Skip to main content

Collectivism and Coercion: The Social Practice of ‘Sharing’ and Distinctive Uses of the Verb ‘Share’ in Contemporary Singapore

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology ((PEPRPHPS,volume 4))

  • 4213 Accesses

Abstract

In the context of contemporary Singapore, this chapter investigates the social practice of ‘sharing’ (particularly in white-collar workplace settings) and distinctive uses of the verb ‘share’. It is argued that both should be understood in relation to what might be called the dominant discourse in Singapore, a worldview largely shaped and promoted by the People’s Action Party (PAP), which has formed the government from independence onwards. Some features of this dominant discourse are highlighted, including certain keywords and conceptual metaphors, all of which, it is argued, point towards a collectivist outlook, in which the needs and wants of the individual are subordinated to the requirements of the nation, as specified by the PAP. It is concluded that the various phenomena described are best understood by taking into account the collectivism or paternalism of the ruling party and that, in essence, the force exerted by the dominant discourse amounts to a form of coercion. Finally, it is suggested that further research in the area by ‘insider’ researchers or by those from other theoretical perspectives, such as those using natural semantic metalanguage as an analytic framework, might prove fruitful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.thedp.com/index.php/article/2012/04/singapore_ambassador_discusses_politics_in_huntsman.

  2. 2.

    See http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-02/08/content_2561604.htm.

  3. 3.

    http://www.mom.gov.sg/aboutus/Pages/vision-mission-values.aspx.

  4. 4.

    http://www.mha.gov.sg/overview.aspx?pageid=187&secid=28.

  5. 5.

    http://www.anthonian.edu.sg/node/6.

  6. 6.

    Stubbs (2010, p. 25) provides more explicit guidance when he suggests that keywords are those ‘which are significantly more frequent in a sample of text than would be expected, given their frequency in a large general reference corpus’.

  7. 7.

    All sources can be found by entering all or part of the relevant words into a search engine. All the above examples could be accessed online as of September 2013.

References

  • Archer, Margaret. 2000. Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, Michael. 2002. Cultural politics and Asian values. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Tony, Lawrence Grossberg, and Meaghan Morris. 2005. New keywords: A revised vocabulary of culture and society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergler, Sabine. 1993. Semantic dimensions in the field of reporting verbs. In: Proceedings of the ninth annual conference of the University of Waterloo Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary and Text Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilton, Tony, Kevin Bonnett, Pip Jones, David Skinner, Michelle Stanworth, and Andrew Webster. 1996. Introductory sociology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Michael, Kwok-Choi Wan, Kwok Leung, and Robert Giacalone. 1985. How are responses to verbal insult related to cultural collectivism and power distance? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 16:111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British National Corpus.http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/. Accessed 11 Sept 2013.

  • Burr, Vivien. 1995. An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, Terence. 2005. Civil society in Singapore: Popular discourses and concepts. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 20 (2): 273–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Beng Huat. 2008. Foreword. In The scripting of a national history: Singapore and its pasts, ed. Lysa Hong and Jianli Huang. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Linda, and Paul Kay. 1981. Prototype semantics: The English word ‘lie’. Language 57 (1): 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. Christopher. 1993. East meets West meets Mid-East: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal 36 (2): 319–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson, Donald. 1995. Singapore and the Asian Values Debate. Journal of Democracy 6 (4): 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. 2001. The dialectics of discourse. Textus 14:231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, S. 2013. Education and the nation state. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Michael. 2000. “Asian values” as reverse orientalism: Singapore. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 41 (2): 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, Adrian. 1999. Small cultures. Applied Linguistics 20 (2): 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Lysa, and Jianli Huang. 2008. The scripting of a national history: Singapore and its pasts. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Mark. 2010. The Singapore solution. National Geographic 217 (1): 132–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, David, and David Brown. 1994. Singapore and the myth of the liberalizing middle class. The Pacific Review 7 (1): 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer-Dahl, Anneliese, Peter Teo, and Alexius Chia. 2007. Supporting knowledge construction and literate talk in secondary social studies. Linguistics and Education 18:167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuah, Khun Eng. 1990. Confucian ideology and social engineering in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia 20 (3): 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Eddie. 1992. Confucianism as political discourse in Singapore. Singapore: Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Kuan Yew. 2000. From third world to first. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, Geoffrey, and Jan Svartvik. 1975. A communicative grammar of English. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, Patrick. 2006. Father leadership: The Singapore case study. Management Decision 44 (1): 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1869. On liberty. 4th ed. London: Longman, Green, Reader and Dyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, Bahira. 2001. The ambiguity of boundaries in the fieldwork experience: Establishing rapport and negotiating insider/outsider status. Qualitative Inquiry 7 (4): 436–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, John (Ed.). 2000. Collins COBUILD English Grammar. Glasgow: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott, Kenneth and Guat Tin Low. 2000. Leadership in Singapore schools: The impact of national culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 20 (2): 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, Michael. 1998. German loan words and cultural stereotypes. English Today 14 (1): 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, Michael. 2010. Three concepts of keywords. In Keyness in texts: Studies in corpus linguistics, ed. Marina Bondi and Mike Scott. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Kenneth. 2001. “Civic society” and the “new economy” in patriarchal Singapore. Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of South-East Asian Studies 15 (2): 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Kenneth. 2007. Singapore’s national day rally speech: A site of ideological negotiation. Journal of Contemporary Asia 37 (3): 292–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, John. 2000. Sociology beyond societies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Steve. 2011. Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 2003. Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Jock Onn. 2004. Cultural scripts, ways of speaking and perceptions of personal autonomy: Anglo English vs. Singapore English. Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (2): 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, John, and Aline Wong. 1989. Confucian values as a social framework for Singapore's economic development. Paper presented at the conference on Confucianism and economic development in East Asia, Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yum, June Ock. 1988. The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs 55:374–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Poole .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poole, B. (2016). Collectivism and Coercion: The Social Practice of ‘Sharing’ and Distinctive Uses of the Verb ‘Share’ in Contemporary Singapore. In: Capone, A., Mey, J. (eds) Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12615-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12616-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics