Skip to main content

Introducing Risk

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fixed-Income Portfolio Analytics
  • 2174 Accesses

Abstract

Portfolio analytics have three key dimensions: exposure, performance, and risk. Substantial time and effort have been allocated to the treatment of exposure and performance analysis of a fixed-income portfolio. It is now time to consider the third and final dimension: risk.

Never was anything great achieved without danger. Nicolò Machiavelli

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The exception is the 80 % probability of losing in cards to my father-in-law; this figure is derived from hard-earned experience!

  2. 2.

    The computation for a single game is simply: \(0.5 \cdot \$1 + 0.5 \cdot -\$1 = \$0\).

  3. 3.

    A sequence of coin tosses—each in itself a Bernoulli trial—is described by the binomial distribution. See Casella and Berger [4] for more on the binomial distribution. We suppress the notion of statistical distribution in this section, but will return to it explicitly in the following discussion.

  4. 4.

    The probability of this outcome is very small at \(\frac{1} {1024}\) or 0.1 %.

  5. 5.

    Extreme-value theory is a complete area of study. See Embrechts et al. [8] for more information.

  6. 6.

    This is a familiar feature of the binomial distribution.

  7. 7.

    One can go much further in selecting a risk measure. Artzner et al. [1] posited a set of mathematical properties that each desirable risk measure should possess. Measures possessing all of these properties are termed coherent.

  8. 8.

    With an investment portfolio, the returns also have a time dimension. Empirically, the returns from one time period to the next are generally uncorrelated. Consequently, we ignore this form of dependence, although it may, albeit weakly, actually exist.

  9. 9.

    None of the risk measures in Table 10.9, with the exception of the mean, is linear—that is, you cannot compute them as a simple weighted average of the underlying components. Try it as an exercise!

  10. 10.

    The interested reader is referred to Appendix A or the following excellent statistical and probability theory references: Casella and Berger [4], Durrett [6] and Billingsley [3].

  11. 11.

    This is the central thesis of Taleb [14], which offers a scathing review of risk-management practices.

  12. 12.

    This is termed volatility clustering. Volatility behaviour is a broad area of financial research. See, for example, Engle [9].

  13. 13.

    The non-normal distribution is constructed using the so-called Cornish–Fisher expansion. See Cornish and Fisher [5] or Maillard [12] for more detail.

  14. 14.

    A moment measures the shape of a set of points—they are basically summary measures for a statistical distribution. The first moment (i.e., the mean) basically describes the shape of the set of average observations, while the second moment (very roughly) describes the average squared observations: this is often termed standard deviation or volatility. Third and fourth moments—also called skewness and kurtosis, respectively—examine cubic and quartic transformations of the observations.

  15. 15.

    This is shown by the points in north–west and south–east quadrants of Fig. 10.10.

  16. 16.

    Although we will make extensive use of it, correlation is not the only approach to measuring dependence. See Embrechts et al. [7] for an excellent discussion of the pros and cons of using correlation.

  17. 17.

    There are actually more points in the two southern quadrants because of the negative skew in the simulated distribution. Without skewness, the points would be more equally spread throughout the four quadrants.

  18. 18.

    Recall that ρ is the Greek letter that is typically used by statisticians to designate the correlation coefficient.

  19. 19.

    Since we are running simulations, there is still some noise in these computations. If we performed a very large number of simulations, however, we would expect risk to be an increasing function of correlation.

  20. 20.

    Moreover, this is a very extreme example. It is probably rather difficult to actually construct a robust portfolio with a return that, under all market conditions, differs from the strategic benchmark by a constant amount.

  21. 21.

    Much more will be said in the subsequent chapters on the construction, estimation, and analysis of this covariance matrix.

  22. 22.

    See Hwang and Satchell [10] for a more detailed discussion of this point.

  23. 23.

    This notion is called backtesting and it is discussed in Chap. 12

  24. 24.

    This has also traditionally been cited as one of the principal advantages of VaR. See Jorion [11] and RiskmetricsTM[13].

  25. 25.

    This follows from Euler’s theorem for homogeneous functions and is discussed in detail in the next chapter.

  26. 26.

    The ex-post tracking error provides useful information for assessing the historical closeness of the portfolio to its strategic benchmark. As a yardstick to measure permissible deviations, however, it is rather unhelpful. This is because, since it looks only backwards, no remedial action can be taken.

  27. 27.

    Active exposures, as we have seen, can be helpful in this regard.

  28. 28.

    An interesting introduction to the foundations of risk analysis is found in Berstein [2].

References

  1. P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.M. Eber, D. Heath, Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3), 203–228 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P.L. Bernstein, Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk (Wiley, New York, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Billingsley, Probability and Measure, 3rd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Casella, R.L. Berger, Statistical Inference (Duxbury Press, Belmont, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.A. Cornish, R.A. Fisher, Moments and cumulants in the specification of distributions. Rev. Inst. Int. Stat. 5(4), 307–320 (1938)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, 2nd edn. (Duxbury Press, Belmont, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Embrechts, A. McNeil, D. Straumann, Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls. ETH Working Paper, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Embrechts, S.I. Resnick, G. Samorodnitsky, Extreme Value Theory as a Risk Management Tool (Cornell University, Rhodes Hall, Fall 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Engle, Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 20(3), 339–350 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Hwang, S. Satchell, Tracking error: ex-ante versus ex-post measures. Financial Economics Research Centre Working Paper WP01-15, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Jorion, Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Maillard, A user’s guide to the cornish fisher expansion. Conservatoire national des arts et métiers, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.P. Morgan/Reuters, RiskMetrics TM — Technical Document (Morgan Guaranty Trust Company, New York, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. N.N. Taleb, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (Random House, New York, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bolder, D.J. (2015). Introducing Risk. In: Fixed-Income Portfolio Analytics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12667-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics