Skip to main content

Governmental Administration and the Security of Romania in a Global Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geopolitics, Development, and National Security

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Political Science ((BRIEFSPOLITICAL))

  • 808 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the economic and political management of change, with a view towards increasing administrative performance so as to increase government performance and security. Change is seen as a staple of the post-1989 age of globalized “chaotic changes and uncertainties,” where simply reconciling bureaucracy with democracy can no longer be sufficient for any administration. On the other hand, although globalization seems to have had a “flattening,” i.e. homogenizing, effect on civil society, the management of local market and administrative challenges can only be successfully carried out by thoroughly considering local specifics, not by importing foreign methods or solutions. To illustrate, the authors present the case of Romania, detailing its administrative evolution and difficulties from national state inception to European integration and beyond (ultimately from a normative to a managerial character), pointing out past errors and future recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Davis (2007).

  2. 2.

    Friedman (2005).

  3. 3.

    Friedman (1999); Fukuyama (2006); Ōmae (1990).

  4. 4.

    Korten (2001); Kaplan (2000).

  5. 5.

    Lewin (1992).

  6. 6.

    Weick and Sutcliffe (2001).

  7. 7.

    Prigogine and Stengers (1997).

  8. 8.

    Handy (1989).

  9. 9.

    Priesmeyer (1992).

  10. 10.

    Morgan (2006); Handy (1989); Murphy (1996); Farazmand (2003, pp. 339–372).

  11. 11.

    Goetz (2001, pp. 1032–1051).

  12. 12.

    Zamfir (2004); Horga (2004).

  13. 13.

    Layne (2006, pp. 7–41).

  14. 14.

    Crăciun (2008).

  15. 15.

    Elgin (1977, pp. 337–349).

  16. 16.

    Niskanen (1971).

  17. 17.

    Waldo (1980).

  18. 18.

    Rogers et al. (2006); Kiel (1994); Murphy (1996); Nonaka (1988, pp. 57–73).

  19. 19.

    Lewin (1992); Prigogine and Stengers (1997).

  20. 20.

    Peters (2001).

  21. 21.

    Capra (1982); Weick and Sutcliffe (2001); Jantsch (1980).

  22. 22.

    Ogilvy (2002).

  23. 23.

    Jantsch (1980).

  24. 24.

    Hoffmann (2006); Johnson (2006).

  25. 25.

    Ferguson (2004); Friedman (2005).

  26. 26.

    Wolf (2004, p. 18).

  27. 27.

    Korten (2001); Brecher (1994).

  28. 28.

    Johnson (2006).

  29. 29.

    Dugger (1989).

  30. 30.

    Korten (2001); Rogers et al. (2006)

  31. 31.

    Agnew (2005).

  32. 32.

    Dugger (1989).

  33. 33.

    Goetz (2001).

  34. 34.

    Gabel and Whitten (1997, pp. 81–96).

  35. 35.

    Bache (2010, pp. 1–12).

  36. 36.

    Hitchins (1996).

  37. 37.

    Huntington (1996).

  38. 38.

    Meyer-Sahling and European University Institute Max Weber Programme (2008).

  39. 39.

    Kornai and Oxford University Press (1992, p. 109).

  40. 40.

    Kornai and Oxford University Press (1992, p. 136).

  41. 41.

    Giosan (2008).

  42. 42.

    Meyer-Sahling and European University Institute Max Weber Programme (2008).

  43. 43.

    Nunberg (1999); Verheijen and NISPAcee (2001).

  44. 44.

    Meyer-Sahling and European University Institute Max Weber Programme (2008).

  45. 45.

    Goetz (2001); Meyer-Sahling and European University Institute Max Weber Programme (2008); Dimitrov (2005).

  46. 46.

    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and Support for Improvement in Governance and Management in Central and Eastern European Countries (1998, pp. 168–179).

  47. 47.

    Dimitrova (2002, pp. 171–90); Grabbe (2002).

  48. 48.

    Meyer-Sahling (2006, pp. 274–297); O’Dwyer (2002).

  49. 49.

    Negrescu (2002); Giosan (2008).

  50. 50.

    Păunescu (2006, 2008); Mărginean (2001).

  51. 51.

    Dobre (2010, pp. 59–70).

  52. 52.

    Dobre (2010).

  53. 53.

    Matei and Dogaru (2011); Peterson (2008, pp. 247–269).

  54. 54.

    Romania (1995, p. 1), paragraph 3.

  55. 55.

    Munteanu (2006); Crăciun and Collins (2008).

  56. 56.

    Lasswell (1951); Hogwood (2000).

  57. 57.

    Dye (1995).

  58. 58.

    Bărbulescu (2001); Bărbulescu (2005); Birzea (2001); Birzea (2005); Morar (2002, pp. 77–113).

  59. 59.

    Presidency of the European Council Conclusions, Copenhagen, 1993 (1993).

  60. 60.

    Morar (2002).

  61. 61.

    Morar (2002).

  62. 62.

    Bădescu (2008).

  63. 63.

    The Romanian Constitution of 2003, Article 120, paragraph 1

  64. 64.

    Bondar (n. d.); Munteanu (2006); The decentralization of public services: A never-ending story? (2008).

  65. 65.

    Matei and Matei (2010).

References

  • Agnew, J. A. (2005). Hegemony: The new shape of global power. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I. (2010). Europeanization and multi-level governance: EU cohesion policy and pre-accession aid in Southeast Europe. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea, 10(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bădescu, G. (2008). Democratizare, Valori Si Educaţie şcolară (Democratization, Values and School Education). Bucharest: Soros Foundation Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bărbulescu, I. G. (2001). Uniunea Europeană—Aprofundare Şi Extindere: De La Comunitățile Europene La Uniunea Europeană. (The European Union—Integration and Expansion: From European Communities to the European Union). Bucharest: Editura Trei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bărbulescu, I.G. (2005). UE de La Economic La Politic, (EU from Economics to Politics). Bucharest: Tritonic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birzea, C. (2001). Politicile şi instituţiile Uniunii Europene, (The Politics and Institutions of the EU). Bucharest: Corint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birzea, C. (2005). Cetăţenia Europeană, (European Citizenship). Bucharest: Politeia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondar, F. (n. d.). Politicile Şi Instituţiile Uniunii Europene, (Public policies and public administration). Bucharest: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, J. (1994). Global village or global Pillage: Economic reconstruction from the bottom up. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society, and the rising culture. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crăciun, C. (2008). The transformation of governance in Romania. Challenges for public policy management. Iaşi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, I. (2007, Oct). Government as a business. McKinsey Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, V. (2005). Governing after Communism: Institutions and policymaking. Governance in Europe. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, A. (2002). Enlargement, institution-building and the EU’s administrative capacity requirement. West European Politics, 25(4):171–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobre, A. M. (2010). Europeanization and new patterns of multi-level governance in Romania. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(1):59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dror, Y. (2001). The capacity to govern: A report to the club of Rome. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, W. M. (1989). Corporate Hegemony. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R. (1995). Understanding public policy. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, S. D. (1977, Dec). The limits to complexity: Are bureaucracies becoming unmanageable? The Futurist 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2003). Chaos and transformation theories: A theoretical analysis with implications for organization theory and public management. Public Organization Review, 3(4):339–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2004). Colossus: The price of America’s empire. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L. (1999). The lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M, & Whitten, G. D. (1997). Economic conditions, economic perceptions, and public support for European integration. Political Behavior, 19(1):81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giosan, V. (2008). Reforma Sectorului Public Şi Reforma Clasei Politice: Este Posibilă Sincronizarea? (The Public Sector Reform and Political Class Reform: Is the Synchronization Possible?). In C. Crăciun(Eds.), Managementul Politicilor Publice: Transformări şi Perspective. Iaşi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, K. (2001). Making sense of post-communist central administration: Modernization, Europeanization or latinization? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6):1032–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, H. (2002). European union conditionality and the acquis communitaire. International Political Science Review, 23(3), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. B. (1989). The age of unreason. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchins, K. (1996). The Romanians, 1774–1866. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (2006). Chaos and violence: What globalization, failed states, and terrorism mean for U.S. foreign policy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield: Distributed by National Book Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, B. W. (2000). Policy analysis for the real world (trad. Introducere În Politicile Publice). Bucharest: trad. Editura Trei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horga, I. (2004). Romania and Its Historical Peculiarities Amongst the Newcomers in the European Union, in Political Space in the History of European Integration. Siena: Il Molino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. Systems Science and World Order Library (1st edn.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. Nemesis: The last days of the American republic. The American Empire Project (1st edn.). New York: Metropolitan Books, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. D. (2000). The coming anarchy = coming anarchy: Shattering the dreams of the post cold war. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiel, L. D. (1994). Managing chaos and complexity in government: A new paradigm for managing change, innovation, and organizational renewal. The Jossey-Bass Public Administration Series (1st edn.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J., & Oxford University Press. (1992). The socialist system the political economy of communism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=287469.

  • Korten, D. C. (2001). When corporations rule the world (2nd edn.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1951) The policy orientation. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method (pp. 3–15). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, C. (2006). The unipolar illusion revisited: The coming end of the United States’ unipolar moment. International Security, 31(2):7–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. New York: Macmillan Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mărginean, I. (2001). Analiza Comparativă a Finanțării Politicilor Sociale: România—Țări În Tranziție—Țările U.E., (The Comparative Analysis of the Social Policies Fundings: Romania—Transitional Countries—the EU Countries). BucureŞti: Comisia Antisărăcie Şi Promovarea Incluziunii Sociale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matei, A. I., & Dogaru, T. (2011). The reform of the national public policies process under the influence of Europeanization. Changes in the policy-making in Romania on institutional and legislative level. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XVI(1), 554. http://www.apas.admpubl.snspa.ro/handle/2010/280.

  • Matei, A. I., & Matei, L. (2010). European Administration. Normative Fundaments and Systemic Models. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester: Social Science Research Network, August 1, 2010. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1651782.

  • Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2006). The rise of the partisan state? Parties, patronage and the ministerial bureaucracy in Hungary. The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22(3):274–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., & European University Institute Max Weber Programme. (2008). Varieties of legacies: A critical review of public administration reform in East Central Europe. Firenze: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morar, F. (2002). The way out and the way in: Post-communism and democracy in Romania. Romanian Political Science Review, 2(1), 77–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. (Updated ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munteanu, ş. (2006). Integrarea Europeană. O Perspectivă Juridico-Filosofică. Bucharest: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Priscilla. (1996). Chaos theory as a model for managing issues and crises. Emmitsburg: National Emergency Training Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrescu, D. (2002). Mai Binele Este Duşmanul Binelui. Aşteptările Neîmplinite Ale Privatizării Româneşti. (Better Is the Enemy of Good. Unfulfilled Expectations of Romanian Privatization). Bucharest: Centrul Român de Politici Economice. www.cerope.ro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine, Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1988, April). Creating organizational order out of chaos: Self-renewal in Japanese Firms. California Management Review, 30(3):57–73. doi:10.2307/41166514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, B. (1999). The state after communism: Administrative transitions in central and Eastern Europe. World Bank Regional and Sectoral Studies. Washington, D.C: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, C. (2002). Civilizing the State Bureaucracy: The Unfulfilled Promise of Public Administration Reform in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic (1990–2000). eScholarship, Berkeley: University of California. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/23m654p8.

  • Ogilvy, J. A. (2002). Creating better futures: Scenario planning as a tool for a better tomorrow. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ōmae, K. (1990). The borderless world: Power and strategy in the interlinked economy. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, & Support for Improvement in Governance and Management in Central and Eastern European Countries. (1998). Preparing Public Administrations for the European Administrative Space. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Păunescu, M. (2006) Organizare şi câmpuri organizaţionale. O analiză instituţională (Organizing and Organizational Fields). IaŞi, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Păunescu, M. (2008) Managementul sectorului public (The Management of Public Sector). In M.Păunescu (Ed.), Management public În România. IaŞşi: Polirom.m.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G.. (2001). The future of governing, Studies in government and public policy (2nd edn., rev.). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Baiba (2008) Consolidarea capacităţii guvernului României de a gestiona şi a coordona politicile publice şi de a aplica procesul decizional (The Consolidation of Romanian Government’s Capacity to Administer and Coordinate Public Policies and to Apply the Decisional Process). In C. Crăciun (Ed.), Transformarea guvernării în România. Provocări pentru managementul politicilor, National Bank of Romania Archive (Trans.: C. Crăciun (Ed.), Managementul politicilor publice: Transformări şi perspective) (pp. 247–269). Iaşi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (1993). The European Council in Copenhagen – 21–22 June 1993–Conclusions of the Presidency. Copenhagen: Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priesmeyer, H. R. (1992). Organizations and chaos: Defining the methods of nonlinear management. Westport: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J., Galbraith, J. K., Faux, J., Lee, T. M., Hutton, W., Stiglitz, J. E., Andrews M., & D’Arista, J. (2006). Taming global capitalism anew. The Nation, March 30, 2006. http://www.thenation.com/article/taming-global-capitalism-anew.

  • Romania. Constitution of Romania, 1991. Bucharest: Monitorul Oficial, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ştefan, M. (2006). Integrarea Europeană. O Perspectivă Juridico-Filosofică. Bucharest: C.H. Beck

    Google Scholar 

  • Ştefan, M. (2008). The decentralization of public services: A never-ending story? In C. Crăciun & P. Collins (Eds.), Public policy management. transformation and perspectives. IaŞi: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheijen, T., & NISPAcee. (2001). Politico-administrative relations: Who rules? Bratislava: The Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, D. (1980). The enterprise of public administration: A summary view. Novato: Chandler & Sharp Publishers, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2004). Global monitoring report. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). Global monitoring report. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2004). Why globalization works. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamfir, C. (2004). O Analiză Critică a Tranziţiei: Ce va Fi “După.” Collegium. IaŞ̦i: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Vaduva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Editor(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vaduva, S., Filip, P. (2015). Governmental Administration and the Security of Romania in a Global Context. In: Vaduva, S., Thomas, A. (eds) Geopolitics, Development, and National Security. SpringerBriefs in Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12685-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics