Cognitive Bias, ABM and Emergence of China Stock Market

  • Guo-cheng WangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings in Adaptation, Learning and Optimization book series (PALO, volume 1)


Why, what and how real behavior(s) should be incorporated into ABM (Agent-Based Modeling), and is it appropriate and effective to use ABM with HS-CA collaboration and micro-macro link features for complex economy/finance analysis? Through deepening behavioral analysis and using computational experimental methods incorporating HS (Human Subject) into CA (Computational Agent), which is extended ABM, based on the theory of behavioral finance and complexity science as well, we constructed a micro-macro integrated model with the key behavioral characteristics of investors as an experimental platform to cognize the conduction mechanism of complex capital market and typical phenomena in this paper, and illustrated briefly applied cases including the internal relations between impulsive behavior and the fluctuation of stock’s, the asymmetric cognitive bias and volatility cluster, deflective peak and fat-tail of China stock market.


Cognitive Bias of Investors Behavioral Macro-financial Model ABM 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arthur, B.: Economic Agents that Behave like Human Agents. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2000(3), 1–22 (1993); Reprinted in The Legacy of Joseph A. Schumpeter, H. Hanusch (ed.) Edward Elgar Publishers (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camerer, C.F., Ho, T., Chong, J.K.: A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3), 861–898 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duffy, J.: Agent-based models and human subject experiments. In: Tesfatsion, L., Judd, K.L. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, pp. 949–1011. Elsevier, North-Holland (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farmer, J.D., Foley, D.: The economy needs agent-based modeling. Nature 460, 685–686 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Grauwe, P.: Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Macroeconomics. CESifo Economic Studies 56, 465–497 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hommes, C.H.: Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. In: Tesfatsion, L., Judd, K.L. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics. Agent-based computational economics, vol. 2. Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    LeBaron, B.: Agent-based computational finance. In: Tesfatsion, L., Judd, K.L. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics, pp. 1187–1233. Elsevier (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    LeBaron, B.: Heterogeneous gain learning and the dynamics of asset prices. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 83, 424–445 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lengnick, M., Wohltmann, H.W.: Agent-based financial markets and New Keynesian macroeconomics: a synthesis. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 8(1), 1–32 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levin, D.: Is Behavioral Economics Doomed? The Ordinary versus the Extraordinary. Openbook Publishers, UK (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lux, T.: Stochastic Behavioral Asset-Pricing Models and the Stylized Facts. In: Hens, T., Schenk-Hoppé, K.R. (eds.) Handbook of Financial Markets: Dynamics and Evolution, ch. 3, pp. 161–215 (2009); De Grauwe, P.: Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Macroeconomics. CESifo Economic Studies 56, 465–497 (2010) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller John, H., Scott, E., Page: Complex Adaptive Systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton University Press, NJ (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheffknecht, L., Geiger, F.: A behavioral macroeconomic model with endogenous boom-bust cycles and leverage dynamcis. FZID Discussion Papers 37-2011, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schweitzer, F., et al.: Economic Networks: The New Challenges. Science 325(5939), 422–425 (2009)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shao, P.: Bounded rationality, cognitive hierarchy and investment game. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics 10, 145–155 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, G.: Exploring complex economy to develop quantitative economics from Micro-behavior perspective. Journal of Quantitative Economics 2(1), 102–120 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, G.: The evolvement and beyond of rationalism in modern economics. Social Sciences in China (7), 66–82 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, G.: Deepening micro-behavioral analysis and exploring the complexity of macro-economy. Jiangsu Social Sciences (3), 20–28 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, G.: Behavioral Macro-Financial Modeling from Investor’s Bias with Applications — Based on the Experiment of Incorporating HS and CA. Journal of Management Science & Statistical Decision 11(1), 24–40 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, G., Long, Y.: Study on Emergence of Capital Market with Cognitive Hierarchy and Extensive Agent-Based Modeling— An Application of e-Science in Social Sciences. E-Science Technology & Application 5(1), 83–92 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang, W., Zhang, Y.J., Xiong, X.: Agent-based Computational Finance. Science Press, Beijing (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics (IQTE)Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations