Abstract
This introduction to the second edition of Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism assesses how far the field of historical archaeology has come in its study of capitalism and its effects since the publication of the first edition in 1999. Recent scholarship has revolutionized the ways in which archaeologists conceptualize capitalism and its effects, and the chapter highlights important new ideas useful to the future of historical archaeology. Although we set out several themes that have united historical scholarship that focuses on capitalism and its effects, the chapter also discusses the diversity of theoretical and methodological approaches, power relations, material culture, and subjects that the authors in this volume and other recent scholarship investigate. Less neat and united than earlier approaches to the study of capitalism, current approaches ensure that the “modern world” studied by historical archaeology is not reduced to the extension of European or North American paradigms globally; that capitalism can no longer be seen as a unified homogeneous system that operates in the same way across time and space; and that there is room to explore the borders, margins, orders, and disorders created and perpetuated by capitalist economies and resistance to them. In the second half of the chapter, Mark Leone describes and introduces updated rationales for the purpose of historical archaeology, the place of artifacts, and the place of social criticism, using the work of Slavoj Žižek.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Beginning in the late nineteenth century, North American sociologists began to encourage the study of urban poverty among African American residents in cultural terms, focusing on past and present treatment and opportunities, in order to reject explanations of poverty based on biological notions of racial inferiority (DuBois 1996[1899]; Frazier 2001[1939]. In the early twentieth century, canonical sociology, including scholars working within the traditions of the Chicago School, adopted similar arguments that addressed culture as the site of human difference, instead of biology. The “culture of poverty” idea was proposed by Oscar Lewis (1959) and discussed the idea that in addition to lacking resources, the poor had also developed a poverty-perpetuating system of values, which held them back from material progress. Lewis’ ideas were later used in ways not anticipated by the author (including the Moynihan Report published in 1965) to place the blame for poverty on its victims (Bourgois 2003, p. 64). Surviving harsh critique in the mid- to late-twentieth century, the “culture of poverty” idea and “underclass” arguments of William Julius Wilson (2012) became popular ways in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries to explain poverty and inequality as neoliberalism blossomed. The “culture of poverty” and “underclass” concepts both focused on cultural arguments, occluding the structural constraints placed on those living in poverty.
References
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and the ideological state apparatuses. Translated from the French by Ben Brewster. In Lenin and Philosophy. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.
Bourgois, P. (2003). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Castaneda, Q. E., & Matthews, C. (2008). Ethnographic archaeologies, reflections on stakeholders and archeological practices. Lanham: Altamira.
Croucher, S. K., & Weiss, L. (2011a). The archaeology of capitalism in colonial contexts, an introduction: Provincializing historical archaeology. In S. K. Croucher & L. Weiss (Eds.), The archaeology of capitalism in colonial contexts: Postcolonial historical archaeologies. New York: Springer.
Croucher, S. K., & Weiss, L. (Eds.). (2011b). The archaeology of capitalism in colonial contexts: Postcolonial historical archaeologies. New York: Springer.
Dawdy, S. L. (2010). Clockpunk anthropology and the ruins of modernity. Current Anthropology, 51(6), 761–93.
DuBois, W. E. B. (1996[1899]). The Philadelphia Negro: A social study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Elias, N. (1989). El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas. México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Frazier, E. F. (2001[1939]). The Negro family in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Funari, P. P., Hall, M., & Jones, S. (Eds.). (1999). Historical archaeology: Back from the edge. New York: Routledge.
Gadsby, D. A., & Barnes, J. A. (2010). Activism as archaeological praxis: Engaging communities with archaeologies that matter. In M. J. Stottman (Ed.), Archaeologists as activists: Can archaeologists change the world. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Gonzalez-Ruibal, A. (2008). Time to destroy: An archaeology of supermodernity. Current Anthropology, 49(2), 247–279.
Handsmen, R. (1981). Early capitalism and the center village of Canaan, Connecticut: A study of transformations and separations. Artifacts, 9(3), 1–22.
Hantman, J. L. (2004). Monacan meditation: Regional and individual archaeologies in the contemporary politics of Indian heritage. In P. A. Shackel & E. J. Chambers (Eds.), Places in mind: Public archaeology as applied anthropology. New York: Routledge.
Hicks, D., & Beaudry, M. C. (2006). Introduction: The place of historical archaeology. In D. Hicks & M. C. Beaudry (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to historical archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Historians Against Slavery (n. d.) Electronic document, accessed 1 May 2014, http://www.historiansagainstslavery.org/main/.
Johnson, M. (1996). An archaeology of capitalism. New York: Blackwell.
Joyce, R. A., & Pollard, J. (2010). Archaeological assemblages and practices of deposition. In M. C. Beaudry & D. Hicks (Eds.), The oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leone, M. P. (1981). Archaeology’s relation to the present and the past. In R. Gould & M. Schiffer (Eds.), Modern material culture: The archaeology of us. London: Academic.
Leone, M. P. (1984). Interpreting ideology in historical archaeology: Using the rules of perspective in the William Paca Garden in Annapolis, Maryland. In D. Miller & C. Tilley (Eds.), Ideology, power, and prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leone, M. P. (1999). Setting some terms for historical archaeologies of capitalism. In M. P. Leone & P. B. Potter, Jr. (Eds.), Historical archaeologies of capitalism. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Leone, M. P. (2005) The archaeology of liberty in an American capital: Excavations in Annapolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Leone, M. P., & Potter, P. (Eds.). (1999). Historical archaeologies of capitalism. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Leone, M. P., Potter, P. B., Jr., & Shackel, P. A. (1987). Toward a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology, 28(3), 283–302.
Lewis, O. (1959). Five families: Mexican case studies in the culture of poverty. New York: Basic Books.
Lightfoot, K. G. (1995) Culture contact studies: Redefining the relationship between prehistoric and historical archaeology. American Antiquity, 60(2), 199–217.
Little, B. J. (1994). People with history: An update on historical archaeology in the United States. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1(1), 5–40.
Matthews, C. N. (2010) The archaeology of American capitalism. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Matthews, C. N., Leone, M. P., & Jordan, K. A. (2002). The political economy of archaeological cultures: Marxism and American historical archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology, 2(1), 109–134.
McDavid, C. (2002). Archaeologies that hurt; Descendants that matter: A Pragmatic approach to collaboration in the public interpretation of African-American archaeology. World Archaeology, 34(2), 303–314.
McGuire, R. H. (1992). A Marxist archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
McGuire, R. H. (2006). Marxism and capitalism in historical archaeology. In D. Hicks & M. Beaudry (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to historical archaeology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McGuire, R. H. (2008). Archaeology as political action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
McGuire, R. H., & Paynter, R. (1991). The archaeology of inequality. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Nicholas, G., & Hollowell, J. (2007). Ethical challenges to a postcolonial archaeology: The legacy of scientific colonialism. In Y. Hamilakis & P. Duke (Eds.), Archaeology and capitalism: From ethics to politics. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Orser, C. E., Jr. (1996). A historical archaeology of the modern world. New York: Plenum Publishers.
Orser, C. E., Jr. (2001). The anthropology in American historical archaeology. American Anthropologist, 103(3), 621–632.
Orser, C. E., Jr. (2007). The archaeology of race and Racialization in historic America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Orser, C. E., Jr. (2010). Twenty-first-century historical archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research, 18(2), 111–150.
Orser, C. E., Jr. (2013). The politics of periodization. In A. Gonzalez-Ruibal (Ed.), Reclaiming archaeology: Beyond the tropes of modernity. New York: Routledge.
Palus, M. M., Leone, M. P., & Cochran, M. D. (2006). Critical archaeology: Politics past and present. In M. Hall & S. W. Silliman (Eds.), Historical archaeology. Malden: Blackwell.
Paynter, R. (1985). Surplus flow between frontiers and homelands. In S. W. Green & S. M. Perlman (Eds.), The archaeology of frontiers and boundaries, Orlando: Academic Press.
Paynter, R. (1988). Steps to an archaeology of capitalism: Material Culture and Class Analysis. In M. P. Leone & P. B. Potter, Jr. (Eds.), The recovery of meaning: historical archaeology in the Eastern United States. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Paynter, R. (2000). Historical and anthropological archaeology: Forging alliances. Journal of Archaeological Research, 8, 1–37.
Sayers, D. O., Burke, P. B., & Henry, A. M. (2006). The political economy of exile in the great dismal swamp. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 11(1), 60–97.
Schmidt, P. R., & Walz, J. R. (2007). Re-representing African pasts through historical archaeology. American Antiquity, 72(1), 53–70.
Shackel, P. A. (2009). The archaeology of American labor and working class life. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Shackel, P. A., & Chambers, E. J. (2004). Places in mind: Public archaeology as applied anthropology. New York: Routledge.
Shklar, J. N. (1971). Subversive genealogies. In C. Geertz (Ed.), Myth, symbol, and culture, New York: W.W. Norton.
Silliman, S. W. (2006). Struggling with Labor, working with identities. In M. Hall & S.W. Silliman (Eds.), Historical archaeology. Malden: Blackwell.
Voss, B. L. (2008). The archaeology of ethnogenesis: Race and sexuality in colonial San Francisco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wesler, K. W. (1998). Historical archaeology in West Africa. In K.W. Wesler (Eds.), Historical archaeology in Nigeria. Trenton: Africa World Press.
Wilkie, L. A., & Bartoy, K. M. (2000). A critical archaeology revisited. Current Anthropology, 42(5), 747–777.
Wilson, W. J. (2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wolf, E. R. (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wood, M. C. (2002). Moving towards transformative democratic action through archaeology. Historical Archaeology, 6(3), 187–198.
Wurst, L. (2006). A class all its own: Explorations of class formation and conflict. In M. Hall & S.W. Silliman (Eds.), Historical Archaeology. Malden: Blackwell.
Wylie, A. (1999). Why should historical archaeologists study capitalism? The logic of question and answer and the challenge of systemic analysis. In M. Leone & P.B. Potter, Jr. (Eds.), Historical archaeologies of capitalis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Žižek, S. (2012). Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. Brooklyn: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leone, M., Knauf, J. (2015). Introduction to Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, Second Edition. In: Leone, M., Knauf, J. (eds) Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism. Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12760-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12760-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12759-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12760-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)