Advertisement

Knowledge Sharing by Students: Preference for Online Discussion Board vs Face-to-Face Class Participation

  • Shaheen Majid
  • Pan Yang
  • Huang Lei
  • Guo Haoran
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8839)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate students’ preference for participation in face-to-face and online discussions, and the factors that can either motivate or pose barriers to knowledge sharing. A questionnaire was used for data collection and 149 post-graduate students from two public universities in Singapore participated in this study. It was found that a majority (82.5%) of the students preferred in-class face-to-face discussions for knowledge sharing and a majority of them agreed that the factors such as encouragement by instructors, challenging discussion topics, and thought provoking questions from instructors and classmates were likely to motivate them to participate. The motivating factors for participation in online discussions were: more time to refine ideas, less nervousness, and flexible access to online discussion boards. The major barriers to face-to-face participation were shyness and uninteresting topics. On the other hand, the major hurdles to online discussions were un-friendly interface and time constraints.

Keywords

Knowledge Sharing Collaborative Learning Online Discussion Class Discussion English Language Proficiency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Artino, A.R.: Online or face-to-face learning? Exploring the personal factors that predict students’ choice of instructional format. The Internet and Higher Education 13(4), 272–276 (2010), doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Augustsson, G.: Web 2.0, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students. Internet & Higher Education 13(4), 197–205 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell, M., Gibson, W., Hall, A., Richards, D., Callery, P.: Online vs. face-to-face discussion in a Web-based research methods course for postgraduate nursing students: a quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 45(5), 750–759 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.12.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dallimore, E.J., Hertenstein, J.H., Platt, M.B.: Class participation in accounting courses: Factors that affect student comfort and learning. Issues in Accounting Education 25(4), 613–629 (2010), doi:10.2308/iace.2010.25.4.613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Green, R.A., Farchione, D., Hughes, D.L., Chan, S.: Participation in asynchronous online discussion forums does improve student learning of gross anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education 7(1), 71–76 (2014), doi:10.1002/ase.1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, J.: Influence of group size on students’ participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 62123–62129 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, G.: Speaking up: Six Korean students’ oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars. English for Specific Purposes 28(3), 142–156 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Majid, S., Tina, R.R.: Perceptions of LIS graduate students of peer learning. In: Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education and Practice (A-LIEP), Japan, March 6-8 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Majid, S., Yeow, C.W., Audrey, C.S.Y., Shyong, L.R.: Enriching learning experience through class participation: A students’ perspective. In: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly: Satellite Meeting on Cooperation and Collaboration in Teaching and Research, Gothenburg, Sweden, August 8-9 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Majid, S., Mon, A.A., Soe, C.M., Htut, S.M.: Students’ perceptions of knowledge sharing through class participation. In: International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing, Paris, France, October 26-29 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyer, K.A.: Student perceptions of face-to-face and online discussions: The advantage goes To... Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(4), 55–69 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’connor, K.J.: Class participation: Promoting in-class student engagement. Education 133(3), 340–344 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qiu, M., McDougall, D.: Foster strengths and circumvent weaknesses: Advantages and disadvantages of online versus face-to-face subgroup discourse. Computers & Education 67, 1–11 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ratsoy, G.R.: Class participation in an aboriginal theatre project: An exemplar of undergraduate student engagement. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2(1), 13 (2011), http://dx.doi.org.ezlibproxy1.ntu.edu.sg/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2011.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steel, A., Laurens, J., Huggins, A.: Class participation as a learning and assessment strategy. Law: Facilitating Students’ Engagement, Skills Development and Deep Learning. University of New South Wales Law Journal 36(1), 30–55 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sulisworo, D.: Designing the online collaborative learning using the Wikispaces. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Learning 7(1), 58–61 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tani, M.: Raising the in-class participation of Asian students through a writing tool. Higher Education Research and Development 27(4), 345–356 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yukselturk, E.: An investigation of factors affecting student participation level in an online discussion forum. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET 9(2), 24–32 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaheen Majid
    • 1
  • Pan Yang
    • 1
  • Huang Lei
    • 1
  • Guo Haoran
    • 1
  1. 1.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore

Personalised recommendations