Advertisement

On the Detection of Market and Intangible Benefits Through Consumer Surveys

  • Marcello Cuomo
  • Tommaso Nardone
  • Alberto Rovero
  • Gennaro ScarfiglieriEmail author
Chapter
  • 870 Downloads
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP, volume 50)

Abstract

The 2008/6/CE Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 20 February 2008, states that the net cost of universal service obligations (USO) is to be calculated as the difference between the net cost for a designated Universal Service Provider (USP) operating under USO and that of the same provider operating without USO. The Directive also requires taking into account in the calculation any other relevant elements, including “any intangible and market benefits which accrue to a postal service provider designated to provide universal service”. With the transposition of the Directive into national legislations, Member States are required to implement a mechanism for the calculation of the USO net cost which will fulfill the provisions of the Directive, including an evaluation of the intangible benefits enjoyed by the USP.

Keywords

Universal Service Provider (USP) Universal Service Obligation (USO) Current Account Services Demand Complementarities Financial Services Customers 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bergum, K. (2008). Calculating the net cost of the USO: A practical example from Norway. In M. A. Crew, P. R. Kleindofer, & J. I. Capbell Jr. (Eds.), Handbook of worldwide postal reform (Advances in regulatory economics series). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.Google Scholar
  2. Copenhagen Economics. (2011). Manual for calculating the net cost of the USO. Report prepared for FICORA.Google Scholar
  3. Frontier Economics. (2013).,Study on the principles used to calculate the net costs of the postal USO. Report prepared for the European Commission.Google Scholar
  4. Fustier, F., Janin, L., & Sahly, R. (2014). Net cost calculation: A practical example concerning La Poste and its territorial presence obligation. In M. A. Crew & T. J. Brennan (Eds.), The role of the postal and delivery sector in a digital age (Advances in regulatory economics series). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Jaag, C., Lisle, J., Trinkner, U., Waghe, N., & van der Merwe, E. (2011). Practical approaches to USO costing and financing. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, 12(2), 108–129.Google Scholar
  6. London Economics. (2002). Benefits of universal services provision to consignia. Report prepared for Postwatch.Google Scholar
  7. Panzar, J. (2000). A methodology for measuring the costs obligations. Information Economics and Policy, 12(3), 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. WIK-Consult. (2010).,Avantages immatériels dans le cadre du service universel postal. Report prepared for ARCEP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcello Cuomo
    • 1
  • Tommaso Nardone
    • 1
  • Alberto Rovero
    • 1
  • Gennaro Scarfiglieri
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Strategic Planning, Poste ItalianeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations