Skip to main content

Demand Point Aggregation for Some Basic Location Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Location Science

Abstract

Location problems occurring in urban or regional settings may involve many tens of thousands of “demand points,” usually individual residences. In modeling such problems it is common to aggregate demand points to obtain tractable models. We discuss aggregation approaches to a large class of location models, consider various aggregation error measures, and identify some effective measures. In particular, we focus on an upper bounding methodology for the error associated with aggregation. The chapter includes an example application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal PK, Varadarajan KR (1999) Approximation algorithms for bipartite and nonbipartite matchings in the plane. In: 10th ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (SODA), pp 805–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal PK, Efrat A, Sharir M (1999) Vertical decomposition of shallow levels in 3-dimensional arrangements and its applications. SIAM J Comput 29:912–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja RK, Magnanti TL, Orlin JB (1993) Network flows: theory, algorithms, and applications, exercise 12.23. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 505

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender T, Hennes H, Kalcsics J, Melo T, Nickel S (2001) Location software and interface with GIS and supply chain management. In: Drezner Z, Hamacher H (eds) Facility location: applications and theory. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Casillas PA (1987) Data aggregation and the p-median problem in continuous space. In: Ghosh A, Rushton G (eds) Spatial analysis and location-allocation models. Van Nostrand Reinhold Publishers, New York, pp 227–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelst KR, Schultz JP, Sanghvi N (1988) Issues and decision aids for designing branch networks. J Retail Bank 10:5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskin MS (2013) Network and discrete location: models, algorithms, and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daskin MS, Haghani AE, Khanal M, Malandraki C (1989) Aggregation effects in maximum covering models. Ann Oper Res 18:115–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekle J, Lavieri M, Martin E, Emir-Farinas H, Francis RL (2005) A Florida county locates disaster recovery centers. Interfaces 35:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domich PD, Hoffman KL, Jackson RHF, McClain MA (1991) Locating tax facilities: a graphics-based microcomputer optimization model. Manag Sci 37:960–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z (ed) (1995) Facility location: a survey of applications and methods. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Hamacher HW (eds) (2002) Facility location: theory and algorithms. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer M, Frieze A (1985) A simple heuristic for the p-center problem. Oper Res Lett 3:285–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efrat A, Itai A, Katz MJ (2001) Geometry helps in bottleneck matching and related problems. Algorithmica 31:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Bozkaya B (1999) Analysis of aggregation errors for the p-median problem. Comput Oper Res 26:1075–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Neuman S (1989) Analytical models for locating undesirable facilities. Eur J Oper Res 40:275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst A, Hamacher HW, Jiang HW, Krishnamorthy M, Woeginger G (2002a) Uncapacitated single and multiple allocation p-hub center problems. Report CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst A, Hamacher HW, Jiang HW, Krishnamorthy M, Woeginger G (2002b) Heuristic algorithms for the uncapacitated hub center single allocation problem. Report CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, Lowe TJ (1992) On worst-case aggregation analysis for network location problems. Ann Oper Res 40:229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, White JA (1974) Facility layout and location: an analytical approach, problem 7.25. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 324

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, McGinnis LF, White JA (1992) Facility layout and location: an analytical approach, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, Lowe TJ, Rushton G, Rayco MB (1999) A synthesis of aggregation methods for multi-facility location problems: strategies for containing error. Geogr Anal 31:67–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, Lowe TJ, Tamir A (2000) On aggregation error bounds for a class of location models. Oper Res 48:294–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, Lowe TJ, Rayco MB, Tamir A (2003) Exploiting self-canceling demand point aggregation error for some planar rectilinear median problems. Nav Res Logist 50:614–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, Lowe TJ, Tamir A (2004a) Demand point aggregation analysis for a class of constrained location models: a penalty function approach. IIE Trans 36:601–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, Lowe TJ, Tamir A, Emir-Farinas H (2004b) Aggregation decomposition and aggregation guidelines for a class of minimax and covering location models. Geogr Anal 36:332–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, Lowe TJ, Tamir A, Emir-Farinas H (2004c) A framework for demand point and solution space aggregation analysis for location models. Eur J Oper Res 159:574–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, Rayco MB, Lowe TJ, Tamir A (2009) Aggregation error for location models: survey and analysis. Ann Oper Res 167:171–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavriliouk EO (2003) Aggregation in hub location models. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Mathematics, Clemson University, Clemson

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion A (1977) Objective function approximations in mathematical programming. Math Prog 13:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg R (1976) Methods of real analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi SL (1965) Optimum location of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Oper Res 12:450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handler GY, Mirchandani PB (1979) Location on networks: theory and algorithms. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillsman EL, Rhoda R (1978) Errors in measuring distances from populations to service centers. Ann Reg Sci 12:74–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker JN, Garfinkel RS, Chen CK (1991) Finite dominating sets for network location problems. Oper Res 39:100–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kariv O, Hakimi SL (1979) An algorithmic approach to network location problems: part 1, the p-centers; part 2, the p-medians. SIAM J Appl Math 37:513–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolen A, Tamir A (1990) Covering problems. In: Mirchandani PB, Francis RL (eds) Discrete location theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 263–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Love R, Morris J, Wesolowsky G (1988) Facility location: models and methods. North-Holland Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Megiddo N, Supowit KJ (1984) On the complexity of some common geometric location problems. SIAM J Comput 13:182–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani PB, Francis RL (eds) (1990) Discrete location theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray AT, Gottsegen JM (1997) The influence of data aggregation on the stability of p-median location model solutions. Geogr Anal 29:200–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel S, Puerto J (2005) Location theory: a unified approach. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardalos PM, Resende M (eds) (2002) Handbook of applied optimization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Plastria F (2000) New error bounds in continuous minisum location for aggregation at the gravity centre. Stud Locat Anal 14:101–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Plastria F (2001) On the choice of aggregation points for continuous p-median problems: a case for the gravity center. TOP 9:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves C (1993) Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems. Blackwell Scientific Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Resende MGC, de Sousa JP (eds) (2004) Metaheuristics: computer decision-making. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi Y (1985) Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming models. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan KR (1998) A divide and conquer algorithm for min-cost perfect matching in the plane. In: Proceedings 38th annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer sciences, pp 320−331

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. Francis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Francis, R.L., Lowe, T.J. (2015). Demand Point Aggregation for Some Basic Location Models. In: Laporte, G., Nickel, S., Saldanha da Gama, F. (eds) Location Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13111-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics