Abstract
Racist text and talk, on the one hand, is obviously an expression of the ethnic prejudices of the author, to be described in terms of the socially shared social cognitive representations of dominant groups, and the individual prejudiced mental models of their members about concrete “ethnic events.” On the other hand, these racist discourses—as well as their racist cognitions—have a social and political function, namely maintaining the domination of the white majority. But racist discourse is not a direct expression or implementation of racist domination; such domination is mediated by the way language users as social members represent ethnic relations in their minds, and thus are able to connect to the underlying mental structures of text and talk. More specifically, the social dimension of racist discourse could thus be formulated in terms of those who control the access to, and the contents and formats of public discourse: the symbolic elites, especially in politics, the media, and education.
This chapter summarizes some of the findings of my research on discourse and racism since the early 1980s. This research has three main tenets. The first is the study of the coverage of immigration in the press, starting with a modest book in Dutch about the Dutch press, followed by studies of the British, and later, less extensively, also the Spanish and Latin American press. More or less independent of political or ideological orientation, newspapers in many parts of the “Western” world portray immigrants and minorities as different, deviant, and a threat, and focus on immigration in terms of an invasion, integration as a major social problem, and multiculturalism and diversity as a threat to cultural homogeneity. On the other hand, the problems immigrants or minorities experience because of Us are ignored or mitigated, as is especially the case for the coverage of prejudice, discrimination, and racism—not only at the extreme right. The second major focus of this research deals with political discourse, especially in a major project (with Ruth Wodak), Racism at the Top, that analyzes discourse on immigration in the UK, Germany, France, Austria, Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands. Interestingly but not surprisingly, the topics and strategies of political discourse on immigration are very similar to the dominant coverage of these topics in the press: Immigrants are portrayed as different (such as Muslim women and their hijab), deviant, and a threat. Third, in education, textbooks also tend to reproduce stereotypes on minorities and immigrants, focus mostly on problems of immigration and integration, and typically avoid or mitigate Our racism. The last phase of this project focuses on the same three dimensions of discourse and racism in Spain and Latin America—especially in a large project conducted by specialists in eight Latin American countries. One major conclusion of research on the three main domains of the discursive reproduction of racism is that the symbolic elites who control public discourse in these domains are specifically responsible for this process of reproduction.
This chapter is a shortened version of a paper contributed to the 17th International Workshop on Discourse Studies, Madrid, 24–25 March 2011.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blommaert, J., and J. Verschueren. 1992. Het Belgische Migrantendebat. The pragmatiek van de abnormalisering. (The Belgian Immigration Debate. The ·pragmatics of ‘abnormalization’). Antwerpen: International Pragmatics Association.
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and power. Harlow: Longman.
Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress, and T. Trew. 1979. Language and control. London: Routledge.
Hartmann, P., and C. Husband. 1974. Racism and the mass media. London: Davis-Poynter.
Henry, F., and C. Tator. 2002. Discourses of domination. Racial bias in the Canadian English-language press. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Jäger, S. 1992. BrandSätze. Rassismus im Alltag. ('Brandsätze' –Inflammatory Sentences/ Firebombs. Racism in everyday life). DISS-Studien. Duisburg: DISS.
Jäger, S., et al. 1998. Der Spuk ist nicht vorbei. Völkisch-nationalistische Ideologeme im öffentlichen Diskurs der Gegenwart (The Ghost hasn't gone away. Völkisch-nationalist ideologemes in contemporary public discourse). Duisburg: DISS.
Macaulay, R. K. S. 2004. Talk that counts. Age, gender, and social class differences in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak, eds. 2001. Discourse and discrimination. Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Smitherman-Donaldson, G., and T. A. Van Dijk. 1988. Discourse and Discrimination. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. 1983. Minderheden in de media. (Minorities in the media). Amsterdam: SUA.
Van Dijk, T. A. 1984. Prejudice in discourse. An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. A. 1987a. Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. 1987b. Schoolvoorbeelden van racisme. De reproduktie van racisme in maatschappijleerboeken (Textbook examples of racism. The reproduction of racism in social science textbooks). Amsterdam: Socialistische Uitgeverij Amsterdam. [this study is summarized in a chapter of Van Dijk, 1993].
Van Dijk, T. A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. 1993. Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A. 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A. 2005. Racism and discourse in Spain and Latin America. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. A. 2008a. Discourse and context. A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. 2008b. Discourse and Power. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Van Dijk, T. A. 2009. Society and discourse. How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.
Van Dijk, T. A. ed. 2009. Racism and Discourse in Latin America. Lamham: Lexington Books.
Wetherell, M., and J. Potter. 1992. Mapping the language of racism. Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Windisch, U. 1978. Xénophobie? Logique de la pensée populaire (Xenophobia? Logique of popular thought). Lausanne: L’Age d’Homme.
Windisch, U. 1985. Le raisonnement et le parler quotidiens. Lausanne: L’Age d’homme.
Windisch, U. 1990. Speech and reasoning in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Wodak, R. 1989. Language, power, and ideology. Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, R., P. Nowak, J. Pelikan, H. Gruber, R. de Cillia, and R. Mitten. 1990. “Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter”. Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus (“We are all innocent perpetrators” Discourse historic studies in post war antisemitism). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Wodak, R., and T. A. Van Dijk, eds. 2000. Racism at the top. Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Dijk, T. (2016). Discourse and Racism: Some Conclusions of 30 Years of Research. In: Capone, A., Mey, J. (eds) Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12615-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12616-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)