Skip to main content

Modelling Impact of Key Success Factors in Humanitarian Logistics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logistics Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Logistics ((LNLO))

  • 2374 Accesses

Abstract

Recently the authors have explored strategic, tactical and operative key success factors for the humanitarian supply chain. Moreover, they have developed and tested a holistic and applicable performance measurement system for the humanitarian supply chain. Based on these results the impact of key success factors on performance is investigated: An impact model of key success factors on key performance indicators is developed and formulated. The evaluation of the model will be based on sequential qualitative system analysis for a first testing and analytical insights. Findings reveal that performance measurement in humanitarian logistics and humanitarian supply chains is still an open area of research, especially compared to the commercial logistics and supply chain sector. Moreover, it highlights how to identify and measure success in humanitarian supply chains. The results help humanitarian logistics and humanitarian supply chain actors to conduct further research in this area and to develop key performance indicators and measurement frameworks that suit the humanitarian logistics sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abidi H, Klumpp M, De Leeuw S (2013) Measuring Success in Humanitarian Supply Chains. In: Schoenherr T (eds) Proceedings of the 24th annual production and operations management society conference. Denver, Colorado, 03–06 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Albers O, Broux A (1999) Zukunftswerkstatt und Szenariotechnik. Ein Methodenbuch für Schule und Hochschule, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Altay N, Green WG (2006) OR/MS research in disaster operations management. Eur J Oper Res 175(1):475–493

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon BM, Balcik B (2008) Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. Int J Pub Sect 21(1):4–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blecken AF, Hellingrath B, Dangelmaier W (2009) A humanitarian supply chain process reference model. Int J Serv Technol Manage 12(4):391–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SE, Nojima N (2001) Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective. Transport Res Part A Policy Pract 35(6):475–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw S (2010) Towards a reference mission map for performance measurement in humanitarian supply chains. In: IFIP international federation for information processing, pp 181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont A, Pearman G (2006) Heating up the planet: climate change and security. In: Lowy institute paper 12. The Lowy Institute, Double Bay

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschka H, Hammer R (1997) Die Szenario-Technik in der strategischen Unternehmensplanung. In: Hahn D, Taylor B (eds) Strategische Unternehmensplanung. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 464–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskurth J, Rotmans J (2005) The SCENE model: getting a grip on sustainable development in policy making. Environment, Development and Sustainability, pp 135–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Sapir D, Vos F, Below R, Ponserre S (2012) Annual disaster statistical review 2011: the numbers and trends, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT (2003) The successful management of a small logistics company. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 33(9):825–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D, Kühnert C (2003) Assessing interaction networks with applications to catastrophe dynamics and disaster management. Physica A 328(3/4):584–606

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras J, Jaller M, Wachtendorf T (2012) Comparative performance of alternative humanitarian logistics structures after the Port-au-Prince earthquake: ACEs, PIEs, and CANs. Transp Res Part A 46:1623–1640

    Google Scholar 

  • Komrska J, Kopczak L, Swaminathan JM (2013) When supply chains save lives, available at http://www.unicef.org/supply/files/SCMR1301_Unicef.pdf

  • Kovács G, Spens KM (2007) Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 37:99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang DJ, Binder CR, Scholz RW, Schleiss K, Staubli B (2006) Impact factors and regulatory mechanisms for material flow management: integrating stakeholder and scientific perspectives—the case of biowaste delivery. Resour Conserv Recycl 47:101–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YH, Batta R, Rogerson PA, Blatt A, Flanigan M (2009) Application of a humanitarian relief logistics model to an earthquake disaster. Transport Res Record J Transport Res Board, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D-K, Pettit S, Beresford A (2006) Critical success factors for emergency relief logistics. WHAMPOA Interdisc J 51:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina-Borja A, Pasupathy KS, Triantis K (2007) Large-scale data envelopment analysis (DEA) implementation: a strategic performance management approach. J Oper Res Soc 58(8):1084–1098

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J, Rosenhead J (2004) Problem structuring methods in action. Eur J Oper Res 152:530–554

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moe TL, Gehbauer F, Senitz S, Mueller M (2007) Balanced scorecard for natural disaster management. Disaster Prev Manage 16(5):785–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwenja D, Lewis A (2009) Exploring the impact of the board of directors on the performance of not-for-profit organizations. Bus Strat Ser 10(6):359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K (1995) Performance measurement systems design: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manage 15(4):80–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oloruntoba R (2005) A wave of destruction and the waves of relief: issues, challenges and strategies. Disaster Prev Manage 14(4):506–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oloruntoba R (2010) An analysis of the cyclone larry emergency relief chain: some key success factors. Int J Prod Econ 126:85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oloruntoba R, Gray R (2006) Humanitarian aid: an agile supply chain? Int J Supply Chain Manage 11(2):115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit S, Beresford A (2009) Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 39(6):450–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power DJ, Sohal AS, Rahman SU (2001) Critical success factors in agile supply chain management. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 31(4):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaque MA, Cheng CC (1998) Outsourcing of logistics functions: a literature survey. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 28(2/3):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reibnitz U (1991) Szenario-Technik: Instrumente für die unternehmerische und persönliche Erfolgsplanung. Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Rongier C, Galasso F, Lauras M, Gourc D (2010) A method to define a performance indicator system for the control of a crisis. In: 8th international conference of modeling and simulation, Hammamet

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli G, Abidi H, Regattieri A, Klumpp M (2013) A performance measurement system for the evaluation of humanitarian supply chain. In: Schoenherr T (eds) Proceedings of the 24th annual production and operations management society conference, Denver, 03–06 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz R, Tietje O (2002) Embedded case study methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. SAGE, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz SF, Heigh I (2009) Logistics performance management in action within a humanitarian organization. Manage Res News 32(1):1038–1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas A, Kopczak LR (2007) Life-saving supply chain–challenges and the path forward. In: Lee HL, Lee CY (eds) Building supply chain excellence in emerging economies. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, pp 93–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasini R, Van Wassenhove LN (2009) From preparedness to partnerships: case study research on humanitarian logistics. Int Trans Oper Res 16:549–559

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2006) Strengthening of the coordination of emergency humanitarian assistance of the United Nations. United Nations. Available at http://www.un.org/docs/ecosoc/documents/2006/reports/ECOSOC%202006%20-%20Humanitarian%20Coordination.pdf

  • Van Der Laan EA, De Brito MP, Vergunst DA (2009) Performance measurement in humanitarian supply chains. Int J Risk Assess Manag 13(1):22–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wassenhove LN (2006) Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. J Oper Res Soc 57(5):475–484

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Lang D, Siegrist M (2008) Qualitative system analysis as a means for sustainable governance of emerging technologies: the case of nanotechnology. J Clean Prod 16(8–9):988–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is connected to the national excellence research cluster LogistikRuhr (www.effizienzcluster.de), funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the project funding line 01|C10L19D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hella Abidi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix I

Appendix I

Category

KPIs

Description

Equation

Type

Qualitative

Quantitative

Financial

No-Financial

Response time

Duration of the project

The indicator measures the duration of the project

Number of months

  

Ù§

Average response time

The indicator measures the average response time between the occurrence of the disaster and arrival time of the organisation’s first supplies (personnel and goods)

Average number of days (personnel)

  

Ù§

Average number of days (goods)

Delivery date reliability

The indicator measures the accuracy of delivery date of goods to the disaster area both in the first aid and at steady-state

First aid (<3 months)

\(\frac{\text{Number of deliveries on time}}{\text{Total number of deliveries}}\)

  

Ù§

Steady-state (>3months)

\(\frac{\text{Number of deliveries on time}}{\text{Total number of deliveries}}\)

Goods-to-delivery time

The indicator measures the time between when goods are purchased and when they arrive at the disaster site

Average number of days to purchase goods

  

Ù§

Average number of days to transport goods from the organisation’s warehouse to the disaster area

Average number of days to deliver goods to the staging area

Presence of organisation’s warehouse in loco

The indicator expresses the presence of a warehouse with prepositioned materials in a radius of 200 km around the disaster area

Yes/no

  

Ù§

Reliability/Flexibility

Volume flexibility

The indicator measures the organisation’s ability to respond to different magnitudes of disasters

[1–5] (1 very low; 5 very high)

Ù§

  

Mix flexibility

The indicator measures the organisation’s ability to change the variety of goods sent to the disaster area

[1–5] (1 very low; 5 very high)

Ù§

  

Percentage of prepositioned goods

The indicator measures the percentage of goods (drugs and no-drugs) prepositioned in organisation’s warehouses, both at regional and international level

Drugs

\(\frac{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{prepositioned}}} \\ {{\text{goods}}\;{\text{at}}\;{\text{regional}}\;{\text{level}}} \\ \end{array} }}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{goods}}}}\)

  

Ù§

\(\frac{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{prepositioned}}} \\ {{\text{goods}}\;{\text{at}}\;{\text{international}}\;{\text{level}}} \\ \end{array} }}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{goods}}}}\)

\(\frac{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{no}} - } \\ {{\text{prepositioned}}\;{\text{goods}}} \\ \end{array} }}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{goods}}}}\)

No- Drugs

\(\frac{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{prepositioned}}} \\ {{\text{goods}}\;{\text{at}}\;{\text{regional}}\;{\text{level}}} \\ \end{array} }}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{goods}}}}\)

\(\frac{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{prepositioned}}} \\ {{\text{goods}}\;{\text{at}}\;{\text{international}}\;{\text{level}}} \\ \end{array} }}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{goods}}}}\)

\(\frac{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{no}} - } \\ {{\text{prepositioned}}\;{\text{goods}}} \\ \end{array} }}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{goods}}}}\)

Cooperation/Standardisation

Degree of information sharing

The indicator measures the degree of information sharing between actors of the organisation, involved in the disaster

[1–5] (1 very low; 5 very high)

Ù§

  

Degree of cooperation

The indicator measures the degree of cooperation between actors of the organisation, involved in the disaster

[1–5] (1 very low; 5 very high)

Ù§

  

Degree of standardisation

The indicator measures the degree of standardisation of procedures

[1–5] (1 very low; 5 very high)

Ù§

  

Beneficiaries and donors satisfaction

Number of relief workers

The indicator measures the number of relief workers (national and international staff) employed during the resolution of the disaster

Number of relief workers at national level

  

Ù§

Number of relief workers at international level

Percentage of people engaged on dispensing aid

The indicator measures the percentage of people engaged on dispensing aid (doctors and health personnel, logisticians, etc.)

\(\frac{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{workers}}\;{\text{engaged }}} \\ {{\text{on}}\;{\text{dispensing}}\;{\text{aid}}} \\ \end{array} }}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{workers}}}}\)

  

Ù§

Total dollars spent

The indicator measures the organisation in financial terms

Dollars given by institutional donors

 

Ù§

 

Dollars given by private donors

Number of people helped

The indicator measures the efficiency of the organisation in terms of people helped (direct and indirect beneficiaries)

Number of people helped

  

Ù§

Donor’s auditing

The indicator expresses if donors monitor the work of the employees

Yes/no

  

Ù§

Spending capacity

The indicator measures the ability of the organisation to respect the account of money requested to institutional donors

\(\frac{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Dollars}}\;{\text{spent}}\;{\text{given}}\;{\text{by }}} \\ {{\text{institutional}}\;{\text{donors}}} \\ \end{array} }}{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Total}}\;{\text{dollars}}\;{\text{requested}}\;{\text{to }}} \\ {{\text{institutional}}\;{\text{donors}}} \\ \end{array} }}\)

 

Ù§

 

Satisfaction level

The indicator measures the satisfaction level of donors

[1–5] (1 very low; 5 very high)

Ù§

  

Cost performance

Cost of goods

The indicator measures the percentage of the cost of goods on the cost of the project

\(\frac{{{\text{Cost}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{goods}}}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{dollars}}\;{\text{spent}}}}\)

 

Ù§

 

Transportation cost

The indicator measures the incidence of the transportation cost (by air, sea and truck) during the whole period in which the organisation stays in the disaster area

\(\frac{{{\text{Transportation}}\;{\text{cost}}}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{dollars}}\;{\text{spent}}}}\)

 

Ù§

 

Warehousing cost

The indicator measures the percentage of the warehousing cost to store goods in the surroundings of the disaster area on the cost of the project

\(\frac{{{\text{Warehousing}}\;{\text{cost}}}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{dollars}}\;{\text{spent}}}}\)

 

Ù§

 

Percentage of claims

The indicator measures the percentage of claims

\(\frac{{{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{orders}}\;{\text{claimed}}/{\text{year}}}}{{{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{orders}}/{\text{year}}}}\)

  

Ù§

Percentage of goods not distributed

The indicator measures the percentage of goods (drugs and no-drugs) not distributed

\(\frac{{{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{drugs}}\;{\text{not}}\;{\text{distributed}}}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{goods}}}}\)

  

Ù§

\(\frac{{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{no}} - {\text{drug}}\;{\text{goods }}} \\ {{\text{not}}\;{\text{distributed}}} \\ \end{array} }}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{goods}}}}\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abidi, H., Klumpp, M., de Leeuw, S. (2015). Modelling Impact of Key Success Factors in Humanitarian Logistics. In: Dethloff, J., Haasis, HD., Kopfer, H., Kotzab, H., Schönberger, J. (eds) Logistics Management. Lecture Notes in Logistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13177-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13177-1_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13176-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13177-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics