Advertisement

Seismic Behavior of Glass Curtain Walls

  • Roham Afghani KhoraskaniEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

As mentioned earlier, the basic cause of damage to the nonstructural elements of the building during an earthquake is deflections and displacements within the structural elements. In this chapter the behavior of the glass panels subjected to these displacements are investigated for different types of architectural glazing systems. For every system depending on the fixtures and their boundary conditions, the maximum allowable lateral force that may be exerted on the panel is derived using the theory of plates for the three cases of dry glazed systems, structural sealant systems and point fixed systems. Simplification has been made in order to achieve analytical solutions.

Keywords

Curtain Wall System Glass Panels Glass Panes Single-layer Glass Structural Glazing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aiello, S., Campione, G., Minafò, G., & Scibilia, N. (2011). Compressive behaviour of laminated structural glass members. Engineering Structures, 33(12), 3402–3408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedon, C., & Amadio, C. (2012). Buckling of flat laminated glass panels under in-plane compression or shear. Engineering Structures, 36, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behr, R. A. (2006). Design of architectural glazing to resist earthquakes. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 12(3), 122–128.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford, M. A., & Azhari, M. (1995). Buckling of plates with different end conditions using the finite strip method. Computers & Structures, 56(1), 75–83.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. British Standards Institution (1996). Eurocode 8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. Pt. 1.1, General rules: Seismic actions and general requirements for structures. London: British Standards Institution.Google Scholar
  6. Building Research Association (1989). The behavior of external glazing systems under seismic in-plane racking. Building Research Association of New Zealand.Google Scholar
  7. Carré, H., & Daudeville, L. (1999). Load-bearing capacity of tempered structural glass. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 125(8), 914–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chopra, A. K. (2001). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, London: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
  9. European Standards. (2009). prEN 13474-3. Brussels: European Standards.Google Scholar
  10. Glass Processing Days (2005). In Proceedings of International Conference on Architectural and Automotive Glass Tamglass, Tampere, Finland. June 17–20 2005.Google Scholar
  11. Hayman, B., Berggreen, C., Lundsgaard-Larsen, C., Delarche, A., Toftegaard, H., Dow, R. S., et al. (2011). Studies of the buckling of composite plates in compression. Ships and Offshore Structures, 6(1–2), 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heng, H. (2004). Design of structural glass fitting for seismic condition. Australia: Toowoomba.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, S., Yoon, S.J., & Back, S.Y. (2006). Buckling of composite thin-walled members. Key Engineering Materials, 326, 1733–1736.Google Scholar
  14. Luible, A., & Crisinel, M. (2004). Buckling strength of glass elements in compression. Structural Engineering International: Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), 14(2), 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O’Brien, W. C. (2009). Development of a closed-form equation and fragility curves for performance-based seismic design of glass curtain wall and storefront systems. Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  16. Schlaich, J., Schober, H., & Moschner, T. (2005). Prestressed cable-net facades. Structural Engineering International: Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), 15(1), 36–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shi, G., Zuo, Y., Shi, X., Shi, Y., Wang, Y., & Guo, Z. (2010). Influence of damages on static behavior of single-layer cable net supported glass curtain wall: Full-scale model test. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 4(3), 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sucuoǧlu, H., & Vallabhan, C. V. G. (1997). Behaviour of window glass panels during earthquakes. Engineering Structures, 19(8), 685–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Timoshenko, S. (1961). Theory of elastic stability (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Young, W. C. (2002). Roark’s formulas for stress and strain (7th ed.). New York, London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Zarghamee, M. S., Schwartz, T. A., & Gladstone, M. (1996). Seismic behavior of structural silicone glazing. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1286, 46–59.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico Di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations