Advertisement

Formative Self-assessment to Support Self-driven Mathematics Education at University Level

  • Giovannina AlbanoEmail author
  • Leke Pepkolaj
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8699)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss how to exploit the use of the module Quiz, available in any e-learning platform, to improve mathematics competencies of engineering students. The use of quizzes aims to improve the learning process during its progress. Our use of self-assessment has combined with traditional lectures, as benefit, since it allows self-driven recovery learning paths. Much attention has been paid to construct effective close-ended questions apt to actually evaluate competencies and not only contents. Quizzes are also used as an effective tool to improve learning and overcome incorrect beliefs.

Keywords

Mathematics Quiz Learning paths 

References

  1. 1.
    Albano, G., Ferrari, P.L.: Mathematics education and e-learning: meaningful use of the quiz-modules. In: Faggiano, E., Montone, A. (eds.) Proceedings of ICTMT11 (International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching), pp. 53–58. Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartalini, T.: Quality of learning and teaching mathematics with Computer Aided Assessment. Ph.D. thesis in computer science, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conradie, J., Frith, J.: Comprehension tests in mathematics. Educ. Stud. Math. 42, 225–235 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duval, R.: The cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in the learning of mathematics. Educ. Stud. Math. 61(1), 103–131 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferrari, P.L.: Mathematical language and advanced mathematics learning. In: Johnsen Høines, M., Berit Fuglestad, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 2, pp. 383–390. Bergen University College Press, Bergen (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Movshovitz-Hadar, N., Zaslavsky, O., Inbar, S.: An empirical classification model for errors in high school mathematics. J. Res. Math. Educ. 18(1), 3–14 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Niss, M.: Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In: Gagatsis, A., Papastavridis, S. (eds.): 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education, 3–5 Jan 2003, pp. 115–124. Hellenic Mathematical Society, Athens (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pellerey, M.: L’eredità di Luigi Calonghi nella ricerca pedagogico-didattica (2012). http://www.giombattistaamenta.it/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Pellerey-Leredita%CC%80-di-Luigi-Calonghi1.pdf
  9. 9.
    Radatz, H.: Error analysis in mathematics education. J. Res. Math. Educ. 10(3), 163–172 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roediger III, H.L., Putnam, A.L., Smith, M.A.: Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In: Mestre, J.P., Ross, B.H. (eds.) Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 55. Elsevier Inc., San Diego (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DIEM – Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Ingegneria Elettrica e Matematica ApplicataUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly
  2. 2.CRMPA - Centro di Ricerca in Matematica Pura e ApplicataFiscianoItaly

Personalised recommendations