Advertisement

Market Regulations and USO in the Revised Swiss Postal Act: Provisions and Authorities

  • Christian JaagEmail author
  • Martin Maegli
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP, volume 50)

Abstract

New postal legislation in Switzerland entered into force on October 2012. It encompasses a new Postal Act as well as a new Postal Organization Act. The reform of the Postal Act covers three main areas. The first is market regulation, which applies to all operators symmetrically. It includes the replacement of the former licensing system by compulsory registration and provisions on ex-post regulation of mutual access to PO boxes and address data. Second, it restates the definition of the Universal Service Obligation (USO), with different provisions for services offered to private and business customers and distinguishing between the accessibility of postal and financial services. Third, the new Postal Act defines a new institutional design, i.e. the division of tasks, organization and responsibility of public authorities in the postal sector. The Postal Organization Act governs Swiss Post’s range of activity, its corporatization and the spin-off of its financial services branch PostFinance.

Keywords

Post Office Price Regulation Postal Service Reserved Area Universal Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. DETEC. (2009). Strategic objectives of the Swiss Federal Council for Swiss Post 2010–2013. Bern: Swiss Confederation.Google Scholar
  2. Haller, A., Jaag, C., & Trinkner, U. (2014). USO cost allocation rules and welfare (Swiss Economics Working Paper 49, Zurich).Google Scholar
  3. Hugentobler, A., & Jaag, C. (2014). Switzerland: The role of Swiss Post in indirect press support. In P. Murschetz (Ed.), State aid for newspapers. Theories, cases, actions. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. IPC. (2011). Regulatory database 2011. Brussels: International Postal Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Jaag, C. (2011). What is an unfair burden? Compensating the net cost of universal service provision. Review of Network Economics 10(3), 1–30.Google Scholar
  6. Jaag, C. (2013). Price regulation and the financing of universal services in network industries. Review of Law and Economics, 9(1), 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaag, C., & Trinkner, U. (2009). Tendering universal service obligations in liberalized network industries. Journal for Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 10(4), 313–332.Google Scholar
  8. Maegli, M., & Jaag, C. (2012). Competition and the social cost of regulation in the postal sector (Swiss Economics Working Paper 32, Zurich).Google Scholar
  9. Swiss Federal Council. (2009). Botschaft zum Postgesetz. Federal Council. Bern: Federal Chancellery.Google Scholar
  10. WIK. (2005). The evolution of the regulatory model for European postal services. Bad Honnef: Study for DG Internal market, European Commission.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swiss EconomicsZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Swiss PostBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations