Abstract
This chapter investigates the implicit neoclassical assumption that the quantity of economic output can become decoupled from energy inputs. While trends in the energy intensity of US real GDP seem to give evidence for decoupling, this chapter investigates the possibility that such evidence is a methodological artifact that results from the use of monetary value to measure output. The following hypothesis is proposed: rather than measure output, monetary value functions as a feedback mechanism for controlling biophysical throughput. This hypothesis is tested using a metric called “energy-specific purchasing power”. Historical evidence supports the conclusion that monetary value does function as a feedback mechanism and that evidence for decoupling is a methodological artifact. The implications for a biophysical growth theory are discussed.
If it is very easy to substitute other factors for natural resources, then there is in principle no “problem”. The world can, in effect, get along without natural resources.
– Robert Solow (1974, p. 11)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Value of fossil fuel production from Enersy Information Administratio (EIA), Annual Energy Review, Table 3.2. Value of fossil fuel imports from ibid, Table 3.7. Nominal GDP from BEA Table 1.1.5.
- 2.
Relative standard deviation is defined as the standard deviation divided by the data mean and multiplied by 100 %.
- 3.
I use the word specific to disambiguate from the more common notion of purchasing power, which typically refers to the ability to consume a basket of goods or services, rather than a single good.
- 4.
While an individual could conceivably spend his entire income on a single commodity, it is impossible (and absurd) for a nation to do so. For instance, if the USA spent its entire nominal GDP on fossil fuel energy, its energy consumption would be greater than that for the entire world, and no other goods or services would be generated.
References
Ayres R, Warr B (2009) The economic growth engine: how energy and work drive material prosperity. Edward Elgar Publications, Northampton
Blas J, Wallis W (2014) Nigeria almost doubles GDP in recalculation. Financial Times
British Petroleum (2012) BP statistical review of world energy. British Petroleum, London
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2010) Frequently asked questions about hedonic quality adjustment in the CPI. http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpihqaqanda.htm. Accessed 24 June 2013
Carter SB, Gartner SS, Haines MR, Olmstead AL, Sutch R, Wright G (2006) Historical statistics of the United States: Millennial Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
CEC - Commission of the European Communities (2002) Sixth community environment action programme. Off J Eur Union L242:0001–0015
Chandler D (2010) Explained: The carnot limit. http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2010/explained-carnot-0519. Accessed 27 May 2014
Daly H (1997) Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz. Ecol Econ 22(3):261–266
Giampietro M, Mayumi K, Sorman A (2012) The metabolic pattern of societies: where economists fall short. Routledge, New York
Giampietro M, Mayumi K, Sorman A (2013) Energy analysis for a sustainable future: multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism. Routledge, New York
Griliches Z (1992) Introduction to “output measurement in the service sectors”. In: Output measurement in the service sectors. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–22
Guilford MC, Hall C, O’Connor P, Cleveland C (2011) A new long term assessment of energy return on investment (EROI) for US oil and gas discovery and production. Sustainability 3(10):1866–1887
Jerven M (2012) Lies, damn lies and GDP. The Guardian
Jerven M (2014) Economic growth and measurement reconsidered in Botswana, Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia, 1965–1995. Oxford University Press, Oxford
King CW, Hall C (2011) Relating financial and energy return on investment. Sustainability 3(10):1810–1832
Meadows DH (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New American Library, New York
Meadows DH (2012) The energy & finance systems: Mismatched dynamics. In: Money, debt, and energy: Biophysical realities for fairytale economies, Burlington, VT. http://www.uvm.edu/jdericks/BPE4/p2s1.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2013
Nitzan J (1992) Inflation as restructuring. a theoretical and empirical account of the US experience. PhD thesis, McGill University
OECD (2003) Environmental indicators: development, measure, and use. OECD Environment Directorate Environmental Performance and Information Division. Paris
Sakellaris P, Wilson DJ (2004) Quantifying embodied technological change. Rev Econ Dyn 7(1):1–26
Sherwood MK (1994) Difficulties in the measurement of service outputs. Mon Labor Rev 117(3):11–19
Smith GD, Hart C, Upton M, Hole D, Gillis C, Watt G, Hawthorne V (2000) Height and risk of death among men and women: aetiological implications of associations with cardiorespiratory disease and cancer mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health 54(2):97–103
Soddy F (1926) Virtual wealth and debt: the solution of the economic paradox. George Allen & Unwin, London
Solow RM (1974) The economics of resources or the resources of economics. Am Econ Rev 64(2): 1–14
Steindel C (1995) Chain-weighting: the new approach to measuring GDP. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York 1(9)
Stern D (2004) Economic growth and energy. Encyclopedia Energy 2:35–51
Stiglitz J (1974) Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. Rev Econ Stud (Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources) 41:123–137
UN (1977) Guidelines on principles of a system of price and quantity statistics. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistical Papers M(59)
Warr B (2009) REXS database. https://sites.google.com/site/benjaminwarr/the-economic-growth-engine/rexs-database. Accessed 9 April 2012
Warr B, Ayres R (2012) Useful work and information as drivers of economic growth. Ecol Econ 73:93–102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s) - SpringerBriefs
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fix, B. (2015). Decoupling. In: Rethinking Economic Growth Theory From a Biophysical Perspective. SpringerBriefs in Energy(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12826-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12826-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12825-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12826-9
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)