Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Employee’s Human Capital and the Work Environment on the Creation of Organizational Spin-Offs: Evidence from Spain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship, Human Capital, and Regional Development

Part of the book series: International Studies in Entrepreneurship ((ISEN,volume 31))

Abstract

Previous studies have recognized the relevance of certain individual (generic and specific human capital) and organizational (work environment) factors in the creation of new ventures from and for an existing organization. The objective of this exploratory study is to understand the roles of employee human capital and the work environment on the creation of organizational spin-offs. Adopting the human capital and the corporate entrepreneurship approaches, a conceptual framework was proposed and tested with data from the 2012 Spanish Adult Population Survey (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, GEM). Due to the nature of the data and research objective, a rare event model was used for the analysis. Our results provide evidence about the relevant roles of specific human capital (entrepreneurship educational training) and the work environment (job autonomy) on the propensity that an employee becomes an intrapreneur and leads a spin-off “from” and “for” their employer. We also show that a stronger moderation effect of job autonomy takes place in the relationship between entrepreneurship education and organizational spin-off creation. In general, these results would help employees, top managers, and policy makers take into account the relevance of these individual and organizational factors when defining their strategic decisions/planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2012, in the Spanish questionnaire, the Basque Country Team added some questions that allow for the identification of employees involved in the creation of spin-offs for their employer.

  2. 2.

    On average, the age of an entrepreneur in Spain is 37 years old. Therefore, we consider this age range to take into account the individuals with a higher propensity to becoming entrepreneurs.

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoncic B, Hisrich RD (2001) Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. J Bus Ventur 16:495–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold KA, Turner N, Barling J, Kelloway EK, McKee MC (2007) Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: the mediating role of meaningful work. J Occup Health Psychol 12:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell CM, Holman DJ, Unsworth KL, Wall TD, Waterson PE, Harrington E (2000) Shopfloor innovation: facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. J Occup Organ Psychol 73(3):265–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1964) Human capital. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellu R, Davidsson P, Goldfarb C (1990) Toward a theory of entrepreneurial behavior: empirical evidence from Israel, Italy, and Sweden. Entrep Reg Dev 2(2):195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bindl UK, Parker SK (2010) Proactive work behaviour: forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In: APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 2. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 567–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower DG (2004) Self-employment: more may not be better, no. w10286. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma NS, Levie J (2010) Global entrepreneurship monitor 2009. Executive report. Babson College, Babson Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma NS, Stam FC, Wennekers ARM (2010) Intrapreneurship: an international study. Scales, Utrecht University, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus RH (1982) The psychology of the entrepreneur. In: Kent CA, Sexton DL, Vespers ICH (eds) Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Slevin D (1991) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrep Theory Pract 16(1):7–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson P (1995) Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions. In: RENT IX conference, Piacenza, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 18(3):301–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong JPJ, Parker S, Wenneker S, Wu C (2011) Corporate entrepreneurship at the individual level: measurement and determinants. In: EIM research reports. EIM, Zoetermeer

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmar F, Davidsson P (2000) Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrep Reg Dev 12:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess GG, Lumpkin GT, McGee JE (1999) Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure, and process: suggested research directions. Entrep Theory Pract 23(3):85–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer FC, Dickinson JA (1994) Development of sun compensation by honeybees: how partially experienced bees estimate the sun’s course. Proc Natl Acad Sci 91(10):4471–4474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Entrepreneurship education in Europe: fostering entrepreneurial mindsets through education and learning. In: Final proceedings of the conference on entrepreneurship education in Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans D, Leighton L (1989) Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. Am Econ Rev 79:519–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman J, Engel JS (2007) Models of innovation: startups and mature corporations. Calif Manage Rev 50(1):94–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller JB, Marler LE, Hester K (2006) Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J Organ Behav 27:1089–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasse Y (1982) Elaborations on the psychology of the entrepreneur. In: Kent CA, Sexton DL, Vespers KH (eds) Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno J, Folta T, Cooper A, Woo C (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Adm Sci Q 42:750–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman G, Hanlon D, King W (1997) Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education and education for small business management: a ten-year literature review. Int Small Bus J 15(3):56–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilo I, Thurik AR (2008) Determinants of entrepreneurial engagement levels in Europe and the US. Ind Corp Change 17(6):1113–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpaz I, Fu X (2002) The structure of the meaning of work: a relative stability amidst change. Hum Relat 55:639–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich RD, Peters MP (1986) Establishing a new business venture unit within a firm. J Bus Ventur 1(3):307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honig B (1996) Education and self-employment in Jamaica. Comp Educ Rev 40(2):177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby JS, Naffziger DW, Kuratko DF, Montagno RV (1993) An interactive model of the corporate entrepreneurship process. Entrep Theory Pract 17(2):29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF, Montagno RV (1999) Perception of internal factors for corporate entrepreneurship: a comparison of Canadian and U.S. managers. Entrep Theory Pract 24(2):9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF, Zahra SA (2002) Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. J Bus Ventur 17(3):253–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter RM (1985) Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies. J Bus Ventur 1:47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlan D, Valdivia M (2011) Teaching entrepreneurship: impact of business training on microfinance clients and institutions. Rev Econ Stat 93(2):510–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King G, Zeng L (2001a) Logistic regression in rare events data. Polit Anal 9(2):137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King G, Zeng L (2001b) Explaining rare events in international relations. Int Organ 55(3):693–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper S (2001) Employee start-ups in high-tech industries. Ind Corp Change 10:639–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koellinger P (2008) Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others? Small Bus Econ 31(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko DF (2005) The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges. Entrep Theory Pract 29(5):577–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko D, Montagno RV, Hornsby J (1990) Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strateg Manage J 11:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • LePine JA, Van Dyne L (1998) Predicting voice behavior in work groups. J Appl Psychol 83(6):853–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levie J, Autio E (2008) A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Bus Econ 31(3):235–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm Å (1994). The Economics of Technology-Related Ownership Changes. A study of innovativeness and growth through acquisitions and spin-offs. Chalmers University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvel MR, Griffin A, Hebda J, Vojak B (2007) Examining the technical corporate entrepreneurs’ motivation: voices from the field. Entrep Theory Pract 31(5):753–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manag Sci 29(7):770–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naman JL, Slevin DP (1993) Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: a model and empirical tests. Strateg Manage J 14:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan VK, Yang Y, Zahra SA (2009) Corporate venturing and value creation: a review and proposed framework. Res Policy 38(1):58–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord WR, Brief AP, Atieh JM, Doherty EM (1990) Studying meanings of work: the case of work values. In: Brief A, Nord W (eds) Meanings of occupational work: a collection of essays. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbeek H, van Praag M, Ijsselstein A (2010) The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. Eur Econ Rev 54(3):442–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parhankangas A, Arenius P (2003) From a corporate venture to an independent company: a base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms. Res Policy 32(3):463–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SC (2009) The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SC (2011) Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? J Bus Ventur 26(1):19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1967) The tacit dimension. Routledge and Kegan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD (1997) Who starts new firms? Preliminary explorations of firms-in-gestation. Small Bus Econ 9(5):449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds P, Bosma N, Autio E, Hunt S, De Bono N, Servais I, Chin N (2005) Global entrepreneurship monitor: data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Bus Econ 24:205–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso BD, Dekas KH, Wrzesniewski A (2010) On the meaning of work: a theoretical integration and review. Res Organ Behav 30:91–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford MW, Holt DT (2007) Corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical look at the innovativeness dimension and its antecedents. J Organ Chang Manag 20(3):429–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathe V (1985) Managing an entrepreneurial dilemma: nurturing entrepreneurship and control in large corporations. In: Hornaday JA, Shils EB, Timmons JA, Vesper KH (eds) Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Babson College, Wellesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton DL, Kent CA (1981) Female executives and entrepreneurs: a preliminary comparison. In: Proceedings of the entrepreneurship research conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manage Rev 25(1):217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane S, Locke EA, Collins CJ (2003) Entrepreneurial motivation. Hum Resour Manag Rev 13(2):257–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris V, Zerbinati S, Al Laham A (2007) Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. J Bus Ventur 22(4):566–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson HH, Jarillo JC (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. Strateg Manage J 11(5):17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapido D (2004) Binding conflict: the competition-to-cooperation switch in firm dyads. Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger JM, Rauch A, Frese M, Rosenbusch N (2011) Human capital and entrepreneurial success. A meta-analytical review. J Bus Ventur 26(3):341–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sluis J, Van Praag CM (2007) Returns to education for entrepreneurs and employees: identification by means of changes in compulsory schooling laws. Working paper, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sluis J, Van Praag M, Van Witteloostuijn A (2006) Why are the returns to education higher for entrepreneurs than for employees? Working paper, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA (1991) Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 6(4):259–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Covin JG (1995) Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship–performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. J Bus Ventur 10:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Nielsen AP, Bogner WC (1999) Corporate entrepreneurship knowledge and competence development. Entrep Theory Pract 23:169–189

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deusto Business School, Mundaiz 50, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain

    Eissa Alrumaithi, Maribel Guerrero & Iñaki Peña

Authors
  1. Eissa Alrumaithi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maribel Guerrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Iñaki Peña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maribel Guerrero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. International Entrepreneurship, CEG-IST, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal, and Brunel Business School, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom

    Rui Baptista

  2. Department of Management and Economics, School of Social and Human Sciences and The Centre for Management Studies of Instituto Superior Técnico (CEG-IST), University of Beira Interior and University of Lisbon, Covilhã, Portugal

    João Leitão

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alrumaithi, E., Guerrero, M., Peña, I. (2015). The Role of Employee’s Human Capital and the Work Environment on the Creation of Organizational Spin-Offs: Evidence from Spain. In: Baptista, R., Leitão, J. (eds) Entrepreneurship, Human Capital, and Regional Development. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12871-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation