A Framework to Assess the Controllability of Wetting on Unsaturated Collapsible Soils

  • C. Mihalache
  • G. BuscarneraEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)


The paper focuses on the process of wetting-induced compaction in unsaturated soils. While such forms of irreversible deformation are referred to as collapses, a mechanical interpretation based on concepts of material stability has not yet been provided. Here we use a critical state plasticity model and an expression of second-order energy input accounting for changes in fluid pressures and/or volume fractions. Soaking-induced compaction is then simulated and interpreted in light of the controllability theory. Our results suggest that wetting-compaction is not necessarily associated with the loss of uniqueness of the incremental response. Compaction is indeed predicted not to be controllable only in soils that undergo considerable plastic strains upon wetting. In these cases, plastic models with enhanced hydraulic hardening predict the possibility of a loss of control of the water injection process, according to which the applied stress is no longer sustainable because of the degradation of the mechanical properties.


Unsaturated Soil Matric Suction Constitutive Matrix Incremental Response Suction Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work has been supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation, Geomechanics and Geomaterials Program, under Grant Nos. CMMI-1234031 and CMMI-1351534.


  1. Alonso EE, Gens A, Josa A (1990) A constitutive model for partially saturated soils. Géotechnique 40(3):405–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruchon JF, Pereira JM, Vandamme M, Lenoir N, Delage P, Bornert M (2013) Full 3D investigation and characterisation of capillary collapse of a loose unsaturated sand using X-ray CT. Granul Matter 15(6):783–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buscarnera G, di Prisco C (2012) Discussing the definition of the second-order work for unsaturated soils. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 36(1):36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buscarnera G, Nova R (2009) An elastoplastic strainhardening model for soil allowing for hydraulic bonding–debonding effects. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 33(8):1055–1086CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Gens A, Sánchez M, Sheng D (2006) On constitutive modelling of unsaturated soils. Acta Geotech 1(3):137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Imposimato S, Nova R (1998) An investigation on the uniqueness of the incremental response of elastoplastic models for virgin sand. Mech Cohesive-Frictional Mater 3(1):65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jennings JEB, Burland JB (1962) Limitations to the use of effective stresses in partly saturated soils. Géotechnique 12(2):125–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Amer J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations