Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prominence in Relative Clause Attachment: Evidence from Prosodic Priming

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Explicit and Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 46))

Abstract

This chapter presents two experiments utilizing prosodic adaptations of the structural priming paradigm. In each experiment, the goal was to explore the relation between the location of a prosodic boundary and the preferred parsing of a relative clause (RC) with ambiguous attachment to a preceding head noun. In Experiment 1, using read materials, ambiguous target sentences were preceded by prime sentences with RCs of different length: long, medium, and short. RC length was hypothesized to influence the location of an implicit prosodic boundary in the primes. However, no effect for this RC-length manipulation was found. In Experiment 2, the location of a boundary was manipulated in overt (spoken) prime sentences. For these auditorily-presented primes, the location of a prosodic boundary was found to influence attachment preference for targets. Interestingly, the effect was in the opposite direction as predicted: In the configuration NP1 NP2 RC, a boundary after NP2 resulted in more NP2 attachments. We propose that in the experimental materials, which contained equivalent accents on the two noun phrases (NPs), the boundary after NP2 leads to the accent on NP2 being interpreted as the nuclear pitch accent. Consequently, that accent was perceived as being more prominent than the accent on NP1, thus attracting RC attachment. The results suggest a close relationship between prosodic phrasing and prosodic prominence in English, and demonstrate a role for both in sentence processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Augurzky, P. (2006). Attaching relative clauses in German: The role of implicit and explicit prosody in sentence processing (Vol. 77). Leipzig: MPI Series in Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males, females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). Package lme4. Version 1.0-5 (10/25/2013). http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed Jan 2014.

  • Beckman, M. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent (Netherlands Phonetic Archives 7). Dordrecht: Foris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M., & Edwards, J. (1994). Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In P. A. Keating (Ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in laboratory phonology III (pp. 7–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M., & Hirschberg, J. (1994). The ToBI annotation conventions. Columbus: Ms. The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, A., & Ito, K. (2007). Attachment of ambiguous RCs: A production study. Talk given at the 13th annual conference on architectures and mechanisms for language processing (AMLaP), Turku, Finland, 24–27 Aug 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, A., Armstrong, M., & Maday, K. (2008). Relative clause attachment in English and Spanish: A production study. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, Campinas, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. (2012a). Focus, prosody, and individual differences in “autistic” traits: Evidence from cross-modal semantic priming. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 111, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. (2012b). Information structural expectations in the perception of prosodic prominence. In G. Elordieta & P. Prieto (Eds.), Prosody and meaning (interface explorations). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. (2013). Prenuclear accentuation: Phonetics, phonology, and information structure. PhD dissertation, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18,355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, M., Fedorenko, E., Wagner, M., & Gibson, E. (2010). Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 1044–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D. C. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(3), 664–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. Jr. (1993). Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech, 36, 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussias, P. E. (2003). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in second language learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 529–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, K., Fernández, E. M., Fodor, J. D., Stenshoel, E., & Vinereanu, M. (1999). Low attachment of relative clauses: New data from Swedish, Norwegian, and Romanian. Poster presented at the 12th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, New York, 18–20 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felser, C., Marinis, T., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition, 11, 127–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, E. M. (2003). Bilingual sentence processing: Relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, E. M., & Bradley, D. (1999). Length effects in the attachment of relative clauses in English. Poster presented at the 12th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to parse. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 285–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. (2002). Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. NELS, 32, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1990). Parsing modifiers: Special purpose routines in the human sentence processing mechanism? In D. A. Balota, G. G. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 303–330). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeth, M., Sheppard, E., Ramachandran, R., & Milne, E. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison of autistic traits in the UK, India and Malaysia. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. [On-line version ahead of print publication doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1808-9].

  • Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., Scheepers, C., & Strube, G. (1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in German. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 293–312). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, R., Bartels, M., Cath, D., & Boomsma, D. (2008). Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): A study in Dutch population and patient groups. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1555–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A. (1996) The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody: Intonational phonology and prosodic structure. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A. (2003a). Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 219–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A. (2003b). The effect of phrase length and speech rate on prosodic phrasing. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, XV, 483–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A. (2005). Prosodic typology. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 430–458). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A. (2007) The intermediate phrase in Korean intonation: Evidence from sentence processing. In C. Gussenhoven & T. Riad (Eds.), Tones and tunes: Studies in word and sentence prosody (pp. 143–167). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A. (2010). The implicit prosody hypothesis and overt prosody in English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7), 1201–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A. (2014). Prsodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 520–539). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A., & Kim, S. (2004). Default phrasing and attachment preferences in Korean. Proceedings of Interspeech-ICSLP, Jeju, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A., & Koike, C. (2003). Default prosody and RC attachment in Japanese. Talk given at the 13th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference, Tucson, AZ. [Published in Japanese-Korean Linguistics 3, 41–53, CSLI, Stanford, in 2008].

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A., & Shilman, M. (2008). Default phrasing and English relative clause attachment data. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, Campinas, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E.-K., & Watson, D. G. (2011). Effects of pitch accents in attachment ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 262–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovric, N., Bradley, D., & Fodor, J. D. (2001). Silent prosody resolves syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from Croatian. Presented at the SUNY/CUNY/NYU Conference, Stonybrook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwland, M., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. (2010). On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 324–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D., Abdelghany, H., & Fodor, J. D. (2000). More evidence of implicit prosody in silent reading: French, English and Arabic relative clauses. Poster presented at 13th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.0.2). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed Jan 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruta, L., Mazzone, D., Mazzone, L., Wheelwright, S., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). The autism-spectrum quotient: Italian version: A cross-cultural confirmation of the broader autism phenotype. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 625–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, A. J., Carter, J., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1996). Focus in relative clause construal. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 135–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekerina, I. A., Fernández, E. M., & Petrova, K. A. (2004). Relative clause attachment in Bulgarian. In O. Arnaudova, W. Browne, M. L. Rivero, & D. Stojanović (Eds.), The proceedings of the 12th annual workshop on formal approaches to Slavic linguistics. The Ottawa meeting 2003 (pp. 375–394). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (2000). The interactions of constraints on prosodic phrasing. In M. Horne (Ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonié, S., Kassai, B., Pirat, E., Bain, P., Robinson, J., Gomot, M., Barthélémy, C., Charvet, D., Rochet, T., Tatou, M., Assouline, B., Cabrol, S., Chabane, N., Arnaud, V., Faure, P., & Manificat, S. (2012). The French version of the autism-spectrum quotient in adolescents: A cross-cultural validation study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–6 (online version accessed: doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1663-0).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, B., Demset, T., Hambrick, D., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, K., Konopka, A. E., & Watson, D. (2013). Can intonational phrase structure be primed (like syntactic structure)? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Nov 4. [Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1037/a0034900].

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, R., Royer, A., Ito, K., & Speer, S. (2014). Prominence perception in and out of context. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014, 1164–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Tojo, Y. (2006). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) in Japan: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, N., Otake, T., & Arai, T. (2010). Intonational structure as a word boundary cue in Japanese. Language and Speech, 53, 107–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, M., Grove, J., & Giannakidou, A. (2011). Interference “licensing” of NPIs: Pragmatic reasoning and individual differences. Poster presented at the 24th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, M., Grove, J., & Giannakidou, A. (2013). Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 708. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, University of California, 3125 Campbell Hall, Box 951543, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1543, USA

    Sun-Ah Jun

  2. Linguistics Program, City University of New York (College of Staten Island and The Graduate Center), New York, NY, USA

    Jason Bishop

Authors
  1. Sun-Ah Jun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jason Bishop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun-Ah Jun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA

    Lyn Frazier

  2. Department of Psychology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Edward Gibson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jun, SA., Bishop, J. (2015). Prominence in Relative Clause Attachment: Evidence from Prosodic Priming. In: Frazier, L., Gibson, E. (eds) Explicit and Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12961-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation