Skip to main content

On the Computational Complexity of Vertex Integrity and Component Order Connectivity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8889))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Weighted Vertex Integrity (wVI) problem takes as input an \(n\)-vertex graph \(G\), a weight function \(w:V(G)\rightarrow \mathbb {N}\), and an integer \(p\). The task is to decide if there exists a set \(X\subseteq V(G)\) such that the weight of \(X\) plus the weight of a heaviest component of \(G-X\) is at most \(p\). Among other results, we prove that:

  1. (1)

    wVI is NP-complete on co-comparability graphs, even if each vertex has weight \(1\);

  2. (2)

    wVI can be solved in \(O(p^{p+1}n)\) time;

  3. (3)

    wVI admits a kernel with at most \(p^3\) vertices.

Result (1) refutes a conjecture by Ray and Deogun (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 16: 65–73, 1994) and answers an open question by Ray et al. (Ars Comb. 79: 77–95, 2006). It also complements a result by Kratsch et al. (Discr. Appl. Math. 77: 259–270, 1997), stating that the unweighted version of the problem can be solved in polynomial time on co-comparability graphs of bounded dimension, provided that an intersection model of the input graph is given as part of the input.

An instance of the Weighted Component Order Connectivity (wCOC) problem consists of an \(n\)-vertex graph \(G\), a weight function \(w:V(G)\rightarrow \mathbb {N}\), and two integers \(k\) and \(\ell \), and the task is to decide if there exists a set \(X\subseteq V(G)\) such that the weight of \(X\) is at most \(k\) and the weight of a heaviest component of \(G-X\) is at most \(\ell \). In some sense, the wCOC problem can be seen as a refined version of the wVI problem. We obtain several classical and parameterized complexity results on the wCOC problem, uncovering interesting similarities and differences between wCOC and wVI. We prove, among other results, that:

  1. (4)

    wCOC can be solved in \(O(\min \{k,\ell \}\cdot n^3)\) time on interval graphs, while the unweighted version can be solved in \(O(n^2)\) time on this graph class;

  2. (5)

    wCOC is W[1]-hard on split graphs when parameterized by \(k\) or by \(\ell \);

  3. (6)

    wCOC can be solved in \(2^{O(k\log \ell )} n\) time;

  4. (7)

    wCOC admits a kernel with at most \(k\ell (k+\ell )+k\) vertices.

We also show that result (6) is essentially tight by proving that wCOC cannot be solved in \(2^{o(k \log \ell )}n^{O(1)}\) time, even when restricted to split graphs, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails.

The research leading to these results has received funding from the Research Council of Norway, Bergen Research Foundation under the project Beating Hardness by Preprocessing and the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement n. 267959.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagga, K.S., Beineke, L.W., Goddard, W., Lipman, M.J., Pippert, R.E.: A survey of integrity. Discr. Appl. Math. 37, 13–28 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Barefoot, C.A., Entringer, R., Swart, H.: Vulnerability in graphs–a comparative survey. J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 1(38), 13–22 (1987)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Ameur, W., Mohamed-Sidi, M.-A., Neto, J.: The k-separator problem. In: Du, D.-Z., Zhang, G. (eds.) COCOON 2013. LNCS, vol. 7936, pp. 337–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodlaender, H.L., Fomin, F.V.: Equitable colorings of bounded treewidth graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 349(1), 22–30 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Booth, K.S., Lueker, G.S.: Testing for the consecutive ones property, interval graphs, and graph planarity using PQ-tree algorithms. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 13(3), 335–379 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, L.H., Entringer, R.C., Fellows, M.R.: Computational complexity of integrity. J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 2, 179–191 (1987)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Drange, P.G., Dregi, M.S., van ’t Hof, P.: On the Computational Complexity of Vertex Integrity. CoRR, abs/1403.6331 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fellows, M., Stueckle, S.: The immersion order, forbidden subgraphs and the complexity of network integrity. J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 6, 23–32 (1989)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability. W. H. Freeman, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gross, D., Heinig, M., Iswara, L., Kazmierczak, L.W., Luttrell, K., Saccoman, J.T., Suffel, C.: A survey of component order connectivity models of graph theoretic networks. WSEAS Trans. Math. 12, 895–910 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ho, C.W., Lee, R.C.T.: Counting clique trees and computing perfect elimination schemes in parallel. Inf. Process. Lett. 31(2), 61–68 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kratsch, D., Kloks, T., Müller, H.: Measuring the vulnerability for classes of intersection graphs. Discr. Appl. Math. 77(3), 259–270 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, Q.: Vulnerability parameters of split graphs. Int. J. Comput. Math. 85(1), 19–23 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ray, S., Deogun, J.S.: Computational complexity of weighted integrity. J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 16, 65–73 (1994)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ray, S., Kannan, R., Zhang, D., Jiang, H.: The weighted integrity problem is polynomial for interval graphs. Ars Comb. 79, 77–95 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Woeginger, G.J.: The toughness of split graphs. Discr. Math. 190(1–3), 295–297 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pål Grønås Drange .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Drange, P.G., Dregi, M.S., van ’t Hof, P. (2014). On the Computational Complexity of Vertex Integrity and Component Order Connectivity. In: Ahn, HK., Shin, CS. (eds) Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8889. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13075-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13075-0_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13074-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13075-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics