Skip to main content

Economics, Intuition and Budgets: The Theory of Constraints Alternative

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 1994 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

Not since the Italian scientist-monk, Luca Pacioli, codified the double-entry accounting system based on Arabic algebra in the 15th century has there been as potentially significant a contribution to the economic literature by a non-business scholar as is represented in the fledgling Theory of Constraints. Born in the brain of an Israeli physicist, Eilyahu M. Goldratt, this new theory poses a significant challenge to the domination of cost accounting methods in the management of business enterprises. This article describes in non-technical terms the major philosophical differences between current economic cost accounting methods and this relatively undeveloped new theory of the firm. Its primary purpose is to motivate an interest in the Theory of Constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldrich, Howard E. (1979), Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson,B.F. (1980), The Complete Thinker. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ando, A. and F. Modigliani (1965) “Velocity and the Investment Multiplier,” American Economic Review, pp. 693-728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boole, G.(1955) “The Laws of Thought,” in Treasury of Philosophy, ed. D. Runes, New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigoness, W. and W.O. Perrault (1982), “A Conceptual Paradigm and Approach for the Study of Innovators,” Academy of Management Journal, 24, 68-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Errett (1967), The Foundations of Constructive Mathematics. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1981), On the Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, Allan (1979), “Constructive Mathematics,” Scientific American, 146-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedekind, Richard (1955), “The Nature and Meaning of Numbers,” in Treasury of Philosophy, ed. D. Runes, New York: Crown Publishers, 306-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, George W. and Lawrence B. Mohr (1976), “Conceptual Issues in the Study of Innovations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 700-714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. and D. Meislelman (1963), “The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and the Investment Multiplier in the United States, 1897-1958” in Commission on Money and Credit, Stabilisation Policies, Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, Jay (1973), Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984), The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. Croton-on-Hudson, NY:North River Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1988a), “Apologia,” The Theory of Constraints Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, April/May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1988b), “Laying the Foundation,” The Theory of Constraints Journal, Vol. 1, No.2, April/May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1989), Chapter 5: How Complex Are Our Systems? The Theory of Constraints Journal, 1, July/ August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990), Theory of Constraints. New York: North River Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, Jerald and Michael Aiken (1970), Social Change in Complex Organizations. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D.F. (1980), “Predictive Failure and Econometric Modelling in Macroeconomics: The Transactions Demand for Money,” in Omerod, P.A. (ed.), Economic Modelling, London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, William J. (1987), Business Without Economists. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. (1991 ), Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science. Cincinnati: SouthWestern Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. R. and M. J. Evanisko (1981 ), “Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations,” Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay Lorsch (1967), Organization and Environment. Boston: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin (1968), The Economics of Technological Change. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Philip B. (1981), Corporations in Crisis, Behavioral Observations for Bankruptcy Policy. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, Barry M., Lance E. Sandelands and Jane E. Dutton (1981), “Threat-Rigidity Effects in rganizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Thomas A. (1990), “Why Budgets Are Bad For Business,” Fortune, June, 115-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. A. (1969), Bureaucracy and Innovation. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. A. (1961), Modern Organization. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Merenski, P. (2015). Economics, Intuition and Budgets: The Theory of Constraints Alternative. In: Wilson, E., Black, W. (eds) Proceedings of the 1994 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13162-7_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics