Skip to main content

Toward Relational Empowerment: Interpersonal Neurobiology, Couples, and the Societal Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: AFTA SpringerBriefs in Family Therapy ((BRIEFSFAT))

Abstract

Neuroscience demonstrates that humans are relational creatures with social brains. Yet, societal expectations of ultra-individualism catch many couples in cycles of conflict, negativity, and reactivity. Helping couples understand the link between their gendered power interactions, emotions, and sociocultural context is vital so that they can become less reactive toward each other and more proactive in sharing relational processes of attunement and vulnerability that promote relationship satisfaction and personal well-being. Drawing upon the latest research from neuroscience, we examine emotions and their link to gender and power in couple interactions. A case example illustrates the complex interplay of neurobiological and societal influences on partner emotions and empathy and how attending to these processes can lead to change that supports enhanced relational connection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2013). The essential difference: Male and female brains and the truth about autism. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckes, L., & Coan, J. A. (2011). Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 976–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Ulrich, D. (1981). Contextual family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 159–186). New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaisson, E. (1989). The life era. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional neuroarchitecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, L. (2009). Pink brain, blue brain: How small differences grow into troublesome gaps—and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbane, M. D. (2007). Wired to connect: Neuroscience, relationships, and therapy. Family Process, 6(3), 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbane, M. D. (2008). “News from neuroscience”: Applications to couple therapy. In M. E. Edwards (Ed.), Neuroscience and family therapy: Integrations and applications. Washington, DC: American Family Therapy Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbane, M. D. (2011). Facilitating relational empowerment in couple therapy. Family Process, 50, 337–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbane, M. D. (2013). Loving with the brain in mind: Neurobiology and couple therapy. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B. (2001). The limits of a technical concept of a good marriage: Exploring the role of virtue in communication skills. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 327–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. (2013). Love 2.0: Creating happiness and health in moments of connection. New York, NY: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (2011). The science of trust: Emotional attunement for couples. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M. (2011). Gender development and the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 69–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V. (2010). Relational-cultural therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., & Surrey, J. L. (1991). Women’s growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Young, R. M. (2010). Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D. (2009). Born to be good: The science of a meaningful life. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J. K., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudson-Martin, C. (2012). Changing gender norms in families and society: Toward equality and complexities. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (4th ed., pp. 324–346). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2010). A socio-emotional approach to couple therapy: Linking social context and couple interaction. Family Process, 49, 369–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lips, H. M. (1991). Women, men, and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1999). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J., & Biven, L. (2012). The archeology of mind: Neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinkman, M., & Fishbane, M. D. (2004). The vulnerability cycle: Working with impasses in couple therapy. Family Process, 43, 279–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. J. (2007). The mindful brain: Reflection and attunement in the cultivation of well-being. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2003). The tending instinct: Women, men, and the biology of relationships. New York, NY: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G., & Maio, G. R. (2008). Man, I feel like a woman: When and how gender-role motivation helps mind-reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1165–1179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uvnas-Moberg, K. (2003). The oxytocin factor: Tapping the hormone of calm, love, and healing. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P. J. (2012). The moral molecule: The source of love and prosperity. New York, NY: Dutton/Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 American Family Therapy Academy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fishbane, M.D., Wells, M.A. (2015). Toward Relational Empowerment: Interpersonal Neurobiology, Couples, and the Societal Context. In: Knudson-Martin, C., Wells, M., Samman, S. (eds) Socio-Emotional Relationship Therapy. AFTA SpringerBriefs in Family Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13398-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics