Skip to main content

Problematizing the Monolingual Norm in a Multidialectal City

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language Attitudes and Identities in Multilingual China

Abstract

This chapter further reflects on the questions that Chap. 4 tried to answer: How to perceive the relationship between one’s regional identity and one’s linguistic repertoire? How should the native speakers in the multidialectal city of Guangzhou speak? Attitude towards their mother tongues and mother tongue proficiency is a discursive tool with which they position themselves when dealing with these issues. In this chapter, we will discuss the positions of two seemingly distinct groups: the Putonghua-D1 students and the Cantonese-L1 students, and try to discern the implications on identities in a changing multidialectal city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In diasporic Chinese communities overseas, however, Putonghua is constructed as the tool that signifies and provides access to Pan-Chinese culture and identity.

References

  • Agha, A. (2003). The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication, 23(3–4), 231–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, B. (2007). Heteroglossia and boundaries. In M. Heller (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach. Palgrave advances in linguistics (pp. 257–276). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (trans: Holquist, M. & Emerson, C.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokhorst-Heng, W. (1999). Singapore’s speak mandarin campaign: Language ideological debates and the imagining of the nation. In J. Blommaert (Ed.), Language ideological debates. Language, power and social process (pp. 235–265, Vol. 2). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K. K. Y. (2003). Language shift and language maintenance in mixed marriages: A case study of a Malaysian-Chinese family. International journal of the sociology of language, 2003(161), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (2008). Teaching for transfer: Challenging the two solitudes assumption in bilingual education. In N. H. Hornberger & F. M. Hult (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 65–75). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M. K., & Nambiar, M. (2002). Exogamous marriages and out-migration: Language shift of catholic malayalees in Malaysia. In M. K. David (Ed.), Methodological and analytical issues in language maintenance and language shift studies. Duisburg papers on Research in language and culture (pp. 141–150). Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deumert, A. (2004). Language standardization and language change: The dynamics of cape Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (2006). Communities of practice. In B. Keith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 683–685). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (2010). Language diversity in the classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch, E. (2010). Epistemic injustice and the power to define: Interviewing cameroonian primary school teachers about language education. In C. Candlin & J. Crichton (Eds.), Discourses of deficit. Palgrave studies in professional and organizational discourse (pp. 235–255). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethnic Voice New Zealand. (2005). Voice of the ethnic youth. Orakei Marae: Ethnic Youth Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. F. (1994). The step-tongue: Children’s English in Singapore. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. (1995). Language choice, social institutions, and symbolic domination. Language in Society, 24, 373–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. (1996). Legitimate language in a multilingual school. Linguistics and Education, 8, 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. (2003). Violent youth or violent schools? A critical incident analysis of symbolic violence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(4), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. (2006). The traffic in meaning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(1), 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, E. C. Y. (1985). Language in the family domain in Singapore: An analysis of the 1980 census statistics. Singapore Journal of Education, 7(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. F. E. (2001). Profile of the Singapore Chinese dialect groups. Statistics Singapore Newsletter (pp. 2–6). Singapore: Singapore Department of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1222–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. C. S., & Elly, C. Y. (2002). One day in the life of a “purist”. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(2), 147–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., & Zhu, H. (2010). Voices from the diaspora: Changing hierarchies and dynamics of Chinese multilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2010(205), 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Saravanan, V., & Hoon, J. N. L. (1997). Language shift in the Teochew community in Singapore: A family domain analysis. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(5), 364–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, S. (in press). Problematizing monolingual identities and competence in Guangzhou in the era of multilingualism and superdiversity. In E. Esch & M. Solly (Eds.), Language education and the challenges of globalisation: Sociolinguistic issues. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, P. W. (2002). Strangers in the city: The Hukou and urban citizenship in China [Article]. Journal of International Affairs, 56(1), 305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2005). Disinventing and (re)constituting languages. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 2(3), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mick, C. (2011). Heteroglossia in a multilingual learning space: Approaching language beyond ‘lingualisms’. In C. Helot & M. O Laoire (Eds.), Language policy for the multilingual classroom: Pedagogy of the possible (pp. 22–41). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1985). Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics, 21(2), 339–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2006). Language education as translingual activism. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(1), 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Department of Statistics. (2000). Census of population 2000. Statistical release 2: Education, language and religion. In S. D. o. Statistics (Ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Department of Statistics (2010). Census of population 2010. Statistical release 1: Demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. In S. D. o. Statistics (Ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y. (2006). 广州市中学生语言态度研究 (Middle school students’ language attitudes in Guangzhou). Master of Arts, 中国知网(CNKI), Guangzhou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (1994). Qu’est-ce que la démocratie? Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, U. (2011). Linguistic diversity as a bridge to adjustment: Making the case for bi/multilingualism as a settlement outcome in New Zealand. In C. Hélot & M. Ó. Laoire (Eds.), Language policy for the multilingual classroom: Pedagogy of the possible (pp. 149–173). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Ladegaard, H. (2008). Language attitudes and gender in China: Perceptions and reported use of Putonghua and Cantonese in the southern province of Guangdong. Language Awareness, 17(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, K. A. (1998). Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. (2002). Them and us in Shanghai today. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2002(158), 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sihua (斯华) Liang (梁) .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liang (梁), S. (2015). Problematizing the Monolingual Norm in a Multidialectal City. In: Language Attitudes and Identities in Multilingual China. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12619-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics