Advertisement

Multi-objective Heterogeneous Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows and Simultaneous Pickup and Delivery for Urban Last Mile Logistics

  • Chen Kim HengEmail author
  • Allan N. Zhang
  • Puay Siew Tan
  • Yew-Soon Ong
Part of the Proceedings in Adaptation, Learning and Optimization book series (PALO, volume 1)

Abstract

The Urban Last Mile Logistics (LML) is known to be the most expensive, least efficient and most polluting section of the supply chain. To that extent, a multi-objective heterogeneous capacitated vehicle routing problem with time windows and simultaneous pickup and delivery (MoHCVRPTWSPD) is formulated and solved to cater to this section of the supply chain. The proposed model is solved through two proposed methods that are based on exact methods. A small benchmark was adopted from the current literature to test the proposed methods and computational results are reported. Based on the computational results, a number of insights into the MoHCVRP-TWSPD problem are provided.

Keywords

last mile vehicle routing time window simultaneous pickup and delivery capacitated heterogeneous logistics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dantzig, G.B., Ramser, J.H.: The truck dispatching problem. Management Science 6(1), 80–91 (1959)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angelelli, E., Mansini, R.: The vehicle routing problem with time windows and simultaneous pick-up and delivery. In: Quantitative Approaches to Distribution Logistics and Supply Chain Management, pp. 249–267. Springer (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang, M.-S., Chen, S., Hsueh, C.-F.: Real-time vehicle routing problem with time windows and simultaneous delivery/pickup demands. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 5, 2273–2286 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gutiérrez-Jarpa, G., et al.: A branch-and-price algorithm for the vehicle routing prob-lem with deliveries, selective pickups and time windows. European Journal of Operational Research 206(2), 341–349 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mingyong, L., Erbao, C.: An improved differential evolution algorithm for vehicle routing problem with simultaneous pickups and deliveries and time windows. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 23(2), 188–195 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, H.-F., Chen, Y.-Y.: A genetic algorithm for the simultaneous delivery and pickup problems with time window. Computers & Industrial Engineering 62(1), 84–95 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Desrosiers, J., et al.: Time constrained routing and scheduling. In: Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 8, pp. 35–139 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Solomon, M.M.: Algorithms for the vehicle routing and scheduling problems with time window constraints. Operations Research 35(2), 254–265 (1987)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gélinas, S., et al.: A new branching strategy for time constrained routing problems with application to backhauling. Annals of Operations Research 61(1), 91–109 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bektaş, T., Laporte, G.: The Pollution-Routing Problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45(8), 1232–1250 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin, C., et al.: Survey of Green Vehicle Routing Problem: Past and future trends. Expert Systems with Applications 41(4), 1118–1138 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jozefowiez, N., Semet, F., Talbi, E.-G.: Multi-objective vehicle routing problems. European Journal of Operational Research 189(2), 293–309 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sutcliffe, C., Boardman, J.: Optimal solution of a vehicle-routeing problem: transporting mentally handicapped adults to an adult training centre. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61–67 (1990)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hong, S.-C., Park, Y.-B.: A heuristic for bi-objective vehicle routing with time window constraints. International Journal of Production Economics 62(3), 249–258 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sessomboon, W., et al.: A study on multi-objective vehicle routing problem considering customer satisfaction with due-time (the creation of Pareto optimal solutions by hybrid genetic algorithm). Transaction of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murata, T., Itai, R.: Local search in two-fold EMO algorithm to enhance solution similarity for multi-objective vehicle routing problems. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 201–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Geiger, M.J.: Genetic algorithms for multiple objective vehicle routing. arXiv preprint arXiv:0809.0416 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giannikos, I.: A multiobjective programming model for locating treatment sites and routing hazardous wastes. European Journal of Operational Research 104(2), 333–342 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bowerman, R., Hall, B., Calamai, P.: A multi-objective optimization approach to urban school bus routing: Formulation and solution method. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 29(2), 107–123 (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    El-Sherbeny, N.: Resolution of a vehicle routing problem with multi-objective simulated annealing method. Faculté Polytechnique de Mons (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Safaei, N., Gholipour, Y.: A hybrid simulated annealing for capacitated vehicle routing problems with the independent route length. Applied Mathematics and Computation 176(2), 445–454 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moura, A.: A multi-objective genetic algorithm for the vehicle routing with time windows and loading problem. In: Intelligent Decision Support, pp. 187–201. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cordeau, J.-F., et al.: VRP with time windows. The Vehicle Routing Problem 9, 157–193 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hickman, J., et al.: Methodology for calculating transport emissions and energy consumption (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bisschop, J.: AIMMS-optimization modeling. Lulu. com (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen Kim Heng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Allan N. Zhang
    • 1
  • Puay Siew Tan
    • 1
  • Yew-Soon Ong
    • 2
  1. 1.Singapore Institute of Manufacturing TechnologyA*STARSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations