Advertisement

An Evaluation Study of the Automating Metadata Interoperability Model at Schema Level: A Case Study of the Digital Thai Lanna Archive

  • Churee Techawut
  • Lalita Tepweerapong
  • Choochart Haruechaiyasak
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8839)

Abstract

In digital library, large digital information is collected with some deviations of metadata structures. Various types of metadata standards and application profiles containing different sets of metadata elements are primarily concerned for information sharing and accessing among several digital collections. To allow information interoperability, librarians and domain experts traditionally take in a part of matching those metadata elements, which is a time consuming task. To alleviate the problem, a basic automating metadata interoperability model (AMI Model) is proposed for matching between two sets of simple level metadata elements by implementing a Crosswalk method based on the estimation of the semantic similarity values. The proposed model is evaluated on a case study of the Digital Thai Lanna archive based on the Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) performance measures. The result shows the proposed model accuracy is higher than the average accuracy at high acceptance level.

Keywords

Automating Metadata Interoperability Crosswalk Semantic Similarity Digital Thai Lanna Archive Filtering Basic Global Thresholding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan, L.M., Zeng, M.L.: Metadata Interoperability and Standardization - A Study of Methodology Part I: Achieving Interoperability at Schema Level. D-Lib Magazine (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    NISO (National Information Standards Organization).: Understanding Metadata. NISO Press (2004) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Troncy, R., Bailer, W., Hausenblas, M., Hoffernig, M.: VAMP: Semantic Validation for MPEG-7 Profile Descriptions. Technical Report INS-E0705 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hliaoutakis, A., Varelas, G., Voutsakis, E., Petrakis, G.E., Milios, E.: Information Retrieval by Semantic Similarity. Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 55–73 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warin, M., Volk, H.: Using WordNet and Semantic Similarity to Disambiguate an Ontology. Stockholms University (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    WordNet: A Lexical Database for English, http://wordnet.princeton.edu
  7. 7.
    RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised), http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax
  8. 8.
    Tepweerapong, L.,Techawut, C.:Experimental Study on Automating Metadata Interopera-bility Model Among Application Profilesat Simple Level. In: The 3rd CMU Graduate Re-search Conference, pp. 195–202 (2012) (in Thai) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thresholding: Digital Image Analysis, http://www.cpe.eng.cmu.ac.th
  10. 10.
    Trakarnpan, A.: Prototype of Metadata for Heritage Manuscripts Digitisation Initiative for Traditional Manuscripts of Northern Thailand, pp. 121–125. Pulinet (2010) (in Thai) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Techawut, C.: Metadata Creation: Application for Thai Lanna Historical and Traditional Archives. In: Chowdhury, G., Koo, C., Hunter, J. (eds.) ICADL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6102, pp. 144–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christopher, D.M., Prabhakar, R., Hinrich, S.: Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Churee Techawut
    • 1
  • Lalita Tepweerapong
    • 1
  • Choochart Haruechaiyasak
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Science Department, Faculty of ScienceChiang Mai UniversityThailand
  2. 2.National Electronics and Computer Technology CenterNational Science and Technology Development AgencyThailand

Personalised recommendations