Abstract
For the last decade I have been demonstrating that many of the so-called paradoxes generated by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics have less puzzling analogs in nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory. This raises questions about the possibility of nonlinearities inherent in the foundations of quantum theory. Since most of us do not think intuitively with nonlinear logic, I take this opportunity to dwell on several peculiarities of nonlinear dynamics and chaos: nonlinear logic itself and the possible connection of infinite nonlinear regressions with free will. Superficially, nonlinear dynamics can be every bit as counterintuitive as quantum theory; yet, its apparent paradoxes are more amenable to logical analysis. As a result, using nonlinear dynamics to resolve quantum paradoxes winds up being more straightforward than many of the alternative interpretations currently being formulated to replace the orthodox interpretation. Chaos theory could be a candidate for bridging the gap between the determinism so dear to Einstein and the statistical interpretation of the Copenhagen School: For deterministic chaos is indeed deterministic; however, intrinsic limitations on precision in measuring initial conditions necessitate analyzing it statistically. Einstein and Bohr both could have been correct in their debates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 44, 777 (1935)
S. Weinberg, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.), 194, 336 (1989).
N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A143, 1 (1990)
B. Mielnik, Phys. Lett. A289, 1 (2001)
M.J. Feigenbaum, Foreword, in Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science, 2nd edn., ed. by H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens, D. Saupe (Springer, New York, 2003), p. 1.
Wm.C. McHarris, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 306, 012050 (2011).
Wm.C. McHarris, Complexity, 12(4), 12 (2007).
S. Bleher, C. Grebogi, E. Ott, Phys. D 46, 87 (1990)
J.V. José, E.J. Saletan, Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach, Chap. 4, Sect. 4.1.3 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
M. Gell-Mann, C.J. Tsallis (eds.), Nonextensive Entropy: Interdisciplinary Applications (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004)
T. Shinbrot, F.J. Muzzio, Phys. Today 53(3), 25 (2000)
W.D. Hillis, The Pattern on the Stone: The Simple Ideas That Make Computers Work (Basic Books, New York, 1998)
J.R. Koza, M.A. Keane, M.J. Streeter, Sci. Am. Feb. 52 (2003).
C. Korda, Fractice Mandelbrot Deep Zoom to \(2^{\wedge }{316}\) (Bigger than the Universe), http://vimeo.com/6035941
J. Conway, S. Kochen, Found. Phys. 36(10), 1441 (2006). A series of six informative lectures by John Conway can be found at http://web.math.princeton.edu/facultypapers/Conway
J. Ford, in The New Physics, ed. by P. Davies, Chap. 12 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
L. Smolin, The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, 2006)
P. Woit, Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory & the Continuing Challenge to Unify the Laws of Physics (Basic Books, New York, 2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McHarris, W.C. (2015). It from Bit from It from Bit ... Nature and Nonlinear Logic. In: Aguirre, A., Foster, B., Merali, Z. (eds) It From Bit or Bit From It?. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12946-4_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12946-4_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12945-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12946-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)