Advertisement

Hierarchy of Failure Indicators in the Failure Analysis of Geomaterials

  • Richard WanEmail author
  • Xu Gong
Conference paper
  • 1.5k Downloads
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

The failure of geomaterials presents distinctive features that arise from material response being dependent on pressure, density and fabric. In conventional plasticity, these dependencies are described by a non-associated plastic flow rule which provides mathematical sources for material or constitutive instability, thereby admitting a multiplicity of material responses for the same initial loading history. The non-symmetry of the tangent constitutive matrix due to non-associated plasticity triggers different failure indicators during material response history, leading to various failure modes such as diffuse or localized. The genesis of failure is analysed in a finite element computation of a drained compression test on sand in plane strain as a boundary value problem.

Keywords

Failure Indication Tangent Constitutive Matrix Drained Compression Tests Diffuse Failure Displacement Step Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is jointly funded by the Computer Modelling Group (CMG) and the Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada through a CRD grant.

References

  1. Bigoni D, Hueckel T (1991) Uniqueness and localization—I. Associative and non-associative elastoplasticity. Int J Solids Struct 28(2):197–213CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Darve F (1994) Stability and uniqueness in geomaterials constitutive modelling. In: Chambon et al (eds) Localisation and bifurcation theory for soils and rocks. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 73–88Google Scholar
  3. Desrues J (1990) Shear band initiation in granular materials: experimentation and theory. In: Darve F (ed) Geomaterials constitutive equations and modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 283–310Google Scholar
  4. Hill R (1958) A general theory of uniqueness and stability in elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 6(3):236–249CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Nicot F, Darve F (2006) Micro-mechanical investigation of material instability in granular assemblies. Int J Solids Struct 43(11–12):3569–3595CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Pinheiro M (2009) Constitutive and computation aspects of localized and diffuse instabilities in geomaterials. PhD thesis, Dept Civil Eng, University of Calgary, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  7. Rudnicki JW, Rice JR (1975) Condition for the localization of deformation in pressure sensitive dilatant material. J Mech Phys Solids 23(6):371–394Google Scholar
  8. Wan RG, Guo PJ (1998) A simple constitutive model for granular soils: modified stress-dilatancy approach. Comput Geotech 22(2):109–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wan R, Pinheiro M, Daouadji A, Jrad M, Darve F (2013) Diffuse instabilities with transition to localization in loose granular materials. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 37(10):1292–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations