Advertisement

E-commerce and the Return of Unwanted Goods: A Case for Cooperation Among Providers of Postal and Non-postal Parcel Services

  • Ralf WojtekEmail author
Chapter
  • 956 Downloads
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP, volume 50)

Abstract

With the rapid development of e-commerce, new forms of distance sales have developed. Although consumers still prefer to order goods from domestic suppliers, the market for consumer goods has grown global. As a consequence, the European Commission in its Green Paper on Parcels (European Commission 2012, p. 4) expresses its intention to improve the conditions for the cross-border transportation of goods in order to facilitate e-commerce. In Chap. B of the Roadmap issued subsequently to its Green Paper (European Commission 2013), the Commission defined as its objective to help boost e-commerce in the EU by providing e-traders and consumers with parcel delivery services that meet their needs in terms of quality, accessibility and affordability. The Roadmap defined two areas of concern: from the consumers’ perspective, the lack of transparency and information about available redress mechanisms; and from the e-traders’ perspective, a lack of transparency on delivery services and choice of availability of delivery solutions. In addition, the Roadmap focuses on the lack of interoperability between delivery companies when faced with diverging operational solutions.

Keywords

Post Office Private Operator Return Service Branch Office Essential Facility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Borsenberger, C. (2015). The concentration phenomenon – In e-commerce. In M.A. Crew & T.J. Brennan (eds).Google Scholar
  2. Commission Notice on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict competition under Art. 81 (1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (de minimis) (2001/C 368/07) O.J. 22.12.2001 (“de minimis Notice”).Google Scholar
  3. Commission Notice on the definition of relevant market for the purposes of Community competition law (97/C 372/03) O.J. C 372, 09.12.1997.Google Scholar
  4. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1218/2010 of 14.12.2010 on the application of Art. 101 (3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of specialisation agreements, O.J. L 335/43, 18.12.2010 (“Block Exemption Specialisation”).Google Scholar
  5. Copenhagen Economics. (2013). E-commerce and delivery – A study on the state of play of EU parcel markets with particular emphases on e-commerce, European Commission DG Internal Market and Services, July 15, 2013 (“EU Study on the State of Play”).Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. (2003). Decision of 23 October 2003, case COMP/C/38.170 O. J. L 56/76, 24.02.2004 (“REIMS II”).Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2004). Communication from the Commission – Notice – Guidelines on the application of Article 81 (3) of the Treaty (2004 / C 101/08) O.J. 27.04.2004.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2009). Communication from the Commission, Guidance on the Commission’s Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings, O.J. 2009, C-45/7 (“Guidance on Enforcement”).Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2010a). Commission Notice, Guidelines on Vertical Restraints (SEC (2010) 411) (“Guidelines on Vertical Restraints”).Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2010b). Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Art. 101 (3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices, O.J. L 102/1 of 23/4/2010 (“Block exemption for vertical co-operation”).Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2010c). Communication from the Commission, Guidelines on the applicability of Art. 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements, SEC (2010) 512/2 (“Guidelines on horizontal agreements”).Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2012). Green Paper, an integrated parcel delivery market for the growth of e-commerce in the EU, 29.11.2012, COM (2012) 698 final (“Green Paper”).Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2013). Communication from the Commission, A roadmap for completing the single market for parcel delivery – Building consumer trust in delivery services and encouraging on line sales, 11/2013 (“Roadmap”).Google Scholar
  14. European Union. (2008). Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment or the internal market of Community postal services, O.J. L 52/3, 27.02.2008 (“Postal Directive”).Google Scholar
  15. European Union. (2011). Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on Consumer Rights, O.J. L 304/64, 22.11.2011 (“Consumer Rights Directive”).Google Scholar
  16. Hearn, J. (2014). Delivering the goods to households: ‘Would further regulation help or hinder?’. In M. A. Crew & T. J. Brennan (Eds.), The role of the postal and delivery sector in a digital age (pp. 146–160). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. International Post Corporation. (2011). http://annualreview.ipc.be/en/e-commerce-and-parcels/ERS. (“IPC Annual Review 2011”).
  18. International Post Corporation. http://www.ipc.be/en/operational-services/capability-visibility/ERS_FAQ. (“IPC homepage”).
  19. ITA/WIK, Evolution of the European Postal Market since 1997, Study for the European Commission DG Internal Market and Services. (Brussels, 2009).Google Scholar
  20. Langen, E., & Bunte, H. J. (2011). Kommentar zum deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht (11th ed.) (p. 180). Munich.Google Scholar
  21. University of Regensburg, ibi Research. (2012). e-commerce-Leitfaden (3rd ed.). Regensburg. (“Leitfaden”).Google Scholar
  22. University of Regensburg, ibi Research. (2013). Retourenmanagement im Online-Handel. Regensburg. (“Retourenmanagement”).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Heuking Kühn Lüer WojtekHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations