Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diatom Indices and Water Quality Index of the Cauvery River, India: Implications on the Suitability of Bio-Indicators for Environmental Impact Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Management of River Basin Ecosystems

Part of the book series: Springer Earth System Sciences ((SPRINGEREARTH))

Abstract

Physico-chemical properties of water are routinely utilized for understanding environmental quality. Diatoms are used as bio-indicators to assess the water quality of surface waters. Independent assessments of environmental quality of the surface waters from the Cauvery River were made and the resultant quality-indicators were assessed in the light of national river water quality standards. Occurrences of sixty (60) species belonging to 21 genera are recorded from the Cauvery River. Water samples were analyzed for various physico-chemical parameters, viz., pH, Electrical Conductivity (μS/cm), Dissolved solid (mg/l), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) (mg/l), Calcium (Ca) (mg/l), Magnesium (Mg) (mg/l), Sodium (Na) (mg/l), Potassium (K) (mg/l), Chloride (Cl) (mg/l), Bicarbonate (HCO3) (mg/l) and Sulphate (SO4) (mg/l). These physico-chemical parameters formed the basis of computing the Water Quality Index. The results of the present study on diatom assemblages in the Cauvery River revealed moderate pollution at Siluvampalayam and Koneripatti and high levels of pollution at Peramachipalayam, Kottampatty, Sanyasipatti and Bhavani. The Water Quality Index revealed pristine nature of the Cauvery River water in upstream regions that became unsuitable for human consumption downstream of Bhavani Town. The values of DO and BOD levels indicated absence of major organic pollution. Comparative validation of the physico-chemistry and bio-indicators suggested sensitive nature of the Diatom indices to environmental variables and thus the diatom indices can be a reliable tool for environmental impact assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berger WH, Parker FL (1970) Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments, Science 168:1345–1347

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargave DS (1983) Use of water quality index for river classification and zoning of Ganga River. Environ Poll Serv B Chem Phys 6:51–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton PW, Currie JC, Tervet DJ, Welch WT (1978) An index to improve water quality classification. Water Pollut Control 77:271–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Cemagref (1982) Etude des methods biologiques d’appré- ciation quantitative de la qualitédes eaux. Rapport Q. E. Lyon, Agence de l’eau Rhöne-Me´diterrane´e- Corse-Cemagref. Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Coste M, Ayphassorho H (1991) Étude de la qualité deseaux du Bassin Artois-Picardie àl’aide des communautés de diatomées benthiques (application des indices diatomiques). Rapport Cemagref. Bordeaux-Agence de l’Eau Artois- Picardie, Douai

    Google Scholar 

  • Cude C (2001) Oregon water quality index: a tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(1):125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DellUomo A (1996) Assessment of water quality of an Apennine river as a pilot study. In: Whitton BA, Rott E (eds), Use of algae for monitoring rivers II. Institut fu¨ r Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, pp 65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Descy JP, Coste M (1991) A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Lim 24:2112–2116

    Google Scholar 

  • Eloranta P, Soininen J (2002) Ecological status of some Finnish rivers evaluated using benthic diatom communities. J Appl Phycol 14:177

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi HP (1957) A contribution to our knowledge of the diatom genus Pinnularia. Nat Soc J 54:845–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi HP (1959) Fresh-water Diatoms from Sagar in the Mysore State. J Ind Bot 38:305–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi HP (1998) Freshwater Diatoms of central Gujarat. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi HP (1961) Notes on the Diatomaceae of Ahmedabad and its environs. Hydrobiologia 17:218–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi HP (1962) Notes on the Diatomaceae from Ahmedabad and its environs- IV—The diatom communities of some freshwater pools and ditches along Sarkhej Road. Phykos 1:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi HP (1967) Notes on Diatomaceae from Ahmedabad and its environs. VI. On some diatoms from fountain reservoirs of Seth Sarabhai’s Garden. Hydrobiologia 30:248–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez N, Licursi M (2001) The Pampean Diatom Index (IDP) for assessment of rivers and streams in Argentina. Aquat Ecol 35:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House MA (1989) A Water quality index for river management. J Inst Water Environ Manage. 3:336–344. doi:10.1007/s10653-005-9001-5

  • House MA, Ellis JB (1987) The development of water quality indices for operational management, Water Sci Technol 19:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Karthick B, Krithika H, Alakananda B (2008) Short guide to common freshwater Diatom Genera (Poster). Energy and Wetlands Research Group, CES, IISc, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Karthick B, Alakananda B, Ramachandra TV (2009) Diatom based pollution monitoring in urban wetlands of Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, Envis Technical Report—560012, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Karthick B, Taylor JC, Mahesh MK, Ramachandra TV (2010) Protocols for collection, preservation and enumeration of Diatoms from aquatic habitats for water quality monitoring in India. IUP J Soil Wat 3(1):25–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly MG, Whitton BA (1995) The Trophic Diatom index: a new index for monitoring Eutrophication in rivers. J Phy 7:433–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Kell MG, Cazaubon A, Coring E, Dell’Uomo A, Ector L, Goldsmith B, Guasch H, Hürlimann J, Jarlman A, Kawecka B, Kwandrans J, Laugaste R, Lindstrom EA, Leitao M, Marvan P, Padisak J, Pipp E, Prygiel J, Rott E, Sabater S, Dam VH, Vizinet J (1998) Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J Phy 10:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly M, Juggins S, Guthrie R et al (2008). Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biol 53:403–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerq L, Maquet B (1987) Deux nouveaux indices chimique et diatomique de qualite´ d’eau courante. Application au Samson et àses affluents (bassin de la Meuse belge). Comparaison avec d’autres indices chimiques, bioce´notiques et diatomiques. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, documented travail 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. 2nd English edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir A, Coste M (1996) Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the French National Water Board network. In: Whitton BA, Rott E (eds) Use of algae for monitoring rivers II. Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, pp 29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou S, Lo S, Wang S (2004) A generalized water quality index for Taiwan. Environ Monitor Assess 96:35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1988) Statistical ecology: a primer of methods and computing. John Wiley and Sons, xviii, pp 337

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller WW, Joung HM, Mahannah CN, Garrett JR (1986) Identification of water quality differences Nevada through index application. J Environ Qual 15:265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell MK, Stapp WB (1996) Field manual for water quality monitoring: an environmental educational program for schools. Thomson-Shore Inc, Dextor, p 277

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasiri F, Maqsiid I, Haunf G, Fuller N (2007) Water quality index: a fuzzy river pollution decision support expert system. J Water Resour Plann Manage 133:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesce SF, Wunderlin DA (2000) Use of water quality indices to verify the impact of Cordoba City (Argentina) on Suquira river. Water Res 34:2915–2926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prygiel J, Leveque L, Iserentant R (1996) Un nouvel indice diatomique pratique pour l’évaluation de la qualité des eaux en réseau de surveillance. Rev Sci Eau 1:97–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Rott E (1991) Methodological aspects and perspectives in the use of periphyton for monitoring and protecting rivers. In: Whitton, BA, Rott, E, Friedrich G (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers. Institut fur Botanik, Univ. Innsbruck, pp 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Said A, Stevens D, Selke G (2004) An innovative index for water quality in streams. Environ Manage 34:406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele S, Schreiner C (1991) Use of diatoms for monitoring nutrient enrichment acidification and impact salts in Germany and Austria. In: Whitton BA, Rott E, Friedrich G (eds) Use of algae for monitoring rivers. Institüt für Botanik, Univ. Innsbruk

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha S, Kazama F (2007) Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji river Basin, Japan. Environ Model Softw 22(4):464–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sladecek V (1986) Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 14:555–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoermer EF, Smol JP (eds) (1999) The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoermer EF, Pilskaln CH, Schelske CL (1995) Siliceous microfossil distribution in the surficial sediments of Lake Baikal. J Pal 14:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JC, Harding WR, Archibald CGM (2007) An illustrated guide to some common diatom species from South Africa. WRC Report TT 282/07. Water Research Commission, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedy RK, Goe PK (1986) Chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies. Environmental Publications, Karad, p 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega M, Pardo R, Barrado E, Deban L (1998) Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the quality of river water byex ploratory data analysis. Water Res 32(12):3581–3592. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00138-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalapathy R, Karthikeyan P (2012) Environmental impact assessment of Cauvery river with Diatoms at Bhavani, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Geol Earth Environ Sci 2(3):36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalapathy R, Karthikeyan P (2013a) Physical, chemical and environmental studies on Cauvery river in parts of Tamil Nadu (Mettur and Bhavani). Univ J Environ Res 3(3):415–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalapathy R, Karthikeyan P (2013b) Diatoms assemblages distribution in Cauvery Bhavani rivers, Tamil Nadu in relation to chemical and physiographical factors. Res J Chem Sci 3(11):55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalapathy R, Karthikeyan P (2013c) A taxonomic and morphological study of fresh water Diatom species Synedra ulna (Nitzsch) Ehrenberg in Cauvery river at Bhavani region, Tamil Nadu, India. Int Res J Environ Sci 2(11):18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalapathy R, Karthikeyan P (2013d) Benthic Diatoms in river influenced by urban pollution, Bhavani region, Cauvery river, South India. Int J Innovative Technol Exploring Eng 2(3):206–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalapathy R, Karthikeyan P (2014) Diatom indices for water quality assessment in Cauvery river, Tamil Nadu, India. Gondwana Geol Mag 15(2014):109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Asai K, Houki A (1986) Numerical estimation of organic pollution of flowing waters by using the epilithic diatom assemblage-Diatom Assemblage Index (DIApo). Sci Total Environ 55:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelinka M, Marvan P (1961) Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewässer. Arch Hydrobiol 57:389–407

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology, Periyar University, Salem, 636 011, India

    R. Venkatachalapathy & P. Karthikeyan

Authors
  1. R. Venkatachalapathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Karthikeyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Karthikeyan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. and South East Asia Carbonate Laboratory (SeaCarl), Universiti Teknologi Petronas,, Periyar University,Depatment of Geology,Salem,India, Tronoh, Malaysia

    Mu. Ramkumar

  2. Department of Geography, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India

    K Kumaraswamy

  3. Department of Environmental Management, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India

    R. Mohanraj

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Venkatachalapathy, R., Karthikeyan, P. (2015). Diatom Indices and Water Quality Index of the Cauvery River, India: Implications on the Suitability of Bio-Indicators for Environmental Impact Assessment. In: Ramkumar, M., Kumaraswamy, K., Mohanraj, R. (eds) Environmental Management of River Basin Ecosystems. Springer Earth System Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13425-3_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation