Abstract
In the context of contemporary Singapore, this chapter investigates the social practice of ‘sharing’ (particularly in white-collar workplace settings) and distinctive uses of the verb ‘share’. It is argued that both should be understood in relation to what might be called the dominant discourse in Singapore, a worldview largely shaped and promoted by the People’s Action Party (PAP), which has formed the government from independence onwards. Some features of this dominant discourse are highlighted, including certain keywords and conceptual metaphors, all of which, it is argued, point towards a collectivist outlook, in which the needs and wants of the individual are subordinated to the requirements of the nation, as specified by the PAP. It is concluded that the various phenomena described are best understood by taking into account the collectivism or paternalism of the ruling party and that, in essence, the force exerted by the dominant discourse amounts to a form of coercion. Finally, it is suggested that further research in the area by ‘insider’ researchers or by those from other theoretical perspectives, such as those using natural semantic metalanguage as an analytic framework, might prove fruitful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Stubbs (2010, p. 25) provides more explicit guidance when he suggests that keywords are those ‘which are significantly more frequent in a sample of text than would be expected, given their frequency in a large general reference corpus’.
- 7.
All sources can be found by entering all or part of the relevant words into a search engine. All the above examples could be accessed online as of September 2013.
References
Archer, Margaret. 2000. Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barr, Michael. 2002. Cultural politics and Asian values. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bennett, Tony, Lawrence Grossberg, and Meaghan Morris. 2005. New keywords: A revised vocabulary of culture and society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bergler, Sabine. 1993. Semantic dimensions in the field of reporting verbs. In: Proceedings of the ninth annual conference of the University of Waterloo Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary and Text Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bilton, Tony, Kevin Bonnett, Pip Jones, David Skinner, Michelle Stanworth, and Andrew Webster. 1996. Introductory sociology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Bond, Michael, Kwok-Choi Wan, Kwok Leung, and Robert Giacalone. 1985. How are responses to verbal insult related to cultural collectivism and power distance? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 16:111–127.
British National Corpus.http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/. Accessed 11 Sept 2013.
Burr, Vivien. 1995. An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
Chong, Terence. 2005. Civil society in Singapore: Popular discourses and concepts. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 20 (2): 273–301.
Chua, Beng Huat. 2008. Foreword. In The scripting of a national history: Singapore and its pasts, ed. Lysa Hong and Jianli Huang. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Coleman, Linda, and Paul Kay. 1981. Prototype semantics: The English word ‘lie’. Language 57 (1): 26–44.
Earley, P. Christopher. 1993. East meets West meets Mid-East: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal 36 (2): 319–348.
Emmerson, Donald. 1995. Singapore and the Asian Values Debate. Journal of Democracy 6 (4): 95–105.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. The dialectics of discourse. Textus 14:231–242.
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.
Gopinathan, S. 2013. Education and the nation state. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hill, Michael. 2000. “Asian values” as reverse orientalism: Singapore. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 41 (2): 177–190.
Hofstede, Geert. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Holliday, Adrian. 1999. Small cultures. Applied Linguistics 20 (2): 237–264.
Hong, Lysa, and Jianli Huang. 2008. The scripting of a national history: Singapore and its pasts. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Jacobson, Mark. 2010. The Singapore solution. National Geographic 217 (1): 132–148.
Jones, David, and David Brown. 1994. Singapore and the myth of the liberalizing middle class. The Pacific Review 7 (1): 79–87.
Kramer-Dahl, Anneliese, Peter Teo, and Alexius Chia. 2007. Supporting knowledge construction and literate talk in secondary social studies. Linguistics and Education 18:167–199.
Kuah, Khun Eng. 1990. Confucian ideology and social engineering in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia 20 (3): 371–383.
Kuo, Eddie. 1992. Confucianism as political discourse in Singapore. Singapore: Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, Kuan Yew. 2000. From third world to first. New York: HarperCollins.
Leech, Geoffrey, and Jan Svartvik. 1975. A communicative grammar of English. Harlow: Longman.
Low, Patrick. 2006. Father leadership: The Singapore case study. Management Decision 44 (1): 89–104.
Mill, John Stuart. 1869. On liberty. 4th ed. London: Longman, Green, Reader and Dyer.
Sherif, Bahira. 2001. The ambiguity of boundaries in the fieldwork experience: Establishing rapport and negotiating insider/outsider status. Qualitative Inquiry 7 (4): 436–447.
Sinclair, John (Ed.). 2000. Collins COBUILD English Grammar. Glasgow: HarperCollins.
Stott, Kenneth and Guat Tin Low. 2000. Leadership in Singapore schools: The impact of national culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 20 (2): 99–109.
Stubbs, Michael. 1998. German loan words and cultural stereotypes. English Today 14 (1): 19–26.
Stubbs, Michael. 2010. Three concepts of keywords. In Keyness in texts: Studies in corpus linguistics, ed. Marina Bondi and Mike Scott. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tan, Kenneth. 2001. “Civic society” and the “new economy” in patriarchal Singapore. Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of South-East Asian Studies 15 (2): 95–124.
Tan, Kenneth. 2007. Singapore’s national day rally speech: A site of ideological negotiation. Journal of Contemporary Asia 37 (3): 292–308.
Urry, John. 2000. Sociology beyond societies. London: Routledge.
Walsh, Steve. 2011. Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2003. Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.
Wong, Jock Onn. 2004. Cultural scripts, ways of speaking and perceptions of personal autonomy: Anglo English vs. Singapore English. Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (2): 231–248.
Wong, John, and Aline Wong. 1989. Confucian values as a social framework for Singapore's economic development. Paper presented at the conference on Confucianism and economic development in East Asia, Taipei.
Yum, June Ock. 1988. The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs 55:374–388.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poole, B. (2016). Collectivism and Coercion: The Social Practice of ‘Sharing’ and Distinctive Uses of the Verb ‘Share’ in Contemporary Singapore. In: Capone, A., Mey, J. (eds) Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12615-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12616-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)