Skip to main content

Adaptive Tag Selection for Image Annotation

  • Conference paper
Advances in Multimedia Information Processing – PCM 2014 (PCM 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8879))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Not all tags are relevant to an image, and the number of relevant tags is image-dependent. Although many methods have been proposed for image auto-annotation, the question of how to determine the number of tags to be selected per image remains open. The main challenge is that for a large tag vocabulary, there is often a lack of ground truth data for acquiring optimal cutoff thresholds per tag. In contrast to previous works that pre-specify the number of tags to be selected, we propose in this paper adaptive tag selection. The key insight is to divide the vocabulary into two disjoint subsets, namely a seen set consisting of tags having ground truth available for optimizing their thresholds and a novel set consisting of tags without any ground truth. Such a division allows us to estimate how many tags shall be selected from the novel set according to the tags that have been selected from the seen set. The effectiveness of the proposed method is justified by our participation in the ImageCLEF 2014 image annotation task. On a set of 2,065 test images with ground truth available for 207 tags, the benchmark evaluation shows that compared to the popular top-k strategy which obtains an F-score of 0.122, adaptive tag selection achieves a higher F-score of 0.223. Moreover, by treating the underlying image annotation system as a black box, the new method can be used as an easy plug-in to boost the performance of existing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van de Sande, K., Snoek, C.: The University of Amsterdam’s concept detection system at imageclef 2011. In: CLEF (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li, X., Snoek, C.: Classifying tag relevance with relevant positive and negative examples. In: ACM MM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, X.J., Zhang, L., Ma, W.Y.: Duplicate-search-based image annotation using web-scale data. Proceedings of the IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ballan, L., Uricchio, T., Seidenari, L., Del Bimbo, A.: A cross-media model for automatic image annotation. In: ICMR (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Villegas, M., Paredes, R.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2014 scalable concept image annotation task. In: CLEF (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, X., Snoek, C., Worring, M.: Learning social tag relevance by neighbor voting. TMM 11(7), 1310–1322 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tang, J., Hong, R., Yan, S., Chua, T.S.: Image annotation by knn-sparse graph-based label propagation over noisily-tagged web images. In: TIST (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, S., Jiang, Y.G., Ngo, C.W.: Sampling and ontologically pooling web images for visual concept learning. TMM 14(4), 1068–1078 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borgne, H.L., Popescu, A., Znaidia, A.: CEA LIST@imageclef 2013: Scalable concept image annotation. In: CLEF Working Notes (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, Y.G., Ngo, C.W., Chang, S.F.: Semantic context transfer across heterogeneous sources for domain adaptive video search. In: ACMMM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cilibrasi, R., Vitanyi, P.: The Google similarity distance. TKDE 19(3), 370–383 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van de Sande, K., Gevers, T., Snoek, C.: Evaluating color descriptors for object and scene recognition. TPAMI 32, 1582–1596 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Villegas, M., Paredes, R., Thomee, B.: Overview of the imageclef 2013 scalable concept image annotation subtask. In: CLEF (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hua, X.S., Yang, L., Wang, J., Wang, J., Ye, M., Wang, K., Rui, Y., Li, J.: Clickage: Towards bridging semantic and intent gaps via mining click logs of search engines. In: ACMMM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, X., Snoek, C., Worring, M., Koelma, D., Smeulders, A.: Bootstrapping visual categorization with relevant negatives. TMM 15(4), 933–945 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maji, S., Berg, A., Malik, J.: Classification using intersection kernel support vector machines is efficient. In: CVPR (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, X., Liao, S., Liu, B., Yang, G., Jin, Q., Xu, J., Du, X.: Renmin University of China at ImageCLEF 2013 scalable concept image annotation. In: CLEF Working Notes (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

He, X., Li, X., Yang, G., Xu, J., Jin, Q. (2014). Adaptive Tag Selection for Image Annotation. In: Ooi, W.T., Snoek, C.G.M., Tan, H.K., Ho, CK., Huet, B., Ngo, CW. (eds) Advances in Multimedia Information Processing – PCM 2014. PCM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8879. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13168-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13168-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13167-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13168-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics