Skip to main content

A Rough Set Based Total Quality Management Approach in Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complex System Modelling and Control Through Intelligent Soft Computations

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 319))

Abstract

Contrary to the popular belief that TQM is a poor fit in higher education sector, this research proposes a Rough Set Theory (RST) based model for grading educational institution using TQM parameters. It is a well established fact that TQM needs major reshaping before it can be effectively applied in higher education sector for quality assessment and improvement. This chapter takes a balance view by employing RST approach in TQM architecture and eliminating the much publicized shortcomings of TQM approach. RST theory has advantage of working on a small size of data containing vague and imprecise information which is widely prevalent in education sector. A carefully drafted questionnaire, containing nine attributes, is used for generating research data from the different stake holders in higher educational institutes of India. Nine modified condition attributes are selected on the basis of literature survey and expert views which are subsequently treated with RST analysis. One decision parameter ‘Grade’ depends on nine independent condition attributes. The resultant model contains only two significant attributes namely, ‘Effective Learning and Teaching’ and ‘Administrative Setup’ which can effectively determine the grading of educational institutions. Results of this study may be utilized to improve the higher education quality through appropriate grading mechanism based on self assessment of quality parameters by the different stakeholders of the education sector. The study confirms that TQM can be useful to enhance both quasi-academic areas such as ‘administrative setup’ along with core academic area ‘effective teaching and learning’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharjya, D. P., & Bhattacharjee, D. (2013). A rough computing based performance evaluation approach for educational institutions. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 7(4), 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tarawneh, H. (2011). The implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM) on higher educational sector in Jordan. International Journal of Industrial Marketing, 1(1), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altahayneh, Z. L. (2014). Implementation of Total Quality Management in colleges of physical education in Jordan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(3), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andollo, A. A., Rambo, C. M., & Monari, F. (2013). Influence of quality management systems on service provision in The University Of Nairobi, Kenya. African Journal of Business and Management, 3, 98–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., Rungtusanatham, M., & Schroeder, R. G. (1994). A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 472–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becket, N., & Brookes, M. (2008). Evaluating qualtiy management in university departments. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(2), 123–142. doi:10.1108/09684880610662015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. H., Yang, C. C., Shiau, J. Y., & Wang, H. H. (2006). The development of an employee satisfaction model for higher education. The TQM Magazine, 18(5), 484–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1982). Out of the crisis. MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1994). Report card on TQM. Management Review, 83(1), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. L. (1993). TQM: A warning for higher education. Educational Record, 74(2), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortuna, R. M. (1990). The quality imperative. In E. C. Huge (Ed.), Total quality: An executive’s guide for the 1990s. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary, W., David, S., & Derek, Z. (2005). Academic preparation, effort and success: A comparison of student and faculty Perceptions. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(2), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world class excellence. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hellsten, U., & Klefsjo, B. (2000). TQM as a management system consisting of values, techniques and tools. The TQM Magazine, 12(4), 238–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Y., Lomas, L., & MacGregor, J. (2003). Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D. J., & Studman, C. J. (2001). Quality management and a university: A deafening clash of metaphors? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(5), 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H. M. (2007). Influence of the environment on innovation performance of TQM. Total Quality Management, 18(7), 715–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, M. (2006). Kaizen, the key to Japan’s competitive success. United State of America: Mc-Graw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanji, G. K., Tambi, A. M. B. A., & Wallace, W. (1999). A comparative study of quality practices in higher education institutions in the US and Malaysia. Total Quality Management. 10(3), 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J. V., & Fisher, J. L. (1998). Higher education and total quality management’. Total Quality Management, 9(8), 659–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maji, P. K., & Roy, A. R. (2002). An application of soft sets in a decision making problem. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 44(8–9), 1077–1083.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Manjula, R., Vaideeswaran, J., & Acharjya, D. P. (2012). A capability maturity decision making system for educational quality based on rough computing. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 45, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooi, B. K., Bakar, A. N., Arumugam, V., Vellapan, L., & Loke, Y. K. A. (2007). Does TQM influence employees’ job satisfaction? An empirical case analysis, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(1), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and International Sciences, 11(3), 341–356.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. (1991). Rough sets, theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., & Skowron, A. (2007a). Rough sets: Some extensions. Information Sciences, 177(1), 28–40.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., & Skowron, A. (2007b). Rudiments of rough sets. Information Science, 177(1), 3–27.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., & Skowron, A. (2007c). Rough sets and Boolean reasoning. Information Sciences, 177(1), 41–73.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Prędki, B., & Wilk, S. (1999). Rough set based data exploration using ROSE system. In Z.W. Ras, A. Skowron (Eds.), Foundations of intelligent, lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 1609, pp. 172–180). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, R., & Ralston, F. (1984). Total quality management: A revolutionary management philosophy. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 49, 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruben, B. D. (1995). Quality in higher education. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis, E. (2002). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). UK: Kogan Page LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sila, I. (2007). Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance through the lens of organizational theories: An empirical study. Journal of Operations management, 25(1), 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirvanci, M. B. (2004). Critical issues for TQM implementation in higher education. The TQM Magazine, 16(6), 382–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart, W. A. (1931). Economic control of quality of manufactured product. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talib, F. (2013). An overview of total quality management: Understanding the fundamentals in service organization. International Journal of Advanced Quality Management, 1(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vashist, R., & Garg, M. L. (2011). Rule generation based on reduct and core: A rough set approach. International Journal of Computer Application, 29(9), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vashist, R., & Garg, M. L. (2012). A rough set approach for generation and validation of rules for missing attribute values of a data set. International Journal of Computer Application, 42(14), 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazzana, G., Elfrink, J., & Bachman, D. P. (2000). A longitudinal study of total quality management processes in business colleges. Journal of Education for Business, 76(2), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, S. (2007). A framework for implementing TQM in higher education programs. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(1), 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, P. (2000). Benchmarking in higher education: An Australian case study. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(1), 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, H., Klefsjö, B., Wiklund, P. S., & Edvardsson, B. (2003). Innovation and TQM in Swedish higher education institutions—possibilities and pitfalls. The TQM Magazine, 15(2), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (1999). Assuring quality and standards in globalised higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 7(1), 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabadi, A. M. (2013). Implementing Total Quality Management (TQM) on the higher education institutions: A conceptual model. Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 42–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Taher Azar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Azar, A.T., Vashist, R., Vashishtha, A. (2015). A Rough Set Based Total Quality Management Approach in Higher Education. In: Zhu, Q., Azar, A. (eds) Complex System Modelling and Control Through Intelligent Soft Computations. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12883-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12883-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12882-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12883-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics