Skip to main content

Seismic Sound Lab: Sights, Sounds and Perception of the Earth as an Acoustic Space

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8905))

Abstract

We construct a representation of earthquakes and global seismic waves through sound and animated images. The seismic wave field is the ensemble of elastic waves that propagate through the planet after an earthquake, emanating from the rupture on the fault. The sounds are made by time compression (i.e. speeding up) of seismic data with minimal additional processing. The animated images are renderings of numerical simulations of seismic wave propagation in the globe. Synchronized sounds and images reveal complex patterns and illustrate numerous aspects of the seismic wave field. These movies represent phenomena occurring far from the time and length scales normally accessible to us, creating a profound experience for the observer. The multi-sensory perception of these complex phenomena may also bring new insights to researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.jtbullitt.com/earthsound.

  2. 2.

    http://www.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/furumura/lp/lp.html.

  3. 3.

    www.iris.edu.

  4. 4.

    http://www.seis.sc.edu/sod/.

  5. 5.

    http://www.obspy.org.

  6. 6.

    http://sox.sourceforge.net.

  7. 7.

    www.seismicsoundlab.org.

  8. 8.

    http://www.seg.ethz.ch/software/axisem.

  9. 9.

    http://global.shakemovie.princeton.edu.

  10. 10.

    http://seis.earth.ox.ac.uk/axisem/.

References

  1. Nissen-Meyer, T., van Driel, M., Stähler, S.C., Hosseini, K., Hempel, S., Auer, L., Fournier, A.: AxiSEM: broadband 3-D seismic wavefields in axisymmetric media. Solid Earth Discuss. 6(1), 265–319 (2014). doi:10.5194/sed-6-265-2014. http://www.solid-earth-discuss.net/6/265/2014/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, B.: The internal ‘orchestra’ of the Earth. The Boston Globe, January 2008

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dombois, F.: Auditory seismology: on free oscillations, focal mechanisms, explosions and synthetic seismograms. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Auditory Display (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Furumura, T.: Visualization of 3D wave propagation from the 2000 Tottori-ken Seibu, Japan, earthquake: observation and numerical simulation. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93(2), 870–881 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartmann, W.M.: How we localize sound. Phys. Today 52(11), 24–29 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, A., Leigh, J., Morin, P., van Keken, P.: Geowall: stereoscopic visualization for geoscience research and education. IEEE Comput. Graph. 26, 10–14 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahn, D.: Earth Sound Earth Signal. University of California Press, Berkeley (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Komatitsch, D., Ritsema, J., Tromp, J.: The spectral-element method, beowulf computing, and global seismology. Science 298(5599), 1737–1742 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Komatitsch, D., Tromp, J.: Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation. Geophys. J. Int. 139(3), 806–822 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Komatitsch, D., Tromp, J.: Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation - I. Validation. Geophys. J. Int. 149(2), 390–412 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nissen-Meyer, T., Fournier, A., Dahlen, F.A.: A 2-D spectral-element method for computing spherical-earth seismograms-I. Moment-tensor source. Geophys. J. Int. 168, 3 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peng, Z., Aiken, C., Kilb, D., Shelly, D.R., Enescu, B.: Listening to the 2011 magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki, Japan, earthquake. Seismol. Res. Lett. 83(2), 287–293 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shearer, P.: Introduction to Seismology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Simpson, D., Peng, Z., Kilb, D.: Sonification of earthquake data: from wiggles to pops, booms and rumbles. AGU Fall Meeting 2009, January 2009

