Advertisement

Regulatory Developments in Post and Telecommunications: A Tale of Two Industries

  • Henrik B. Okholm
  • Anna Möller
  • Bruno BasaliscoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP, volume 50)

Abstract

In several countries, post and telecommunication are regulated by the same agency tasked to oversee both sectors. Unsurprisingly, postal regulators may draw upon the experience of telecoms regulation when designing postal regulation. Examples of policymakers, who have attempted to change the model of postal regulation inspired by telecoms are the Dutch legislators (2013) and the Italian regulator AGCOM (2012). This enables the regulators to impose access-based competition in the postal sector, which has been a key element in telecom regulation. Moreover, the EC 2012 Green Paper on parcel delivery and e-commerce queried whether price and competition issues in intra-EU cross-border parcel delivery justify the introduction of a price cap or other ex-ante regulation in the postal sector similar to the EU roaming regulation in telecoms.

Keywords

Access Policy Access Price Access Charge Network Industry Postal Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AGCOM. (2013). Consultation – Delibera 384/13/CONS.Google Scholar
  2. Bourreau, M., Cambini, C., & Hoernig, S. (2012). Ex ante regulation and co-investment in the transition to next generation access. Telecommunications Policy, 36(5), 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cave, M. (2006). Encouraging infrastructure competition via the ladder of investment. Telecommunications Policy, 30(3), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conseil de la Concurrence. (2007). Avis n° 07-A-17 du 20 décembre 2007 relatif à une de-mande d’avis de l’ ARCEP sur le dispositif de remises commerciales de La Poste.Google Scholar
  5. Copenhagen Economics. (2013). E-commerce and delivery: A study of the state of play of EU parcel markets with particular emphasis on e-commerce. Prepared for the European Commission. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  6. Crew, M. A., & Kleindorfer, P. R. (2010). Access and the USO under full market opening. In M. A. Crew & P. R. Kleindorfer (Eds.), Heightening competition in the postal and delivery sector (p. 3). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. De Bijl, P. W. J., et al. (2006). Regulating access to stimulate competition in postal markets? In M. A. Crew & P. R. Kleindorfer (Eds.), Progress toward liberalization of the postal and delivery sector. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. ERGP. (2012). Report on “access” to the postal network and elements of postal infrastructure.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2007). Roaming regulation. (EC) No 717/2007.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2011). MEMO/11/929. State aid: Commission adopts new package on State aid rules for services of general economic interest (SGEI) – Frequently asked questions. December 20, 2011.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2012). Green paper – An integrated parcel delivery market for the growth of e-commerce in the EU.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2014). Call for tenders: Review of the scope of universal service – Study SMART 2014/0011.Google Scholar
  13. House of Commons Business and Enterprise Committee. (2009). Postal Services Bill. Fifth re-port of session 2008–2009, (Vol. 2). Oral and written Evidence. The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  14. NERA. (2004). Economics of postal services. A report for the European Commission.Google Scholar
  15. Ofcom. (2012). Securing the Universal Postal Service – Decision on the new regulatory framework.Google Scholar
  16. Ofcom. (2013). Fixed access market reviews.Google Scholar
  17. Ofcom. (2013b). End-to-end competition in the postal sector.Google Scholar
  18. States-General of the Netherlands. (2013). Law amending the Postal Act 2009 to introduce ex ante monitoring a post carrier with significant market power legislation on SMP regulation of post.Google Scholar
  19. WIK. (2010). Netzzugang und Zustellwettbewerb im Briefmarkt.Google Scholar
  20. WIK. (2013). Main developments in the postal sector (2010–2013) – WIK Consult/Jim Campbell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrik B. Okholm
    • 1
  • Anna Möller
    • 1
  • Bruno Basalisco
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Copenhagen EconomicsCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations