Skip to main content

Deadbeat Control for Multivariable Discrete Time Systems with Time Varying Delays

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Chaos Modeling and Control Systems Design

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 581))

Abstract

In this chapter a novel approach for the deadbeat control of multivariable discrete time systems is proposed. Deadbeat control is a well known technique that has been implemented during the last decades in SISO and MIMO discrete time systems due to the ripple free characteristics and the designer selection of the output response. Deadbeat control consist in establishing the minimum number of steps in which the desired output response must be reached, this objective is achieved by placing the appropriate number of closed loop poles at the origin and cancelling the transmission zeros of the system. On the other side, constant time delays in the state or the input of the system is a phenomena found in many continuous and discrete time systems, produced by delays in the communication channels or other kind of sources, yielding unwanted effects on the systems like performance deterioration, or instability on the system. Even when the analysis and design of appropriate controllers with constant time delays in the state or the input has been studied by several researchers applying several control techniques such as state and output feedback, in this chapter the development of a deadbeat control for discrete time systems with constant delays is explained as a preamble of the main topic of this chapter related to the deadbeat control of discrete time systems with time varying delays. This first approach is derived by implementing a state feedback controller, and in opposition of the implementation of traditional techniques such as optimal control where a stable gain is obtained by solving the required Riccati equations, the deadbeat controller is obtained by selecting the appropriate gain matrix solving the necessary LMI’s placing the required number of poles at the origin and eliminating the finite transmission zeros of the system in order to obtain the required deadbeat characteristics in which the desired system response is reached in minimun time steps. After this overview, deadbeat controllers are designed considering the time varying delays, following a similar approach such as the constant time delay counterpart. In order to obtain an appropriate deadbeat controller, a state feedback controller gain is obtained by solving the required LMI’s, placing the required poles in order to obtain the desired response cancelling the finite transmission zeros. The theoretical background is tested by several illustrative examples and finally the discussion and conclusions of this work are shown in the end of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. de Souza, C.E., Coutinho, D.: Robust stability and control of uncertain linear discrete-time periodic systems with time-delay. Automatica 50(2), 431–441 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Debeljkovic, D., Dimitrijevic, N., Popov, D., Stojanovic, S.: On Non-Lyapunov stability of linear discrete time delay systems: LMIs approach. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, IEEE, Beijing, China, 6–8, July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eldem, V., Selbuz, H.: On the general solution of the state deadbeat control problem. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 39(5), 1002–1006 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Emami-Naeini, A.: Deadbeat control of linear multivariable generalized state-space systems. In: Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Decision and Control Honolulu, IEEE, Hawaii, (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Emami-Naeini, A.: Deadbeat control of linear multivariable generalized state-space systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 37(5), 648–652 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Genesio, R., Tesi, A.: The output stabilization of SISO bilinear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 33(10), 950–952 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Halpern, M.E., Evans, R.J., Hill, R.D.: Optimal pole placement design for SISO discrete-time systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 41(9), 1322–1326 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. He, Y., Wu, M., Liu, G.-P., She, J.-H.: Output feedback stabilization for a discrete-time system with a time-varying delay. IEEE Tras. Autom. Control 53(10), 2372–2377 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Jordan, D., Korn, J.: Deadbeat algorithms for multivariable process control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 25(3), 486–491 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaczorek, T.: Deadbeat control of linear discrete-time systems by periodic output-feedback. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 31(12), 1153–1156 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Katoh, H., Funahashi, Y.: Continuous-time deadbeat control for sampled-data systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 41(10), 1478–1481 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Leite, V. J. S. and Miranda, M. F., 2008. Stabilization of discrete time-varying delay systems: a convex parameter dependent approach. In: 2008 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, IEEE, Seattle, Washington, USA, 11–13, June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leite, V.J. S., Tarbouriech, S., Peres, P.L. D.: A convex approach for robust state feedback control of discrete-time systems with state delay. In: Proceeding of the 2004 American Control Conference Boston, IEEE, Massachusetts, 30 June, 2 July, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis, F.L.: A general riccati equation solution to the deadbeat control problem. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 27(1), 186–188 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Man, S., Zhenpu, G., Peng, L.: Delay-dependent robust H infinity control for discrete systems with time-delay and polytopic uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control Conference, IEEE, Beijing, China, 29–31 July, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marrari, M.R., Emani-Naeini, A., Franklin, G.F.: Output deadbeat control of discrete-time multivariable systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 34(6), 644–648 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Miranda, M.F., Leite, V.J.S., Caldeira, A.F.: Robust stabilization of polytopic discrete-time systems with time-varying delay in the states. In: 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA, 15–17 Dec, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  18. Olgac, N., Sipahi, R.: An exact method for the stability analysis of time-delayed linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 47(5), 793–797 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Sirisena, H.R.: Ripple-free deadbeat control of SISO discrete systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 30(2), 168–170 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Spurgeon, S.K., Pugh, A.C.: On output deadbeat control of discrete-time multivariable systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 36(7), 894–896 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Urikura, S., Nagata, A.: Ripple-free deadbeat control for sampled-data systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 32(6), 474–482 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Y., Yan, X., Zuo, Z., Zhao, H.: Robust stability and stabilization of discrete time-delay system with time-varying delay and non-linear perturbations. In: 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control Part of 2008 IEEE Multi-conference on Systems and Control, IEEE, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 3–5 Sept, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xiaofu, J., Jinfeng, G.: Delay-dependent robust H infinity control for uncertain discrete singular linear time-delay systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control Conference, IEEE, Yantai, China, 22–24 July, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yoneyama, J.: Robust stability and stabilization for uncertain discrete-time fuzzy systems with time-varying delay. In: Proceedings of the 7th Asian Control Conference, IEEE, Hong Kong, China, 27–29 Aug, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu, M., Wang, L., Chu, T.: Robust stabilization of discrete-time systems with time-varying delays. In: 2005 American Control Conference, IEEE, Portland, OR, USA, 8–10 June, 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Taher Azar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Azar, A.T., Serrano, F.E. (2015). Deadbeat Control for Multivariable Discrete Time Systems with Time Varying Delays. In: Azar, A., Vaidyanathan, S. (eds) Chaos Modeling and Control Systems Design. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 581. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13132-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13132-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13131-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13132-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics