Skip to main content

Peer-Review from Learners’ Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover New Horizons in Web Based Learning (ICWL 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8699))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Within the framework of a broad four-year study with 550 participants in the fields of e-business and business informatics that was conducted at a German and an Austrian university, different media-based learning methods and their effects were compared. In order to be able to draw comparisons with other learning methods, a game-based learning scenario (Beer Game), a case study that was worked on in interuniversity groups and documented in a Wiki as well as peer-review were factored into the study. This article focuses on different pedagogical and technical varieties of implementation of a peer-review learning scenario as well as the qualitative analysis of students’ feedback and improvement suggestions. Compared with other media-based learning scenarios, the peer-review method was rated surprisingly positive in most respects. However, the suggestions for improvement analyzed for the present study mainly concerned a lack of anonymity in courses with a small number of participants, a lack of knowledge on the part of the reviewers, a wish for more reviews, the possibility to defend one’s paper after the review and a wish for examples what good peer reviews look like. Furthermore the study mirrors the progress that was achieved in the recent past of the peer-review tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Breuer, F., Schreier, M.: Lehren und Lernen qualitativer Forschungsmethoden. In: Mey, G., Mruck, K. (Hrsg.) Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, U., Steinert, A.: Networked Learning in a Networked World (2010). http://netzwerklernen.wikispaces.com/file/view/Ehlers_Steinert_NETWORKED+LEARNING+IN+A+NETWORKED+WORLD.doc

  • Ge, Z.: Exploring e-learners’ perceptions of net-based peer-reviewed English writing. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 6(1), 75–91 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, M.A.; Katzlinger, E.: Peer Review als aktivierende Lernmethode in der universitären Lehre. Moodlemoot 23. 2. 2012, Linz (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoidn, S.: Lernkompetenzen an Hochschulen fördern. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung-Prähauser, V., Wieden-Bischof, D.: Theorie und Praxis zu E-Portfolios in der Hochschule. In: Hugger, K.-U, Walber, M. (Hrsg.) Digitale Lernwelten. Konzepte, Beispiele und Perspektiven, pp. 245–268. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou, H.-C., Peng, Z.-Y.: Training effects on computer-mediated peer review. System 37(2009), 514–525 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R., Baier, C.: Die Konstruktion der soziologischen Realität durch Forschungsrating. Berliner J. für Soziologie 2009(19), 295–313 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, L., Kotzé, T.G.: Supersizing e-learning: What a CoI survey reveals about teaching presence in a large online class. Internet High. Educ. 13, 45–51 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neidhardt, W.: Selbststeuerung der Wissenschaft: Peer Review. In: Simon, D., Knie, A., Hornbostel, S. (Hrsg.) Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik, pp. 280–292. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinmann, G., Sippel, S., Spannagel, C.: Peer Review für Forschen und Lernen. Funktionen, Formen, Entwicklungschancen und die Rolle der digitalen Medien. In: Mandel, S., Rutishauser, M., Seiler Schiedt, E. (Hrsg.) Digitale Medien für Lehre und Forschung, pp. 218–229. Waxmann Verlag, Münster (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., Mor, Y., Gaved, M., Whitelock, D.: Innovating Pedagogy 2012: Open University Innovation Report 1, Milton Keynes: The Open University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautmann, N.M.: Interactive learning through web-mediated peer review of student science reports. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 57(5), 685–704 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenha-Rela, M., Carvalho, R.: Work in progress: self evaluation through monitored peer review using the moodle platform. In: 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA, Session T2D, pp. 26–27 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Katzlinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Katzlinger, E., Herzog, M.A. (2014). Peer-Review from Learners’ Perspective. In: Cao, Y., Väljataga, T., Tang, J., Leung, H., Laanpere, M. (eds) New Horizons in Web Based Learning. ICWL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13296-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13296-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13295-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13296-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics