Skip to main content

The Explicit Supercritical Singular Peak-Type Solution \(\psi _Q^\mathrm{{explicit}}\)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

Part of the book series: Applied Mathematical Sciences ((AMS,volume 192))

  • 4792 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we present the explicit singular peak-type solution \(\psi _Q^\mathrm{explicit}\) of the supercritical NLS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Unlike Eq. (12.6), see Theorem 12.1, there is currently no proof that solutions of (12.8) exist.

  2. 2.

    See Definition 11.1.

  3. 3.

    If \(c_1 = 0\), then \(Q \sim c_2 Q_2\). Therefore, the integral is finite, and the proof is immediate.

  4. 4.

    The reason why the condition of a finite Hamiltonian is “more important” than that of a finite power will become clear in Sect. 21.1.

  5. 5.

    This phase represents focusing with \(F(z) = -{L}/{L_z}\), see Sect. 2.12.2.

  6. 6.

    See, e.g., Sect. 17.6.2.

  7. 7.

    For example, the unique value of \(a\) that corresponds to an admissible solution of the cubic three-dimensional NLS is

    $$ a_Q(\sigma =1,d=3) \approx 0.917. $$
  8. 8.

    Using the Matlab code in Fig. 12.1.

  9. 9.

    When \(d=1\) we can set \(\gamma =1\), since \(\gamma _0 = -\frac{1}{\sigma }\) and \(\gamma _1 +2 = 3+\frac{1}{\sigma }\) (Lemma 12.7).

  10. 10.

    See Lemma 12.8.

  11. 11.

    Thus, for any \(J\), \(Q_{K=0,J}\) converges to the trivial solution \(R^{(-1)}(\rho ) \equiv 0\), \(Q_{K=1,J}\) converges to the ground state \(R^{(0)}(\rho )\), etc.

  12. 12.

    This is different from the critical case, where all the explicit peak-type blowup solutions \(\psi _{R^{(n)}}^\mathrm{explicit}\) are unstable (Sect. 10.6). It is, however, analogous to the explicit ring-type blowup solutions \(\psi _G^\mathrm{explicit}\) of the critical NLS, for which the single-ring solution is stable but the multi-rings solutions are unstable (Sect. 11.4.1). In that case, the single-ring solution is the “least non-monotone”.

  13. 13.

    Recall that for \(H^1\) NLS solutions, blowup of the \(H^1\) norm implies blowup of the \(L^p\) norms for \( 2 \sigma +2 \le p \le \infty \) (Corollary 5.8).

  14. 14.

    The value of \(c_2\) cannot be equal to zero, see Lemma 12.12.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gadi Fibich .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fibich, G. (2015). The Explicit Supercritical Singular Peak-Type Solution \(\psi _Q^\mathrm{{explicit}}\) . In: The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol 192. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12748-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics