Advertisement

Designing Interactive Scratch Content for Future E-books

  • Mario MäeotsEmail author
  • Leo Siiman
  • Margus Pedaste
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8699)

Abstract

In the current paper we propose a framework for designing interactive content to make future e-books more dynamic. The problem with typical e-books today is that they seem to have a lack of interactivity. Considering the rapid advancement of digital technology there are many opportunities to change this situation. We focus on using the multimedia authoring tool Scratch as an option to create interactive content. The Scratch platform is valuable because content can be easily created, shared, embedded in websites and even possibly embedded in future e-books. Thus it opens up a possibility for making e-books more interactive and dynamic. Scratch by its very nature also promotes the constructivist pedagogy of learning by design. The framework we propose for designing interactive Scratch content was derived from creating a specific Scratch model to teach biology content. However, the framework is a promising start to producing interactive content that can apply potentially to any subject.

Keywords

E-books Learning by design Digital learning material Interactive simulations Visual programming environments 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Scratch models used in this research were produced in the context of a project Biodigi (http://www.biodigi.edu.ee/), financed by the European Social Fund. We would like to thank Meelis Brikker who created all drawings for the models.

References

  1. 1.
    Wieman, C.E., Adams, W.K., Perkins, K.K.: PhET: simulations that enhance learning. Science 322, 682–683 (2008). doi: 10.2307/20145153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Jong, T., Lazonder, A., van Joolingen, W., Wasson, B., Vold, V., Hovardas, T., Giemza, A.: Using scenarios to design complex technology-enhanced learning environments. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 60, 883–901 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9258-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mäeots, M., Pedaste, M., Sarapuu, T.: Developing students’ transformative and regulative inquiry skills in a computer-based simulation. In: Paper presented at the 8th IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education, Phuket, Thailand, 16–18 March 2009Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang, Y., Liang, T., Su, Y., Chen, N.: Empowering personalized learning with an interactive e-book learning system for elementary school students. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 60, 703–722 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9237-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuhl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Gemballa, S.: Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? Comput. Educ. 56, 176–187 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Renkl, A., Atkinson, R.K.: Interactive learning environments: contemporary issues and trends. An introduction to the special issue. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 235–238 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9052-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prince, M.J., Felder, R.M.: Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases. J. Eng. Educ. 95, 123–138 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vreman-de Olde, C., de Jong, T., Gijlers, H.: Learning by designing instruction in the context of simulation-based inquiry learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 16, 47–58 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bollen, L., van Joolingen, W.: SimSketch: multiagent simulations based on learner-created sketches for early science education. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 6, 208–216 (2013). doi: 10.1109/TLT.2013.9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., Eastmond, E.: The Scratch programming language and environment. Trans. Comput. Educ. 10, 1–15 (2010). doi: 10.1145/1868358.1868363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    López-Ortega, O.: Computer-assisted creativity: emulation of cognitive processes on a multi-agent system. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 3459–3470 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bravo, C., van Joolingen, W., de Jong, T.: Modeling and simulation in inquiry learning: checking solutions and giving intelligent advice. Simulation 82, 769–784 (2006). doi: 10.1177/0037549706074190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, Y.: Scratch: Multimedia programming environment for young gifted learners. Gifted Child Today 34, 26–31 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scaffidi, C., Chambers, C.: Skill progression demonstrated by users in the Scratch animation environment. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 28, 383–398 (2012). doi: 10.1080/10447318.2011.595621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siiman, L.A., Pedaste, M., Tõnisson, E., Sell, R., Jaakkola, T., Alimisis, D.: A review of interventions to recruit and retain ICT students. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. 28, 383–398 (2014). doi: 10.1080/10447318.2011.595621 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maloney, J.J., Burd, L.L., Kafai, Y.Y., Rusk, N.N., Silverman, B.B., Resnick, M.M.: Scratch: a sneak preview [education]. In: Proceedings Second International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating Through Computing, p. 104 (2004). doi: 10.1109/C5.2004.1314376
  17. 17.
    Estonian National Curriculum for Upper Secondary Schools. Appendix 4: Natural Science, p. 12 (2011). http://www.hm.ee/index.php?popup=download&id=11228

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social Sciences and Education, Centre for Educational TechnologyInstitute of Education, University of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations