Skip to main content

Approaches to Integrated Diabetes Care: United States: San Francisco

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Integrated Diabetes Care

Abstract

In the US, the most important advance in integrated primary care for patients with diabetes and other chronic conditions has been the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model. A major goal of the PCMH is to provide care that is coordinated and/or integrated across all elements of the complex health-care system (including subspecialty care, hospitals, home health agencies, nursing homes) and the patient’s community (including the patient’s family and community-based services). The PCMH model includes multiple features aimed at better integrated care, including care managers/coordinators, patient registries, improved access, regular reporting of quality measures, patient access to electronic health information, and payment restructuring to support these activities. Patient participation in their care is now seen as an essential element of integrated care. Research has shown the increasing patient participation though education, self-management support and health coaching can improve patient care processes and outcomes for patients with diabetes. Realizing the potential of integrated care is particularly challenging for patients with diabetes in urban and rural underserved populations. Work at our institution (University of California, San Francisco) and the San Francisco Department of Public Health illustrates those challenges and has led to new and newly adapted approaches for providing integrated care, including health coaching, electronic referrals, automated telephone support, patient care teams registries of patients with diabetes, and practice transformation using the ten Building Blocks of High-Performing Primary Care model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Selvin E, Parrinello CM, Sacks DB, Coresh J. Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2010. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(8):517–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. El Achhab Y, Nejjari C, Chikri M, Lyoussi B. Disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments among adults diabetic: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80(2):171–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, Dudl RJ, Lees J, Mullan J, Jackson RA. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):626–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Narayan KM, Gregg EW, Fagot-Campagna A, Gary TL, Saaddine JB, Parker C, Imperatore G, Valdez R, Beckles G, Engelgau MM. Relationship between quality of diabetes care and patient satisfaction. J Natl Med Assoc. 2003;95(1):64–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1:2–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(1):75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parchman ML, et al. Risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes and the delivery of care consistent with the chronic care model in primary care settings: a STARNet study. Med Care. 2007;45:1129–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DiPiero A, Dorr DA, Kelso C, Bowen JL. Integrating systematic chronic care for diabetes into an academic general internal medicine resident-faculty practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(11):1749–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Piatt GA, Orchard TJ, Emerson S, Simmons D, Songer TJ, Brooks MM, Korytkowski M, Siminerio LM, Ahmad U, Zgibor JC. Translating the chronic care model into the community: results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:811–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCulloch DK, Price MJ, Hindmarsh M, Wagner EH. A population-based approach to diabetes management in a primary care setting: early results and lessons learned. Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1(1):12–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith SA, Shah ND, Bryant SC, Christianson TJ, Bjornsen SS, Giesler PD, et al. Chronic care model and shared care in diabetes: randomized trial of an electronic decision support system. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(7):747–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stock S, Pitcavage JM, Simic D, Altin S, Graf C, Feng W, Graf TR. Chronic care model strategies in the United States and Germany deliver patient-centered, high-quality diabetes care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(9):1540–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stellefson M, Dipnarine K, Stopka C. The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sunaert P, Bastiaens H, Nobels F, Feyen L, Verbeke G, Vermeire E, De Maeseneer J, Willems S, De Sutter A. Effectiveness of the introduction of a chronic care model-based program for type 2 diabetes in Belgium. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nutting PA, Dickinson WP, Dickinson LM, Nelson CC, King DK, Crabtree BF, Glasgow RE. Use of chronic care model elements is associated with higher-quality care for diabetes. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(1):14–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM, et al. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA. 2006;296:427–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pimouguet C, Le Goff M, Thiébaut R, Dartigues JF, Helmer C. Effectiveness of disease-management programs for improving diabetes care: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2011;183(2):E115–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Davidson MB. How our current medical care system fails people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:370–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Krein SL, Klamerus ML, Vijan S, et al. Case management for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med. 2004;116:732–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Choe HM, Mitrovich S, Dubay D, Hayward RA, Krein SL, Vijan S. Proactive case management of high risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by a clinical pharmacist: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:253–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ishani A, Greer N, Taylor BC, Kubes L, Cole P, Atwood M, Clothier B, Ercan-Fang N. Effect of nurse case management compared with usual care on controlling cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(8):1689–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, et al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization: efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:2011–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peterson KA, Radosevich DM, O’Connor PJ, Nyman JA, Prineas RJ, Smith SA, Arneson TJ, Corbett VA, Weinhandl JC, Lange CJ, Hannan PJ. Improving diabetes care in practice: findings from the TRANSLATE trial. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2238–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Polonsky WH, Earles J, Smith S, et al. Integrating medical management with diabetes self-management training: a randomized control trial of the diabetes outpatient intensive treatment program. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3048–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fleming B, Silver A, Ocepek-Welikson K, Keller D. The relationship between organizational systems and clinical quality in diabetes care. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(12):934–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Solberg LI, Asche SE, Pawlson LG, Scholle SH, Shih SC. Practice systems are associated with high-quality care for diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(2):85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC, Stewart E, Jaén C. Transforming physician practices to patient-centered medical homes: lessons from the national demonstration project. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:439–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. American College of Physicians. The advanced medical home: a patient-centered, physician-guided model of health care. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 2005. Position Paper. [cited 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: https://www.acponline.org/advocacy/current_policy_papers/assets/adv_med.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  31. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Physicians (ACP), American Osteopathic Association (AOA). Joint principles of the patient-centered medical home. 2007. [Cited 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/practice_management/pcmh/initiatives/PCMHJoint.pdf

  32. Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ. 2000;320:569–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Coleman K, Phillips KE, Sugarman JR. Improving care coordination in primary care. Med Care. 2014;52:S33–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bojadzievski T, Gabbay RA. Patient-centered medical home and diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(4):1047–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. National Committee on Quality Assurance. Patient-Centered Medical Home. [Cited 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.ncqa.org/Programs/Recognition/Practices/PatientCenteredMedicalHomePCMH/NewVersionofPCMH.aspx

  36. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Defining the PCMH. [cited 2015 Jun 22]. Available from: https://pcmh.ahrq.gov/page/defining-pcmh

  37. Stange KC, Nutting PA, Miller WL, Jaén CR, Crabtree BF, Flocke SA, Gill JM. Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:601–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Care Coordination Standards. McColl Institute 2011. [Cited 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/downloads/1_ncqa_care_coordination_process_measures.pdf

  39. Daniel DM, Wagner EH, Coleman K, et al. Assessing progress toward becoming a patient-centered medical home: an assessment tool for practice transformation. Health Serv Res. 2013;48:1879–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Jortberg BT, Miller BF, Gabbay RA, Sparling K, Dickinson WP. Patient-centered medical home: how it affects psychosocial outcomes for diabetes. Curr Diabet Rep. 2012;12(6):721–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Paulus RA, Davis K, Steele GD. Continuous innovation in health care: implications of the Geisinger experience. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27:1235–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Friedberg MW, Rosenthal MB, Werner RM, Volpp KG, Schneider EC. Effects of a medical home and shared savings intervention on quality and utilization of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(8):1362–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. McCarthy D, Mueller K, Tillmann I. HealthPartners: consumer-focused mission and collaborative approach support ambitious performance improvement agenda. New York: The Commonwealth Fund Publication; 2009. p. 1250. [Cited 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/files/publications/case-study/2009/jun/1250_mccarthy_healthpartners_case_study_61_for-pf.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Steiner BD, Denham AC, Ashkin E, Newton WP, Wroth T, Dobson Jr LA. Community care of North Carolina: improving care through community health networks. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6:361–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Colorado PCMH Multi-Payer. Multi-state pilot: a year in review. [cited 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: https://www.pcpcc.org/webinar/cmd-colorado-pcmh-multi-payer-multi-state-pilot-year-review

  46. Alidina S, Schneider EC, Singer SJ, Rosenthal MB. Structural capabilities in small and medium-sized patient-centered medical homes. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(7):e265–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Reid RJ, Coleman K, Johnson EA, Fishman PA, Hsu C, Soman MP, et al. The group health medical home at year two: cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):835–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jaén CR, Ferrer RL, Miller WL, Palmer RF, Wood R, Davila M, et al. Patient outcomes at 26 months in the patient-centered medical home national demonstration project. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(1 Suppl):S57–67. S92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Miller BF, Kessler R, Peek CJ, Kallenberg GA. A national research agenda for research in collaborative care: papers from the collaborative care research network research development conference. AHRQ Publication No. 11-0067. 2011. [Cited 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/collaborativecare/

  50. Jaber LA, Halapy H, Fernet M, Tummalapalli S, Diwakaran H. Evaluation of a pharmaceutical care model on diabetes management. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30:238–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Johnson KA, Chen S, Cheng IN, Lou M, Gregerson P, Blieden C, et al. The impact of clinical pharmacy services integrated into medical homes on diabetes-related clinical outcomes. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:1877–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Choe HM, Bernstein SJ, Mueller BA, Walker PC, Stevenson JG, Standiford CJ. Pharmacist leads primary care team to improve diabetes care. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66(7):622–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bodenheimer T, Willard-Grace R, Ghorob A. Expanding the roles of medical assistants: who does what in primary care? JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1025–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bennett HD, Coleman EA, Parry C, Bodenheimer T, Chen EH. Health coaching for patients with chronic illness. Fam Pract Manag. 2010;17:24–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ghorob A. Health coaching: teaching patients how to fish. Fam Pract Manag. 2013;20(3):40–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Naik AD, Palmer N, Petersen NJ, Street RL, Rao R, Suarez-Almazor M, Haider P. Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in diabetes mellitus group clinics. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(5):453–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Willard-Grace R, Thom DH, Hessler D, Bodenheimer T, Chen EH. Health coaching to improve control of diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia for low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2015;28(1):38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(8):507–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Thom DH, Ghorob A, Hessler D, De Vore D, Chen EH, Bodenheimer T. Peer health coaching improves glycemic in low-income patients with diabetes: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11:137–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Spencer MS, Rosland AM, Kieffer EC, Sinco BR, Valerio M, Palmisano G, et al. Effectiveness of a community health worker intervention among African- American and Latino adults with type 2 diabetes. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2253–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Philis-Tsimikas A, Fortmann A, Lleva-Ocana L, Walker C, Gallo LC. Peer-led diabetes education programs in high-risk Mexican Americans improve glycemic control compared with standard approaches: a Project Dulce promotora randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(9):1926–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Philis-Tsimikas A, Walker C, Rivard L, et al. Improvement in diabetes care of underinsured patients enrolled in Project Dulce. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. California Health Workforce Alliance (CHWA), Taking Innovation to scale: community health workers, promoters, and the triple aim. A statewide assessment of the roles and contributions of California’s community health workers. Preliminary findings, observations, and recommendations. Public Health Institute/California Health Workforce Alliance 2013. [cited 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: www.calhealthworkforce.org

  64. Coventry P, Lovell K, Dickens C, Bower P, Chew-Graham C, McElvenny D, Hann M, Cherrington A, Garrett C, Gibbons CJ, Baguley C, Roughley K, Adeyemi I, Reeves D, Waheed W, Gask L. Integrated primary care for patients with mental and physical multimorbidity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or cardiovascular disease. BMJ. 2015;350:h638.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Katon W, Russo J, Lin EH, Schmittdiel J, Ciechanowski P, Ludman E, Peterson D, Young B, Von Korff M. Cost-effectiveness of a multicondition collaborative care intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(5):506–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Knowles SE, Chew-Graham C, Adeyemi I, Coupe N, Coventry PA. Managing depression in people with multimorbidity: a qualitative evaluation of an integrated collaborative care model. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Barello S, Graffigna G, Vegni E. Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:905934.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Graffigna G, Barello S, Libreri C, Bosio CA. How to engage type-2 diabetic patients in their own health management: implications for clinical practice. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Carman KL, Dardess P, Mauer M, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32:223–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):207–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4 Pt 1):1005–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Greene J, Hibbard JH, Sacks R, Overton V, Parrotta CD. When patient activation levels change, health outcomes and costs change, too. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34(3):431–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Bolen SD, Chandar A, Falck-Ytter C, Tyler C, Perzynski AT, Gertz AM, Sage P, Lewis S, Cobabe M, Ye Y, Menegay M, Windish DM. Effectiveness and safety of patient activation interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(8):1166–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung W, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005;8:34–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Dy SM. Instruments for evaluating shared medical decision making: a structured literature review. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:623–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, Kriston L, Niebling W, Harter M. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Pat Educ Counsel. 2007;67:324–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Hood K, Robling M, Atwell C, Russell I, Wensing M, Grol R, Study Steering Group. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21(4):337–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Legare F, Stacey D, Pouliot S. Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model. J Interprofess Care. 2011;25:18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Bodenheimer T, Ghorob A, Willard-Grace R, Grumbach K. The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:166–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Willard R, Bodenheimer T. The building blocks of high-performing primary care: lessons from the field. California HealthCare Foundation April 2012. [Cited 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.chcf.org/publications/2012/04/building-blocks-primary-care

  83. Ghorob A, Bodenheimer T. Sharing the care to improve access to primary care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1955–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Balkhi AM, Reid AM, Westen SC, Olsen B, Janicke DM, Geffken GR. Telehealth interventions to reduce management complications in type 1 diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2015;6:371–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Marcolino MS, Maia JX, Alkmim MB, Boersma E, Ribeiro AL. Telemedicine application in the care of diabetes patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e79246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ, Mah CA, Kraemer FB, Crapo LM. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? Am J Med. 2000;108(1):20–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Schillinger D, Hammer H, Wang F, Palacios J, McLean I, Tang A, Youmans S, Handley M. Seeing in 3-D: examining the reach of diabetes self-management support strategies in a public health care system. Health Educ Behav. 2008;35(5):664–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Schillinger D, Handley M, Wang F, Hammer H. Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes: a three-arm practical clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(4):559–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Ratanawongsa N, Handley MA, Sarkar U, Quan J, Pfeifer K, Soria C, Schillinger D. Diabetes health information technology innovation to improve quality of life for health plan members in urban safety net. J Ambul Care Manag. 2014;37(2):127–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Chen AH, Kushel MB, Grumbach K, Yee Jr HF. Practice profile. A safety-net system gains efficiencies through “eReferrals” to specialists. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:969–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Chen AH, Murphy EJ, Yee Jr HF. eReferral – a new model for integrated care. New Engl J Med. 2013;368:2450–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Straus SG, Chen AH, Yee Jr H, Kushel MB, Bell DS. Implementation of an electronic referral system for outpatient specialty care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1337–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Scheibe MM, Imboden JB, Schmajuk G, Margaretten M, Graf JD, Chen AH, Yelin EH, Yazdany J. Efficiency gains for rheumatology consultation using a novel electronic referral system in a safety net health setting. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67(8):1158–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Sewell JL, Day LW, Tuot DS, Alvarez R, Yu A, Chen AH. A brief, low-cost intervention improves the quality of ambulatory gastroenterology consultation notes. Am J Med. 2013;126(8):732–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Pereira K, Phillips B, Johnson C, Vorderstrasse A. Internet delivered diabetes self-management education: a review. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(1):55–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. McIlhenny CV, Guzic BL, Knee DR, Wendekier CM, Demuth BR, Roberts JB. Using technology to deliver healthcare education to rural patients. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11:1798.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Avdal EU, Kizilci S, Demirel N. The effects of web-based diabetes education on diabetes care results: a randomized control study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(2 Suppl):Tc29–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K, Green M, Jernigan VB, Case S. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1275–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Kim CJ, Kang DH. Utility of a web-based intervention for individuals with type 2 diabetes: the impact on physical activity levels and glycemic control. Comput Inform Nurs. 2006;24:337–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Noh JH, Cho YJ, Nam HW, Kim JH, Kim DJ, Yoo HS, Kwon YW, Woo MH, Cho JW, Hong MH, Yoo JH, Gu MJ, Kim SA, An KE, Jang SM, Kim EK, Yoo HJ. Web-based comprehensive information system for self-management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12:333–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Song M, Choe MA, Kim KS, Yi MS, Lee I, Kim J, Lee M, Cho YM, Shim YS. An evaluation of web-based education as an alternative to group lectures for diabetes self-management. Nurs Health Sci. 2009;11:277–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King D, Dickman JM, Faber AJ, Halterman E, Woolley T, Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Estabrooks PA, Osuna D, Ritzwoller D. Twelve-month outcomes of an Internet-based diabetes self-management support program. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87:81–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, Hoath J, Mullen M, Cheadle A, Goldberg HI. Web-based collaborative care for type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(2):234–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. McMahon GT, Gomes HE, Hohne SH, Hu TM-J, Levine BA, Conlon PR. Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(7):1624–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Bond GE, Burr RL, Wolf FM, Feldt K. The effects of a web-based intervention on psychosocial well-being among adults aged 60 and older with diabetes: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ. 2010;36(3):446–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Azar M, Gabbay R. Web-based management of diabetes through glucose uploads: has the time come for telemedicine? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;83(1):9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. McMahon GT, Fonda SJ, Gomes HE, Alexis G, Conlin PR. A randomized comparison of online- and telephone-based care management with internet training alone in adult patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(11):1060–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, Cao J, Chen J, Mo X, Huang J, Wang L, Gu D. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011;28(4):455–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Bell AM, Fonda SJ, Walker MS, Schmidt V, Vigersky RA. Mobile phone-based video messages for diabetes self-care support. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(2):310–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Salber P, Niksch A. Digital health tools for diabetes. J Ambul Care Manag. 2015;38(2):196–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Quinn CC, Clough SS, Minor JM, Lender D, Okafor MC, Gruber-Baldini. A WellDoc mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10(3):160–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Quinn CC, Gruber-Baldini AL, Shardell M, Weed K, Clough SS, Peeples M, Terrin M, Bronich-all L, Barr E, Lender D. Mobile diabetes intervention study: testing a personalized treatment/behavioral communication intervention for blood glucose control. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(4):334–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML, Barr EA, Ballew SH, Gruber-Baldini AL. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(9):1934–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Nundy S, Dick JJ, Chou CH, Nocon RS, Chin MH, Peek ME. Mobile phone diabetes project led to improved glycemic control and net savings for Chicago plan participants. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(2):265–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Clarke RM, Tseng CH, Brook RH, Brown AF. Tool used to assess how well community health centers function as medical homes may be flawed. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(3):627–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Bray P, Cummings DM, Morrissey S, Thompson D, Holbert D, Wilson K, Lukosius E, Tanenberg R. Improved outcomes in diabetes care for rural African Americans. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(2):145–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Moore K, Jiang L, Manson SM, Beals J, Henderson W, Pratte K, Acton KJ, Roubideaux Y. Case management to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in American Indians and Alaska Natives with diabetes: results from the Special Diabetes Program for Indians Healthy Heart Demonstration Project. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(11):e158–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J, Teresi J, Palmas W, Field L, et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnicity diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:40–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Shane-McWhorter L, Lenert L, Petersen M, Woolsey S, McAdam-Marx C, Coursey JM, Whittaker TC, Hyer C, LaMarche D, Carroll P, Chuy L. The Utah remote monitoring project: improving health care one patient at a time. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(10):653–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Rogers EA, Hessler D, Dube K, Willard-Grace R, Gupta R, Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. The panel management questionnaire: a tool to measure panel management capability. Perm J. 2015;19(2):4–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Edwards ST, Landon BE. Medicare’s chronic care management payment – payment reform for primary care. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2049–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Bindman AB. Nudging medical practice change one regulation at a time. JAMA. 2015;313:1197–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Gilmer TP, Philis-Tsimikas A, Walker C. Outcomes of Project Dulce: a culturally specific diabetes management program. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(5):817–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Gilmer TP, Roze S, Valentine WJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of diabetes case management for low-income populations. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(5):1943–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Brown 3rd HS, Wilson KJ, Pagan JA, Arcari CM, Martinez M, Smith K, Reininger B. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a community health worker intervention for low-income Hispanic adults with diabetes. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Brownson CA, Hoerger TJ, Fisher EB, Kilpatrick KE. Cost-effectiveness of diabetes self-management programs in community primary care settings. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35(5):761–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Piette JD, Heisler M, Wagner TH. Cost-related medication underuse among chronically ill adults: the treatments people forgo, how often, and who is at risk. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1782–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Hoerger TJ. Using costs in cost-effectiveness models for chronic diseases: lessons from diabetes. Med Care. 2009;47(7 Suppl 1):S21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Thom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thom, D.H., Bodenheimer, T. (2017). Approaches to Integrated Diabetes Care: United States: San Francisco. In: Simmons, D., Wenzel, H., Zgibor, J. (eds) Integrated Diabetes Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13389-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13389-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13388-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13389-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics