geographical studies) Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego PTG 4:40–53 (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Myga-Piątek U (2012) Cultural landscape. Evolutionary ant typological aspects. University of Silesia, Katowice, p 406 (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochrana landszaftow (1982) Progress, Moskwa, p 270

    Google Scholar 

  • Plit F (2011) Krajobraz kulturowy – czym jest?. Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa, p 112

    Google Scholar 

  • Richling A, Solon J (2011) Ekologia Krajobrazu (Landscape ecology). PWN, Warszawa, p 464 (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczyńska E, Wilczyński W (2004) Geografia. Podręcznik dla szkół średnich (Geography. A course book for secondary schools). Polska Oficyna Wydawnicza BGW, Warszawa, p 233 (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viacheslav Andreychouk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andreychouk, V. (2015). Cultural Landscape Functions. In: Luc, M., Somorowska, U., Szmańda, J. (eds) Landscape Analysis and Planning. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13527-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics