Abstract
Taxation needs justification. Therefore, it is subject to arguments about justice and equality. In terms of normative ethics, justice takes the lead. The article is divided into four parts: I. Formal Relations of Justice. II. Material Principles of Justice. III. Consequences for the Justice of Taxation. IV. International/Global Justice of Taxation. The justice of the contribution/taxation depends first on the distribution of goods made possible by the particular community in which taxation takes place. Fundamental for any ethics is the principle of normative individualism/humanism: Only individuals can be the ultimate point of reference of moral obligations and hence the justificatory source of ethics, politics and law. In order to balance conflicting interests the “principle of the relative dependence of individual concerns on others” is proposed: The more the origins or the realization of the concerns or the interests of a morally considerable individual depend on others or a community, the more the respective concerns and interests have to be relativized in the process of deliberation, and the more the community may decide according to its common goals. This principle is applied to the justice of taxation. As a basic principle of taxation, a limited equivalence/benefit-principle is defended. The ability principle can only provide some additional considerations. Income can be taxed more extensively than consumption and wealth. A progressive income tax is defended.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See also, for an initial main evaluation according to equality and proportionality (that is justice), Adam Smith (1776, 350 ff.). Apart from these ethical requirements one needs to take into account other requirements like certainty, efficiency in collecting taxes etc.
- 2.
For an early expression, see Henry David Thoreau (1993, p. 18): “There will never be a really free and enlightened State, until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly.”
- 3.
See for a formulation by a law-commentary for practitioners: Kirchhof (2013, p. 1 f.).
- 4.
For a formulation by a law-commentary for practitioners, see Kirchhof (2013, p. 3).
- 5.
See for a defense of a progressive inheritance tax: Koller (2013).
References
Aristotle. 1984. Nichomachean Ethics. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Vol. 1 + 2, (ed. Jonathan Barnes). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Black, Carola. 2010. Eigentumsfreiheit und Besteuerung aus liberaler Perspektive. Eine Untersuchung der Steuerpolitik auf Grundlage der Eigentumstheorie von Locke und Kant. Berlin: Lit.
Frank, Robert. 1999. Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. New York: Free Press.
Frank, Robert. 2007. Falling behind: How rising inequality harms the middle class. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press
Frank, Robert. 2008. Should public policy respond to positional externalities? Journal of Public Economics 92:1777–1786.
Frank, Robert. 2011. The Darwin economy: Liberty, competition, and the common good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gaisbauer, Helmut P., Otto Neumaier, Gottfried Schweiger, and Clemens Sedmak eds. 2013. Erbschaftssteuer im Kontext. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Kirchhof, Paul. 2013. Einkommensteuergesetz. Kommentar. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt.
Koller, Peter. 2013. Plädoyer für progressive Erbschaftssteuern. In Erbschaftssteuer im Kontext, ed. Helmut P. Gaisbauer, Otto Neumaier, Gottfried Schweiger and Clemens Sedmak, 59–79. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Locke, John. 1991. Two treatises of Government (Ed. by Peter Laslett). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marx, Karl. 1974. Kritik des Gothaer Programms, MEW 19. Berlin: Dietz-Verlag.
Murphy, Liam, and Thomas Nagel. 2002. The myth of ownership. Taxes and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Plato. Eutyphro. 1990a. Werke 1. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Plato. Gorgias. 1990b. Werke 2. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Plato. Charmides. 1990c. Werke 1. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Plato. Politeia. 1990d. Werke 4. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Plato. Alcibiades. 1990e. Werke 1, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Rawls, John. 1973. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, Adam. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Tan, Kok-Chor. 2012. Justice, institutions, and luck: the site, ground, and scope of equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, Aquinas. 1987. Recht und Gerechtigkeit/Summa theologiae II-II. Bonn: IfG Verlagsgesellschaft.
Thomas, Aquinas. 1993. Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Transl C. I. Litzinger. Indiana: Dumb Ox Books.
Thoreau, Henry David. 1993. Civil disobedience. In id. Civil disobedience and other essays. New York: Dover Publications.
von der Pfordten, Dietmar. 2006. Ist staatliche Folter als fernwirkende Nothilfe ethisch erlaubt? In Darf der Staat ausnahmsweise foltern?, ed. Wolfgang Lenzen, 149–172. Paderborn: Mentis.
von der Pfordten, Dietmar. 2008. On the structures of justice and its application to global justice. In Political practices and international order, ed. Hans G. Ulrich and Stefan Heuser, 168–183. Münster: LIT-Verlag.
von der Pfordten, Dietmar. 2010. Normative Ethik. Berlin: de Gruyter.
von der Pfordten, Dietmar. 2012. Five elements of normative ethics, a general theory of normative individualism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15:449–471.
Weston, Stephen F. 1903. Principles of justice in taxation. New York: The Columbia University Press.
Wingert, Lutz. 2012. Mit Steuern steuern? Steuern zwischen Effizienz und Gerechtigkeit. In Steuern und Umverteilen. Effizienz versus Gerechtigkeit?, ed. Gisela Hürlimann, 83–104. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag an der ETH Zürich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von der Pfordten, D. (2015). Justice, Equality and Taxation. In: Gaisbauer, H., Schweiger, G., Sedmak, C. (eds) Philosophical Explorations of Justice and Taxation. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 40. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13458-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13458-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13457-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13458-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)