    Google Scholar 

  15. Speeth, S.D.: Seismometer sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33(7), 909–916 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tromp, J., Komatitsch, D., Hjörleifsdóttir, V., Liu, Q., Zhu, H., Peter, D., Bozdag, E., McRitchie, D., Friberg, P., Trabant, C., Hutko, A.: Near real-time simulations of global CMT earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int. 183(1), 381–389 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Turk, M.J., Smith, B.D., Oishi, J.S., Skory, S., Skillman, S.W., Abel, T., Norman, M.L.: yt: a multi-code analysis toolkit for astrophysical simulation data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 9 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker, B., Nees, M.: Theory of Sonification. Principles of Sonification: An Introduction to Auditory Display and Sonification Chap. 2, pp. 1–32 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We have the good fortune of working with Pritwiraj Moulik, Anna Foster, Jin Ge, Yang Zha, Pei-ying Lin and Matthew Vaughan at LDEO and Lapo Boschi at Univ. Paris VI. They have taught us a great deal of Seismology and contributed generously to many aspects of the project. In addition to co-author Daniel Peter, Vala Hjorleifsdottir, Brian Savage, Tarje Nissen-Meyer and Jeroen Tromp have all contributed to bringing SPECFEM and AXISEM into this project. Art Lerner-Lam gave us the initial financial support and scientific encouragement when we began this project for the LDEO Open House in 2006. David Simpson, Douglas Repetto, Nolan Lem, George Lewis and Dan Ellis have provided encouragement and assistance on computer music/sound aspects. Denton Ebel, Carter Emmart and Rosamond Kinzler have made possible bringing this project to the Hayden Planetarium. This work is directly supported by NSF grant EAR-1147763, “Collaborative Research: Immersive Audio\(-\)Visualization of Seismic Wave Fields in the Earth (Earthscope Education & Outreach)” to B. Holtzman and NSF grants ACI-1339624 and ACI-1048505 to M. Turk.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Holtzman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Scaling Frequency and Duration

Appendix: Scaling Frequency and Duration

In the process of shifting the frequency of a seismic signal, the number of samples (or data points) in the waveform signal (\(n\)) does not change. All that changes is the time interval assigned between each sample, \(dt\), where the sampling frequency, \(f_{Sam} = 1/dt\). Broadband seismometers generally have sampling rates of 1, 20 or 40 Hz. For sound recording a typical sampling frequency is 44.1 kHz. In the context of frequency shifting, consider an arbitrary reference frequency \(f_{Ref}\) such that \(f_{Ref}/f_{Sam}<1\), because \(f_{Ref}\) must exist in the signal. When considering frequency shifting in which the number of samples does not change, this ratio must be equal before and after frequency shifting.

In the problem at hand, we refer to the original sampling rate of the seismic data as \(f_{Sam}^e\) (for “earth”), with reference frequency \(f_{Ref}^e\), and the shifting sampling rate and reference frequency as \(f_{Sam}^s\) and \(f_{Ref}^s\), (for “sound”) respectively, such that

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{f_{Ref}^e}{f_{Sam}^e} = \frac{f_{Ref}^s}{f_{Sam}^s} \end{aligned}$$
(1)

As illustrated in Fig. 2, we look at the Fourier transform (FFT) of the original signal, choose a reference frequency based on what part of the signal spectrum that we want to hear (e.g. 1 Hz for body waves), and then choose a reference frequency to shift that value to (e.g. 220 Hz, towards the low end of our hearing). We then re-arrange Eq. 1 to determine the new sampling rate:

$$\begin{aligned} f_{Sam}^s = \frac{f_{Ref}^s}{f_{Ref}^e} f_{Sam}^e \end{aligned}$$
(2)

which is entered as an argument into the “wavwrite” function in MATLAB.

Similarly, duration is \(t=n.dt\) where \(n\) is the total number of samples, and \(dt\) is the time step in seconds between each data point or sample. Since \(n\) is constant for the original data and the sound (\(n_e = n_s\)), we can write \(\frac{t_e}{dt_e} = \frac{t_s}{dt_s}\). This is usefully re-arranged to

$$\begin{aligned} t_s = \frac{f_{Sam}^e}{f_{Sam}^s} t_e, \end{aligned}$$
(3)

which is useful for synchronizing the sounds with animations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Holtzman, B., Candler, J., Turk, M., Peter, D. (2014). Seismic Sound Lab: Sights, Sounds and Perception of the Earth as an Acoustic Space. In: Aramaki, M., Derrien, O., Kronland-Martinet, R., Ystad, S. (eds) Sound, Music, and Motion. CMMR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8905. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12976-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12976-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12975-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12976-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics