Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Safe Use of Chemicals and Risk Prevention in the Finnish Chemical Industry’s Work Places

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Occupational Safety and Health Management

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine how HSE (health, safety and environment) managers and the workers’ OSH representatives view the following topics: (1) safe use of chemicals, (2) prevention prioritizations and measures of management, (3) collective climates of OSH in systems thinking and (4) discourses on legislation about chemical safety. It was hoped to clarify their potential effects by evaluating organizational relationships and technical measures of OSH. Forty-nine HSE managers and 105 workers’ OSH representatives responded to an online survey questionnaire. In the regression analysis of HSE managers and workers’ OSH representatives, both the prevention prioritizations and the measures of management displayed a highly significant (p < 0.001) effect on safe use of chemicals. With respect to safe use of chemicals, the following factors were found: Factor 1—Training, Factor 2—OSH Policies and Factor 3—Work processes. With respect to prevention prioritizations, the following factors were found: Factor 1—Technology, Factor 2—Assessments and documents and Factor 3—Control. For measures of management, the factors were: Factor 1—Leadership, Factor 2—Assessments and Factor 3—Utilization of measures. Qualitative results in the discourses detected an improvement with respect to compliance with OSH legal demands, need of information and cooperation between different governmental inspectorates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker III JA, Bowman FL, Erwin G, Gorton S, Hendershot D, Leveson N, Priest S, Rosenthal I, Tebo PV, Wiegmann DA, Wilson LD (2007) The report of the BP U.S, refineries independent safety review panel. The baker report. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/Baker_panel_report.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2014

  • Baram M (2007) Liability and its influence on designing for product and process safety. Saf Sci 45(1–2):11–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan J, Kiihne GM (2009) A little knowledge is a dangerous thing—unexpected reaction case studies make the case for technical discipline. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(6):757–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BS 8800 (2004) Occupational health and safety management systems-guide. British Standard Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli A, Friedman Y, Tishler A (2013) Cultivating a resilient top management team: the importance of relational connections and strategic decision comprehensiveness. Saf Sci 51(1):148–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherns A (1976) Principles of socio-technical design. Hum Relat 29(8):783–792. http://hum.sagepub.com/content/29/8/783.full.pdf+html. Accessed 18 June 2014

  • DeJoy DM, Della LJ, Vandenberg RJ, Wilson MG (2010) Making work safer: testing a model of social exchange and safety management. J Saf Res 41(2):163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulac N, Leveson N (2004) An approach to design for safety in complex systems. In: International conference on system engineering (INCOSE ‘04), Toulouse, June 2004, 14 pp. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/papers/incose-04.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2014

  • Edwards K, Jensen PL (2014) Design of systems for productivity and wellbeing. Special issue: systems ergonomics/human factors. Appl Ergon 45(1):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Directive (1998) EU Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Official Journal L 13, 5.5.1998, pp 11–23. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31998L0024:EN:HTML. Accessed 18 June 2014

  • Gadd SA, Keeley DM, Balmforth HF (2004) Pitfalls in risk assessment: examples from the UK. Saf Sci 42(9):841–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin MA, Neal A (2000) Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol 5(3):347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greimas AJ (1987) On meaning: selected writings in semiotic theory. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimas AJ (1990) The social sciences: a semiotic view. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimas AJ, Courtes J (1982) Semiotics and language: an analytical dictionary. Indiana UP, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote G (2012) Safety management in different high-risk domains—all the same? Saf Sci 50(10):1983–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote G, Künzler C (2000) Diagnosis of safety culture in safety management audits. Saf Sci 34(1–3):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale AR, Swuste P (1998) Safety rules: procedural freedom or action constraint? Saf Sci 29(3):163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale AR, Heming BHJ, Smit K, Rodenburg FGTh, van Leeuwen ND (1998) Evaluating safety in the management of maintenance activities in the chemical process industry. Saf Sci 28(1):21–4445(1–2):305–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale A, Kirwan B, Kjellén U (2007) Safe by design: where are we now? Saf Sci 45:305–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale AR, Guldenmund FW, van Loenhout PLCH, Oh JIH (2010) Evaluating safety management and culture interventions to improve safety: effective intervention strategies. Saf Sci (48)8:1026–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Hébert L (2011) Tools for text and image analysis: an introduction to applied semiotics. Université du Québec à Rimouski, Quebec. http://www.signosemio.com/documents/Louis-Hebert-Tools-for-Texts-and-Images.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2014

  • Helland A (2009) Dealing with uncertainty and pursuing superior technology options in risk management-the inherency risk analysis. J Hazard Mater 164(2–3):995–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashagate Publishing, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • IEC (1995) Dependability management-risk analysis of technological systems (IEC 300-3-9). Int Electrotech Comm, IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2001) ILO-OSH. Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems. ILO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapp EA (2012) The influence of supervisor leadership practices and perceived group safety climate on worker safety performance. Saf Sci 50(4):1119–1124

    Google Scholar 

  • Knegtering B, Pasman HJ (2009) Safety of the process industries in the 21st century: a changing need of process safety management for a changing industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(6):162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Coze J-C (2013) Outlines of a sensitising model for industrial safety assessment. Saf Sci 51(1):187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveson NG (2000) Intent specifications: an approach to building human-centered specifications. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26(1):15–26. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/papers/intent-tse.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2014

  • Mearns K, Hope L, Ford MT, Tetrick LE (2010) Investment in workforce health: exploring the implications for workforce safety climate and commitment. Accid Anal Prev 42(5):1445–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohaghegh Z, Mosleh A (2009) Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment of complex socio-technical systems: principles and theoretical foundations. Saf Sci 47(8):1139–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostia WBL (2009) Got a risk reduction strategy? J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(6):778–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers PM (2013) Layer of protection analysis - quantifying human performance in initiating events and independent protection layers. J Loss Prev Process Ind 26(3):534–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart PM (2000) The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Saf Sci 34(1):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neathey F, Sinclair A, Rick J, Ballard J, Hunt W, Denvir A (2006) An evaluation of the five steps to risk assessment, research report 476. Health and Safety Executive, London. http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr476.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2014

  • Olsen E (2010) Exploring the possibility of a common structural model measuring associations between safety climate factors and safety behaviour in health care and the petroleum sectors. Accid Anal Prev 42(5):1507–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OHSAS-18002 (2000) Occupational health and safety management systems—guidelines for the implementation of OHSAS 18001. The Occupational Health & Safety Group, Macclesfield, Cheshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasman HJ, Jung S, Prem K, Rogers WJ, Yang X (2009) Is risk analysis a useful tool for improving process safety? J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(6):769–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne SC, Bergman ME, Beus JM, Rodríguez JM, Henning JB (2009) Safety climate: leading or lagging indicator of safety outcomes? J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(6):735–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne SC, Bergman ME, Rodríguez JM, Beus JM, Henning JB (2010) Leading and lagging: process safety climate—incident relationships at one year. J Loss Prev Process Ind 23(6):806–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci 27(2–3):183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reniers GLL, Ale BJM, Dullaert W, Soudank K (2009) Designing continuous safety improvement within chemical industrial areas. Saf Sci 47(5):578–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin GI (1999) Safe operation as a social construct. Ergonomics 42(11):1549–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schupp B, Hale A, Pasman H, Lemkovitz S, Goossens L (2006) Design support for the systematic integration of risk reduction into early chemical process. Saf Sci 44(1):37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöbel M, Manzey D (2011) Subjective theories of organizing and learning from events. Saf Sci 49(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1994) The fifth discipline: the art & practice of the learning organization, 2nd edn. Bantam Doubleday/Currency Publishing Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt MBA, van Bree L (2011) Uncertainty, precaution and risk governance. J Risk Res 14(4):401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt MBA, Renn O (2011) Risk governance. J Risk Res 14(4):431–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Väyrynen S, Jounila H, Latva-Ranta J (2014) HSEQ assessment procedure for supplying industrial network: a tool for implementing sustainability and responsible work systems into SMES. In: Ahram T, Karwowsk W, Marek T (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics AHFE 2014, Kraków, Poland 19–23 July 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR (2014) Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Special issue: systems ergonomics/human factors. Appl Ergon 45(1):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu T-C, Chang S-H, Shu C-M, Chen C-T, Wang C-P (2011) Safety leadership and safety performance in petrochemical industries: the mediating role of safety climate. J Loss Prev Process Ind 24(6):716–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar D (1980) Safety climate in the industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol 65(1):96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar D (2008) Safety climate and beyond: a multi-level multi-climate framework. Saf Sci 46(3):376–387

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar D, Luria G (2005) A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. J Appl Psychol 90(4):616–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for help with the statistical analysis of the results to Maria L. Hirvonen from the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Occupational Safety and Health Department, Legal Unit, P.O. Box 33, FI-00023 Government,, Helsinki, Finland

    Toivo Niskanen

Authors
  1. Toivo Niskanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toivo Niskanen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Seppo Väyrynen

  2. Vantaa, Finland

    Kari Häkkinen

  3. Helsinki, Finland

    Toivo Niskanen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niskanen, T. (2015). Safe Use of Chemicals and Risk Prevention in the Finnish Chemical Industry’s Work Places. In: Väyrynen, S., Häkkinen, K., Niskanen, T. (eds) Integrated Occupational Safety and Health Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13180-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13180-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13179-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13180-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation